BikNorton wrote:
I know it's is semantics but it looks really.wrong to write the circumference like that instead of 2πr.
Though 2πr is correct and absolutely the standard form, a needle gauge when working with round needles measures the diameter, so to make this representative in the calculation as displayed I'd have to halve the diameter to give the radius to then multiply again to fit the form, which doesn't make any sense.
Quote:
Besides that, would showing the (larger) difference in area not be more useful?
Not for what I am using it for. Yarn wraps around the diameter or perimeter of the needle, rather than occupy the space within it, so it is the difference in the distance the yarn has to travel around the needle that has to be accounted for when sizing the needle for the task.