Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 20:21 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
I've not seen Derek, but the adverts made it look like it was belittling mentaly disabled people, so I didn't watch it.

I could take or leave The office, but really liked Extras, I don't really like the one with Karl in, but not sat down to watch a full episode of it, that's just based on the clips I've seen and the adverts. Also not seen the one with Warwick Davies in.

Like I said I really went off him after seeing that Christmas thing, and then more recently the aforementioned twitter argument he had with Herring over the word mong.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 20:55 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16641
Ha ha, this thread reads like a newspaper comments section with a load of outraged Dorises from Dorset moaning about something they know nothing about but reckon should probably be stopped.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 21:14 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38667
Won't somebody think of the kids?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 21:36 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
It's yet more proof that teh BBC is out of control and the license fee should be cut cut cut!!!!!1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 22:19 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12338
DavPaz wrote:
Image

"I know that guy!"

He looks like a muppet with his hands being held up on sticks.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 22:50 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22397
Racist


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:32 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
markg wrote:
Ha ha, this thread reads like a newspaper comments section with a load of outraged Dorises from Dorset moaning about something they know nothing about but reckon should probably be stopped.


I'm not saying he should be stopped, just pointing out why I didn't watch it.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:47 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 6183
GovernmentYard wrote:
As for Derek, I didn't see any of it until last week where I caught ten minutes, which began with Pilkington getting pelted with seaweed (I laughed like a drain) and then the tipp-exing of swear words onto crabs (laughed like a choir of drains, forever).

I might watch it again.
I watched that one last night. First one I've seen. Here's my thoughts...

Fair enjoyed it. Glad I'm not fishing anymore or I'd have been writing on the crabs this morning :DD Dunno why everyone thinks Derek's meant to be a mong. The end was nice too :)

_________________
"Wullie's [accent] is so thick he sounds like he's chewing on haggis stuffed with shortbread and heroin" - Dimrill
"TOO MANY FUCKING SWEARS!" - Mary Shitehouse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:09 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
markg wrote:
Ha ha, this thread reads like a newspaper comments section with a load of outraged Dorises from Dorset moaning about something they know nothing about but reckon should probably be stopped.

Given that no one has cast any aspersions on you personally for the fact you like it, merely expressed differing views on the source material, is that sort of response really justified?

And "know nothing about"? I've got two severely disabled relatives, but we can disappear up our own arses having a "some of my best mates are disabled" bollocks contest.

Different people react differently to different things. I'm not sure that requires name calling, does it?

you fucking spacker.

DYSWIDT. ;)

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:12 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Just watched some of it now, Derek isn't that funny, but Karl and Kev are funny


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:14 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16641
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
markg wrote:
Ha ha, this thread reads like a newspaper comments section with a load of outraged Dorises from Dorset moaning about something they know nothing about but reckon should probably be stopped.

Given that no one has cast any aspersions on you personally for the fact you like it, merely expressed differing views on the source material, is that sort of response really justified?

And "know nothing about"? I've got two severely disabled relatives, but we can disappear up our own arses having a "some of my best mates are disabled" bollocks contest.

Different people react differently to different things. I'm not sure that requires name calling, does it?

you fucking spacker.

DYSWIDT. ;)
"know nothing about" was referring to people who obviously haven't even watched the fucking programme in question before offering their opinion on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:16 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
markg wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
markg wrote:
Ha ha, this thread reads like a newspaper comments section with a load of outraged Dorises from Dorset moaning about something they know nothing about but reckon should probably be stopped.

Given that no one has cast any aspersions on you personally for the fact you like it, merely expressed differing views on the source material, is that sort of response really justified?

And "know nothing about"? I've got two severely disabled relatives, but we can disappear up our own arses having a "some of my best mates are disabled" bollocks contest.

Different people react differently to different things. I'm not sure that requires name calling, does it?

you fucking spacker.

DYSWIDT. ;)
"know nothing about" was referring to people who obviously haven't even watched the fucking programme in question before offering their opinion on it.

Oh, well, that's a fine basis for proffering that sort of opinion on other people, then. Even if they have actually all seen it.

Carry on.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:19 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38667
I haven't seen your arse and I wouldn't want to watch that for half an hour


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:26 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16641
Yeah, fuck this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:26 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
DavPaz wrote:
I haven't seen your arse and I wouldn't want to watch that for half an hour

yes, yes you would.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:27 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
markg wrote:
Yeah, fuck this.

Wotevs, eh.

Seriously, I wasn't trying to start an argument, I just thought you were a little needlessly punchy.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:31 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16641
It's not you or really anyone, it's just this place has basically been not a lot except depressing this week. Can't be arsed at the mo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 22:39 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49367
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
It's because I've not been here.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:13 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
markg wrote:
"know nothing about" was referring to people who obviously haven't even watched the fucking programme in question before offering their opinion on it.


