asfish wrote:
But how does MS get stick for IE on Windows 7 when its now virtually impossible to put music onto your touch without ITunes or some Apple runtime. Before they moved to the touch range there were a number of great apps that would let you quickly put music on the iPod
Most issues regarding Microsoft stem from it abusing (not merely having) a monopoly position. Within Windows, it at one point stole QuickTime code while simultaneously fucking QuickTime. Elsewhere, it attempted to subvert web standards in order to make IE the default/standard, because its OS ran on the vast majority of PCs. (The funny thing today, of course, is that MS is being really good regarding standards and IE 10, bar perhaps integrating Flash. IE10 looks like it's going to be a great browser.) Apple has never had such a monopoly in any industry, let alone abused it. People have pointed at iPods/iTunes, but they play relatively open formats and never had 'all' the market. Additionally, iTunes was a device conduit—there was nothing stopping you using an alternate MP3 player, which is, after all, an accessory.
Quote:
It’s a shit load easier to use another browser on Windows 7 than it is to use an alternative to ITunes
But you can use a different device. You can't for Apple's own products, but Apple's products are not the market. In tablets, they're a majority, but smartphones? Not even close.
GovernmentYard wrote:
First big launch after he fucks off and look what we've got.
The new iPad?
But on Maps, I agree with Gassée—the problem is in part Apple's tedious boasting, rather than having a little humility. Had they gone with "We think it's really important to have beautiful maps that we can improve with your help." and outlined both the positives and the existing problems, slapping on a beta label… well, Apple would have still been hit but not as hard. But by going BEST MAPS EVAR, Apple deserves a kicking. That all said, people still don't know why this situation happened at all. There are so many rumours swirling around that we can't tell if this was Apple arrogance (the default assumption), Google holding back data or making demands (just as likely, given the company's history), or a combination of factors. One thing's for sure, though: this is very Apple. It likes to control the things it does—see the Ax chips. It's just in this case, it royally fucked up. (That said, I'm seeing an increasing number of reports stating Maps for iOS 6 are in some ways an improvement over the Google-data version. The main issue appears to be inconsistency rather than out-and-out crapness, with the datasets in some European countries being particularly poor.) Also, I wish people would stop reporting that iOS 5 had Google's app—it didn't. It had Google data in Apple's own app.
Quote:
Come to think of it, how come the Safari issue isn't fucking huge?
What issue is there? There are alternative browsers. There isn't an alternative core—you use WebKit—but in what way is Apple abusing that position? (There are actually some arguments here, notably in the way Apple messed up caching in iOS 6, but with iOS 6.0.1 or 6.0.2 we'll find out if that was a bug or deliberate. My guess: bug. Other arguments stem from Safari alone having access to faster JavaScript capabilities, and that doesn't really have a counter argument, but it's still not in a Microsoft-style ballpark. But are there other problems? And don't anyone dare say "Flash".)
The Last Salmon Man wrote:
The main problem isn't that Apple's Map are bad (and I'm not denying they're not), but Google's are so so good that we've got become used to that being the norm.
Quite, and even today, Google Maps aren't always accurate, yet it took years to get here. Mapping is hard. The problem for Apple is I'd say it has three-to-six months tops to sort this mess out to an acceptable standard (i.e. accurate routing, mostly accurate buildings, better satellite imagery), but then it certainly has enough money to chuck at the problem.
Quote:
I don't think this is the end of days for Apple though. It'll get fixed and people have short memories.
This. That all said, Apple's QC has been an issue for years now. OS X is increasingly buggy, and I do wonder whether Cook runs too tight a ship at times. But then that was also the case when Jobs was still alive.