Allow me to respond properly with an actual accounting of what occurred, rather than the steaming pile of horseshit that Bamba has piled high for you to read.
I was countering Craster's rather dense assertion that simply increasing organ supply 'in no way possible' could lead to a decrease of availability, and that was after I'd previously gave one example as to how that could happen. So all I did is quote myself:
ElephantBanjoGnome wrote:
But since we're on the subject, yes, it's very possible that a service stretched thin would provide a lower quality of service to all, resulting in more 'off' organs than would otherwise be the case with the opt-in system with resources scaled to availability.
After which you can very clearly see Bamba reply to me with nonsense that included calling me a 'massive dick', and thereafter followed my post.
There are a few salient points here, Bamba. Firstly, you wouldn't argue the toss, or word it in such an aggressive and argumentative way, if it wasn't me. You don't
like me, which I couldn't give less of a fuck about, except for the fact that it clearly compels you to take issue with everything I say regardless of what it is and make a post to oppose it. You could insist you'd say the same to anyone else but nobody would believe that.
The fundamental issue here is that you're fucking
lazy with it too. It wouldn't require more than a single iota of independent thought to consider how a sudden and unprepared over-supply of organs could cause disastrous issues, but because it's me you fold your arms and huffily demand that I provide citations and reasoning to justify what should be a completely self-explanatory position. Then when I do lead you by the nose through the basic premise of the argument, you call me defensive, try to demean my reasoning, and then insult me on top? On a topic you know fuck all about?
Yeah, I don't think so. All of this is a very deliberate attempt to rile me up, which you are able to do so easily because of your profound fucking ignorance on the subject, and your determined unwillingness to engage that pea-brain to concede any validity in my argument or to germinate your own thoughts.
So you deserved to be told what a worthless piece of shit you are, and I told you. I'd do it again and indeed will do so if you pull the same kind of bollocks in the future.
It's fucking
laughable that in one breath you're telling Cavey to 'suck it up' because 'shit happens on online forums' to excuse your own behaviour, whilst at the same time berating the rest of Beex for tolerating my alleged 'toxicity' in another. The only thing I do, bucko, is voice my honest opinions and tell people who I think are particularly special idiots what I think of them using language that adequately conveys my strength of feeling. Suck it up, it's an internet forum. If someone insults me I don't run crying to the mods - I'll just respond appropriately and in kind, or in a manner that leaves you in little doubt as to what I think. If you don't like it then that's just too jolly bad.
Trying to attack Cavey because he's a good guy that refuses to doggypile on to me with the rest and can actually see through my swears to the point I'm trying to make and why I'm making it just reiterates why he's such a valuable forumite here. Let's not be in any doubt, he's a
far nicer person than me and will make many concessions in an argument in order to stimulate the kind of intelligent debate that he's aiming for here. It's just unfortunate that many people then pick up those concessions in order to beat him around the head with them and use it as flimsy justification to negate his whole position. I don't know why he posts here as I can only imagine there are plenty of other places on the internet that would appreciate him far more.
And finally, for the record, the initials are
EBG, you bumbling belm-merchant.
_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes,
really, it's just some are too right on to admit it.