Well I agree with pretty much everyone here. At first I thought that maybe I was being a little too sensitive but then I read the 'Scambaiter's' writings about justifying it.
They go a little like this (incase you didn't read the entire site from top to bottom, and fair enough I didn't expect people to, I mean, I made the thread
)
Quote:
I have heard people claim that the baiter would be responsible if the criminal being baited was hurt during the bait. If I had a bag of money, tossed it off a cliff, and a person jumped off the cliff after the money, would I be responsible for that person being killed?
Hmm. See, he starts off like that. But it was hardly like that, really. Throwing money from a cliff and watching someone jump is a bit different to throwing money from a cliff and encouraging someone to jump for it talking them into it and promising they will be fine.
Quote:
They chose to do it on their own.
See this is where I found this guy to be wrong. There's doing something on your own and then there is being talked and coerced into it. How you could knowingly talk someone into sending two (possibly innocent) young men into certain death IMO is disgusting and can no way be excused.
Quote:
Let me also point out that there is no evidence that anyone was killed or hurt in this bait. In fact, there is more indication from news reports from the region, that the two scammers that may have traveled into Darfur are probably in jail somewhere.
So, try to rest easy about all this. I know that I will.
Which is an obvious attempt at talking oneself out of guilt.
I do agree that these scammers need to be stopped. I do agree that you can have fun with it. But, hurting people or going out of your way to make sure that others come to harm (which is so fucking obvious from reading it all) is wrong.
I sort of gave away how I feel about this in one of the poll options. Two wrongs do not make a right. Ever. And, from the baiter's defensive "I don't give a fuck about them because they are scum" attitude it's blatantly obvious that he will lose sleep over this, probably for the rest of his life.
Sure, the Koku guy may have been an utter shit bag (and it appears he sent his
own nephew to die (Albino I agree with you 100%) but that doesn't mean these two young kids were shit bags. That's also something the baiter has sort of refused to take into account or acknowledge. And he cannot justify that because he only ever got one email from them and aside from that knows nothing about them whatsoever.
Also, this justification (sorry for the repeat)
Quote:
I have heard people claim that the baiter would be responsible if the criminal being baited was hurt during the bait. If I had a bag of money, tossed it off a cliff, and a person jumped off the cliff after the money, would I be responsible for that person being killed?
Could surely apply to every single last person who got caught out by these scammers?
Thing is, in some cases (due to poverty etc) these scammers
have nothing to lose. This is made clear on the 419 website. These people who have lost their houses, got into debt, lost all their money and have even been killed? They had a lot to lose. Reading through other justifications for that bait I read about some Greek millionaire who went to Durban to meet with scammers and was tortured and killed. Why? What motivated him to do that? money? more money than he already had?
The venom and spite spat around by that baiter was of biblical proportions and IMO utterly disgusting. Maybe he should have considered a job as a fucking mall cop if he wanted to dish out justice?