Royal Rumble 2017 Sweepstake

TheVision · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:55

It’s that time again for the annual Royal Rumble Sweepstake.

The rules are simple, £2 will buy you two numbers in the 2017 Royal Rumble which is held on 29th January.

The number will then relate to the wrestlers chosen number to enter the Rumble. If your numbered wrestler wins the Rumble, then you win all of the money!

Let me know if you’re interested below and then I’ll get the PMs sent out with where to send the money.

Good luck everyone!

MaliA · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:05

Grim... · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:09

Kofi KINgston!

Curiosity · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:11

KevIN Owens.

TheVision · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:11

I'm in too which means we'll need another 11 names.

devilman · **Posted:** Tue Jan 17, 2017 13:38

IrwIN R. Schyster

Pundabaya · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 5016

I'd join, but I can't think of a shitty wrestling pun.

So I'm OUTback Jack.

Dr Zoidberg · **Joined:** 15th Oct, 2010 **Posts:** 5386

I don't know enough about wrestlINg to make puns.

Pundabaya · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 5016

Wait, wait.... FlyIN' Brian Pillman.

Pundabaya · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 5016

Man, I can think of loads now.

TheVision · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2017 16:04

Big money up for grabs... Come on people, it's wrestling! Everyone loves wrestling.

Grim... · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2017 22:20

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2017 22:22

Grim... wrote:

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Basically fill up the spots with me, Grim and Craster if you are short on people. We'll be watching it live in a bar with a couple hundred people. We do that for the big PPVs. You should come to one (or this one!) as they're tremendous fun.

DavPaz · **Joined:** 27th Jun, 2008 **Posts:** 38642

Sign me up!

Bobbyaro · **Joined:** 18th Apr, 2008 **Posts:** 11895

Curiosity wrote:

Grim... wrote:

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Basically fill up the spots with me, Grim and Craster if you are short on people. We'll be watching it live in a bar with a couple hundred people. We do that for the big PPVs. You should come to one (or this one!) as they're tremendous fun.

Grrr. Couple OF hundred people.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 8:15

Bobbyaro wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

Grim... wrote:

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Basically fill up the spots with me, Grim and Craster if you are short on people. We'll be watching it live in a bar with a couple hundred people. We do that for the big PPVs. You should come to one (or this one!) as they're tremendous fun.

Grrr. Couple OF hundred people.

Nah, a couple is two people.

MaliA · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:21

Curiosity wrote:

Bobbyaro wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

Grim... wrote:

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Basically fill up the spots with me, Grim and Craster if you are short on people. We'll be watching it live in a bar with a couple hundred people. We do that for the big PPVs. You should come to one (or this one!) as they're tremendous fun.

Grrr. Couple OF hundred people.

Nah, a couple is two people.

Different to a pear.

Grim... · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:25

I think if you put an "of" in you also have to pluralise "hundred people" somehow, as there's more than one of them. Hundreds.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:30

No, there's just one hundred. One is the amount and hundred is the unit of choice.

Grim... · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:04

Lonewolves wrote:

No, there's just one hundred. One is the amount and hundred is the unit of choice.

But there's two of them.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:14

People is already the plural of person though?

Mr Dave · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:19

People's is the plural of people

MaliA · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:20

MaliA wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

Bobbyaro wrote:

Curiosity wrote:

Grim... wrote:

I'll take another, if there are spare.
And another, knowing me.

Basically fill up the spots with me, Grim and Craster if you are short on people. We'll be watching it live in a bar with a couple hundred people. We do that for the big PPVs. You should come to one (or this one!) as they're tremendous fun.

Grrr. Couple OF hundred people.

Nah, a couple is two people.

Different to a pear.

Grim... · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:22

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

Yeah, but you need the plural of "one hundred people", because you've got two of them. Two one hundred peoples.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:22

Mr Dave wrote:

People's is the plural of people

Not with an possessive apostrophe it's not.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49244

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

Mr Dave · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:22

Lonewolves wrote:

Mr Dave wrote:

People's is the plural of people

Not with an possessive apostrophe it's not.

Peepholes is the plural of people's.

TheVision · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:23

Mr Dave wrote:

People's is the plural of people

Like the People's champion The Rock? A wrestler... Who has taken part in the Royal Rumble before?