I can't speak for others but I have watched at least as much as the C4 commissioning editor must have done in order to order more episodes after the pilot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:18 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38667
This is all becoming a bit ridiculous now.

The soul has been ripped out of this place and I'm fucking pissed off that we let it happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:23 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Blame WTB. And Davpaz.

Fuck's sake, Mark, really? To the point of doing a Cavey and deleting your avatar?

It's not that bad. This place is exactly the same as it's always been, only with less me than there was 18 months ago. Good thing, surely?

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:28 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26104
I'm a bit confused by this thread :(

Some people like a show, some don't. People variously like or dislike that show for different reasons, and have shared their opinions.

I know people are annoyed about things that happened at the weekend, but I'm not sure how that relates to this thread in particular.

I don't know what else to say, but I'm worried that if this is how all threads are going to go there's not going to be much point in carrying on reading :'(

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:33 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
Mimi wrote:
I'm a bit confused by this thread :(

Some people like a show, some don't. People variously like or dislike that show for different reasons, and have shared their opinions.

I know people are annoyed about things that happened at the weekend, but I'm not sure how that relates to this thread in particular.

I don't know what else to say, but I'm worried that if this is how all threads are going to go there's not going to be much point in carrying on reading :'(



TOO MUCH WORRY IN THIS POST. THAT'S IT I'M LEAVING.

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:34 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
YES, FuCk ThIs I'm OfF

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:38 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26104
Hmmm. I guess I just don't understand.

OK, ignore me, I'm obviously missing something.

:P and/or :(

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:42 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
YES, FuCk ThIs I'm OfF


That's a bit poor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:46 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Fucking hardly. This has gone through ridiculous and out the other side into non-parodyable.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 23:46 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
I'm looking at Davpaz here, obv.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 0:30 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38667
I'll speak my mind in a different thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 0:33 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
It's a GIANT MIND AND CAN'T BE CONTAINED.

Ahem.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:05 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48913
Location: Cheshire
Conciller resigns after saying "that disabled children should be "put down" because they cost the authority too much money".

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:40 
Filthy Junkie Bitch

Joined: 17th Dec, 2008
Posts: 8293
MaliA wrote:
Conciller resigns after saying "that disabled children should be "put down" because they cost the authority too much money".

I refuse to believe that this is a complete story. Unfortunately, the only contradictory response is his own defence, which is therefore discredited and not reported in detail anyway.

However, the story goes that he said this to a Disable Rights campaigner. This is variously reported as either a 'Final Solution' suggestion or actively mocking the disabled. I suggest that it is neither. He says that he make the response angry after coming out of a meeting discussing council cuts, and therefore am extremely inclined to take his word that this was an off colour joke at his frustration as to how the proposed cuts (by others) would fall on disabled children.

I'd be less inclined to take that view if he had said it to someone who wasn't a disabled rights campaigner. The idea though that he would say that, to her, in any other spirit is simply ludicrous, whatever type of twat he may be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:58 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48913
Location: Cheshire
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Conciller resigns after saying "that disabled children should be "put down" because they cost the authority too much money".

I refuse to believe that this is a complete story. Unfortunately, the only contradictory response is his own defence, which is therefore discredited and not reported in detail anyway.

However, the story goes that he said this to a Disable Rights campaigner. This is variously reported as either a 'Final Solution' suggestion or actively mocking the disabled. I suggest that it is neither. He says that he make the response angry after coming out of a meeting discussing council cuts, and therefore am extremely inclined to take his word that this was an off colour joke at his frustration as to how the proposed cuts (by others) would fall on disabled children.

I'd be less inclined to take that view if he had said it to someone who wasn't a disabled rights campaigner. The idea though that he would say that, to her, in any other spirit is simply ludicrous, whatever type of twat he may be.


According to #axzz2MBnr4aSl" class="postlink">this, the remark was made in 2011.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 13:19 
Filthy Junkie Bitch

Joined: 17th Dec, 2008
Posts: 8293
Cornwall thinks it is currently 2011. Surprised that they've caught up that far.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 13:24 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48913
Location: Cheshire
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Cornwall thinks it is currently 2011. Surprised that they've caught up that far.


Sweet, I'm still 21, then.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 13:32 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17971
Location: Oxfordshire
Meanwhile, the Lord Mayor of Oxford is censured for possibly (the councillors are unsure on what happened) telling a 13 year old she looked sexy. (Oxford Mail).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 13:33 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17971
Location: Oxfordshire
Kern wrote:
Meanwhile, the Lord Mayor of Oxford is censured for possibly (the councillors are unsure on what happened) telling a 13 year old she looked sexy. (Oxford Mail).


