Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 17:25 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Drinks industry to face new laws, possibly.

Quote:
Ministers have told the drinks industry to act more responsibly or face new laws governing alcohol sales.

A review of retailers showed many were not following a voluntary code calling on them to display details on units and to encourage sensible drinking.

Ministers have responded by launching a consultation on proposed laws covering happy hours, promotion and labelling.


Fine, fine. Although can the government please actually enforce some of the existing laws first, like the ones about not serving drunks? I have never, ever seen someone refused for being pissed.

More irritatingly, though:

Quote:
It comes as figures for England suggest the scale of alcohol-related hospital admissions is much higher than thought.

Oooh - well, that's a bit scary if so.

Quote:
NHS Information Centre data had suggested the figure for hospital admissions was just over 200,000 last year.

That still seems quite a few, though, if those are admissions for medical conditions directly caused by alcohol consumption.

Quote:
But this only covered illness caused directly by alcohol such as liver disease.

Well, so it should, surely?

Quote:
Department of Health figures for England showed that when deaths from cancer, heart disease and strokes were taken into account the total topped 800,000 last year.
What the fudge? We're now blaming alcohol for deaths resulting from diseases which might conceivably in some cases be partially contributed to by alcohol? Or where only a "safe" level of alcohol has been taken by the dead person? Or in which alcohol may have played no effect whatsoever? Or where the dead person might not even have drunk at all? And we're using those deaths as an example of how binge drinking and excessive alcohol consumption is bad, m'kay?

Good chutney-ferreting lord.

Quote:
The figure represents a doubling of the numbers in the past four years, leaving the cost to the NHS standing at £2.7bn.

Well, yes, if we add in every death caused by every other thing in the universe which might in some cases have alcohol as a causative factor I'm sure we can get that number to 100% of all deaths in the UK. Hell, some people who commit suicide do it when drunk, so we should add every single one of those in too, eh? And everyone who dies from an accident, because some accidents are caused by alcohol.

STUPID STUPID FUCKERS.

Quote:
Doctors said drinking levels were now a major health concern.

Says one of the booziest of the professions. Fuck off.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 17:32 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7325
Location: Behind you
I find it doesn't pay to get too worked up over these stupid reports. Honestly, most news delivery mediums, including some of the more respectable broadsheets, come across like verbatim press releases nowadays.

And statistics are usually only as good as the metric in which they were taken is fully understood by all parties reporting the findings.

In other words, this has already been turned into a load of bollocks scare mongering. Why, though? That's the question that intrigues me more (which isn't much) :)

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 17:37 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
You know, 5000 people died in car crashes in Britain last year but if Iraqi victims of suicide bombs are added that's 100,000 people who did in car crashed in Britain last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:08 
User avatar
lazy eye patch

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3955
Location: Telford, UK
DBSnappa wrote:
In other words, this has already been turned into a load of bollocks scare mongering. Why, though? That's the question that intrigues me more (which isn't much) :)

For similar reasons that this was already done with cannabis and, to a lesser extent, cigarettes.

Make bed
Enter bed
Sleep in bed.

_________________
Photographs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:13 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17967
Location: Oxfordshire
Did anyone notice this article ( http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_a ... 697975.ece ) in the Thunderer last year, which claimed that recommended drink limits were made up on the spot?

Of course, one could argue that these figures serve the same purpose as speed limits in that despite numerous variables (weather, traffic, time of day) the smooth operation of the law requires some benchmark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:35 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69711
Location: Your Mum
I honestly don't see the point in drinking alcohol unless you intend to get drunk.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:37 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7325
Location: Behind you
Kern wrote:
Did anyone notice this article ( http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_a ... 697975.ece ) in the Thunderer last year, which claimed that recommended drink limits were made up on the spot?