Come on people, it's only £2. I'm presuming everyone who has posted in this thread is IN?

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:25

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

Yeah, but you need the plural of "one hundred people", because you've got two of them. Two one hundred peoples.

If you say so

Grim... · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:26

Lonewolves wrote:

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

Yeah, but you need the plural of "one hundred people", because you've got two of them. Two one hundred peoples.

If you say so

Well, I don't. Hence both "couple of hundred people" and "couple hundred people" are wrong, when you lay them out.

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49244

TheVision wrote:

Mr Dave wrote:

People's is the plural of people

Like the People's champion The Rock? A wrestler... Who has taken part in the Royal Rumble before?

Come on people, it's only £2. I'm presuming everyone who has posted in this thread is IN?

RavishINg Rick Rude

Now let's hope they don'5 block my PayPal account for three months this time.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:28

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

What about sheep? Two pairs of sheep.

I've forgotten what we're doing

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49244

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

What about sheep? Two pairs of sheep.

I've forgotten what we're doing

Sheep is a plural noun. Hundred isn't.

You're gambling on wrestling.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:33

Cras wrote:

You're gambling on wrestling.

I am bloody not.

MaliA · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:38

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

What about sheep? Two pairs of sheep.

I've forgotten what we're doing

A flock of cows

Mr Dave · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:40

Headlines tomorrow : Bradford man arrested for mass cow-buggery

Cras · **Joined:** 30th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 49244

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

You're gambling on wrestling.

I am bloody not.

Then what are you doing in this thread?!

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:44

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

You're gambling on wrestling.

I am bloody not.

Then what are you doing in this thread?!

Sexy grammar talk

Kern · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:57

MaliA wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

What about sheep? Two pairs of sheep.

I've forgotten what we're doing

A flock of cows

A herd of cows. A horde of Vikings. Easy, innit?

MaliA · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:03

Kern wrote:

MaliA wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

Cras wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

So? You say two pairs of socks.

What about sheep? Two pairs of sheep.

I've forgotten what we're doing

A flock of cows

A herd of cows. A horde of Vikings. Easy, innit?

Yes. Large quadraped herbivores, produce milk and steak. I have herd of cows.

Mimi · **Joined:** 27th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 26023

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

Yeah, but you need the plural of "one hundred people", because you've got two of them. Two one hundred peoples.

If you say so

Well, I don't. Hence both "couple of hundred people" and "couple hundred people" are wrong, when you lay them out.

I've heard 'a couple of hundreds of people' used, which you could argue against in the contexts of 'hundreds' not being properly defined (in that it can be a couple of 3 hundredsworth of people, so six hundred people...) but I think that would only be an argument mounted by someone being even more awkward than pedantic..

I've also heard 'a couple of a hundred of people' used, or maybe 'a couple of a hundred people'. Can't remember.

I'd probably say 'two hundred people'.

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 14:08

I would say 'a duo of 10²'

TheVision · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 14:11

I would say "In".

Zardoz · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 15:45

How many more contestants do you need?

TheVision · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 15:57

Zardoz wrote:

How many more contestants do you need?

A quick count says 7... I think.

Curiosity · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 16:14

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

Grim... wrote:

Lonewolves wrote:

People is already the plural of person though?

Yeah, but you need the plural of "one hundred people", because you've got two of them. Two one hundred peoples.

If you say so

Well, I don't. Hence both "couple of hundred people" and "couple hundred people" are wrong, when you lay them out.

Look what we got here... a cuppa haters...

myp · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 18:15

I love a nice cuppa.

Mimi · **Joined:** 27th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 26023

The Vision, I will have one entry into your sweepstake, please.

TheVision · **Posted:** Thu Jan 19, 2017 22:13

Mimi wrote:

The Vision, I will have one entry into your sweepstake, please.

You're most welcome! You're in.

Mimi · **Joined:** 27th Mar, 2008 **Posts:** 26023

Is it the same Paypal address as last year?

Be Excellent To Each Other

Royal Rumble 2017 Sweepstake
Who will survive?

Who is online

Be Excellent To Each Other

Royal Rumble 2017 Sweepstake Who will survive?

Who is online

Royal Rumble 2017 Sweepstake
Who will survive?