Dudley wrote:
Runcle wrote:
Dudley wrote:
Assuming of course I'm not bumped off tonight, but I'm pretty certain I've laid the seeds of townie victory here. Malc, you can still do veg if you like but it might be worth investigating Mr Runcle if we do lynch Pundy and turn out to be right.
oh I almost forgot I wonder why me and vegetables should be the ones up for investigating when really we've only targetted malc, lace yesterday was pretty much just a shot in the wind saved by a dodgy screenshot. Why shouldnt you be up for investigation with you claims aswell? and also apparently im sticking up for pundabaya whose made quite a secretive role claim, whereas your sticking up for malc whose made a very doubtful mistaken filled actual role claim, I know which one looks the more suspicious.
Because Vegetables was crying for a Malc lynch. If he's telling the truth, he's the mafia's #1 target because he can out them 1 by 1. You are only if I'm right about Pundy, which is sensible since you have identical block style voting pattern with him.
He's absolutely allowed to investigate me. It'll show I've been telling the truth, you'll say "Oh look he's only investigating townies, how convenient" and we'll be back here tomorrow. I don't think Punabaya's made any role claim. I think he, along with 2 others has been block voting known townies. I'm sticking up for Malc because the evidence currently supports him and if he's lying he'll be found out near instantly. I believe he should be given the chance to do so.
Malc has made a reasoned, rational roleclaim supported by what evidence we have and easily determined fully in short order. Pundabaya is part of a fairly seriously suspected block voting cull and is now silent while another of those cronies tries to twist evidence (like claiming I'm voting for pundy on the basis of a role claim, which is exactly what I didn't say) to try and get out of that.
theres so much bullshit in here I dont know where to start.
The constant faith in malc all the way through is unbelieveable. on the basis hes the biggest threat to the mafia is based on that hes actually penguin which has not been proven and is still very doubtful, Im not sure why you have no doubt in him at all, oh wait thats because you dont want to imply any reason to doubt him because hes in your mafia group.
I like how youv'e described both you and malc as 'telling the truth' in your post. And of course any investigation he brings back are going to be townie roles, its the only way to keep his fake role up.
pundabaya has clearly made a role claim, and its took a few other people some time in realising this and I would have thought yourself would have spotted and Im sure you have and I think by denying this role claim your trying to put it in other players minds that he hasnt done a role claim at all and the votes for him will continue.
'I'm sticking up for Malc because the evidence currently supports him and if he's lying he'll be found out near instantly'
what evidence? theres no evidence at all, and how wil we find out he's lying? your just making baseless comments putting full faith in malc trying to get people to think the same way.
'Malc has made a reasoned, rational roleclaim supported by what evidence we have and easily determined fully in short order.'
this quote comes soon after the previous one, apparently malc has been reasoned and rational, has he fuck.
theres another bit going on about the evidence that proofs his role claim which is none. pretty much repeating the last quote just to try and really nail it in peoples heads that malc isnt a bad guy.
and pundabaya you emo cunt, if there really is a doctor they should be looking after your suicidal self.