(EDIT: I suppose this should go into the 'Disgraced DJ (Deceased)' thread)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 16:34 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27354
Location: Kidbrooke
MaliA wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Cornwall thinks it is currently 2011. Surprised that they've caught up that far.


Sweet, I'm still 21, then.


O RLY?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 17:16 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-21613233

He is bringing Brent back for Comic Relief.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 18:28 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17971
Location: Oxfordshire
'The Office' is over ten years old? Blimey.

In my third year at university, we'd go to the Goats for cheap beer, then head to a friend's room and watch an episode of 'The Office'. We did this almost every night. Happy times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 18:50 
User avatar
ugvm'er at heart...

Joined: 4th Mar, 2010
Posts: 22397
Kern wrote:
'The Office' is over ten years old? Blimey.

In my third year at university, we'd go to the Goats for cheap beer, then head to a friend's room and watch an episode of 'The Office'. We did this almost every night. Happy times.


Watching and dreaming of your future working lives? High hopes indeed! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 20:30 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Trooper wrote:
Kern wrote:
'The Office' is over ten years old? Blimey.

In my third year at university, we'd go to the Goats for cheap beer, then head to a friend's room and watch an episode of 'The Office'. We did this almost every night. Happy times.


Watching and dreaming of your future working lives? High hopes indeed! :D



I remember when the Office was on and I had been in IT a couple of years. Happy days, I looked forward to work on a Monday I enjoyed it that much, now I’m a bit jaded as a manager and I’m not as into technology as I used to be, too many people tell me technology things these days where once I would be telling them.

Still I pays pretty well and I enjoy it more that I dislike it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 20:37 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17971
Location: Oxfordshire
Trooper wrote:
Kern wrote:
'The Office' is over ten years old? Blimey.

In my third year at university, we'd go to the Goats for cheap beer, then head to a friend's room and watch an episode of 'The Office'. We did this almost every night. Happy times.


Watching and dreaming of your future working lives? High hopes indeed! :D


:'(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 16:20 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38667
Quote:
"What makes Derek a different kind of sitcom - if it is even a sitcom - is its sincerity. Certainly the last few years, and I'm responsible for a lot of it, there's been this comedy of cynicism and irony. I've tried to leave that behind. There's more sincerity, which sometimes confuses people because they're looking for the undercutting joke."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27019524

Well, there you go. Sincerity is the new sneer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 16:39 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69725
Location: Your Mum
Is he still saying that Derek isn't meant to be mentally disabled? Goodness.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 18:37 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
I feel like Derek is an attempt at looking at an issue with kindness (and written with extremely broad, emotive, strokes that at times border on a certain cynicism) but with no real understanding of the material.

Gervais has clear history with old people' homes - his mother worked at one (I believe) and his appreciation of them is obvious. That shines through as a certain believability in that aspect of the show.

But his treatment of Derek, whilst it is well meaning, is written from an understanding of people with Special Educational Needs that has come from little to no interaction with such people. It's like if I wrote a sitcom about why Muslims are people too. It would have it heart in the right place but it would show no real understanding of a culture I have little to no experience of.

Because most people don't have experience of people with SEN then they either a) assume its fine or b) have a icky feeling they can't articulate about the show.

I certainly feel like the latter. The show, whether cynically or not, has a good message - but it talks about material we can't judge the validity of, and we have little faith in gervais to represent well.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 19:25 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Dr Lave wrote:
I feel like Derek is an attempt at looking at an issue with kindness (and written with extremely broad, emotive, strokes that at times border on a certain cynicism) but with no real understanding of the material.

Gervais has clear history with old people' homes - his mother worked at one (I believe) and his appreciation of them is obvious. That shines through as a certain believability in that aspect of the show.

But his treatment of Derek, whilst it is well meaning, is written from an understanding of people with Special Educational Needs that has come from little to no interaction with such people. It's like if I wrote a sitcom about why Muslims are people too. It would have it heart in the right place but it would show no real understanding of a culture I have little to no experience of.

Because most people don't have experience of people with SEN then they either a) assume its fine or b) have a icky feeling they can't articulate about the show.

I certainly feel like the latter. The show, whether cynically or not, has a good message - but it talks about material we can't judge the validity of, and we have little faith in gervais to represent well.

:this:

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 22:29 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
I think that Kev is the best thing in this show

This is from S2 and they didn't put it in as they couldn't film it for laughing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISw_0He14ZM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 22:33 
Excellent Member

Joined: 5th Dec, 2010
Posts: 3353
Quote:
'The Office' is over ten years old? Blimey.


I work in Slough and went for a walk at lunchtime today

This http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/16436 has all been knocked down now!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derek
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 23:21 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
All I know is that any time any of us saw that fucker in the ULU bar mumping cheap beer he was a loud, obnoxious cunt.

more so than me, I mean.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Squirt and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.