Not in the thundering darling, I couldn't possibly read that. Anyway, joking aside, I saw something similar, but this tale has been doing the rounds for some years now. It probably is true, as most "scientists" exist in macrocosms of anonymity and they get all excited and flustered if a person from the 4th estate contacts them for a quote. Basically, most Journos don't understand science and scientists don't understand journalism - it's bound to get watered down and spun into an eye-grabbing story and it frequently does. The alcohol limits are almost certainly bollocks, as are all "one size" fits all remedies, solutions, hats, t-shirts etc. What might not be being reported is the correlation between alcohol abuse and other stimulants, be it caffeine, red bull or the nadir, which is cocaine. All of these, to some extent, allay the motor skills distorting effects of alcohol (coke in particular) and allow the user to carry on drinking waaaaay beyond the realms of sensibility. Just from my experience of London, I would say cocaine is a lot more prevalent than most people would think (and I suspect it isn't isolated to the capitol) and it's usually taken as a means to allow the drinking to continue. As is becoming a popular mantra with this government, they're looking at a few bad apples who over do it and applying stupid fucking legislation that we all should adhere to.

We're governed by fools, I tells ya.

Quote:
Of course, one could argue that these figures serve the same purpose as speed limits in that despite numerous variables (weather, traffic, time of day) the smooth operation of the law requires some benchmark.


Lowest common denominator. The problem isn't smooth running as much as some bright young thing in politics realising that he can make a name for himself by exploiting these benchmarks to add to the treasury coffers. Much like speeding fines, I envisage drunk fines for all and sundry soon. Let us ignore the reason why so many people drink too much, let's just view them as a means of making a few bucks for the treasury.

Or something.

Anyway, where did I put my beer?

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:38 
User avatar
Excellent Painter

Joined: 30th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7325
Location: Behind you
Grim... wrote:
I honestly don't see the point in drinking alcohol unless you intend to get drunk.

Hmmm. I never drink to get drunk but frequently get drunk because I drink.

_________________
twitter || website
Malibu Stacy. Everybody's favourite back seat driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:43 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16628
It's actually pretty astonishing how in many places the negative effects of alcohol are brushed under the carpet for economic reasons. The hospital where I work has been the subject of many BBC documentaries and news items but the fact that a huge number of admissions to A&E are due to alcohol never gets a mention. This is because the various local authorities agree between each other not to feature it, because it's Blackpool and they don't want to scare away the tourists. We're actually one of the worst places in the UK for alcohol abuse yet stories about it almost never feature in the local papers.

So on the one hand I can see that the article Chris mentions may be a bit of a scare story but I know that the media also gets outright manipulated into downplaying it too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 18:45 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49244
I personally view the "self-harm" effects of booze as exactly the same as those of cigarettes - the government needs to put up or shut up, ban it or fuck off. Punitive pricing, banning happy hour, restricting advertising? Get fucked.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 19:14 
User avatar
lazy eye patch

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3955
Location: Telford, UK
markg wrote:
It's actually pretty astonishing how in many places the negative effects of alcohol are brushed under the carpet for economic reasons.

Whereas the positive effects of cannabis are brushed under the carpet for economic reasons. Not trying to change the subject, but it makes an interesting counterpoint, I feel.

_________________
Photographs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 20:02 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
Grim... wrote:
I honestly don't see the point in drinking alcohol unless you intend to get drunk.


Amen to that. Whenever I'm out or over at someone's house and I'm driving/riding home, they always say 'well, you can have one drink if you like, I suppose, because we're eating soon and you're not leaving for three hours'. But what's the fucking point? One beer?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 20:04 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17161
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Because I like the taste of beer, mainly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 20:05 
User avatar
lazy eye patch

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3955
Location: Telford, UK
MetalAngel wrote:
But what's the fucking point? One beer?

Because it's pleasant to be lightly numbed/buzzed just slightly, and so as to enjoy the sharp, refreshing taste of your beverage? No, really.

_________________
Photographs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 21:32 
User avatar
making out to faces of death

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 2686
Location: Sadville
There won't really be any information on alcohol consumption for admitted patients with those diseases mentioned (unless it's *chronic* alcoholism), so it just an exercise in assuming to inflate the figures.

_________________
Me flickr
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 21:33 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69711
Location: Your Mum
I get that, and I understand that some people like the taste of alcholic drinks (as do I) but I don't think there's an alcoholic drink (cocktails excluded) that tastes as good as Fentimans Cola, or apple juice. I love apple juice.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 21:35 
User avatar
making out to faces of death

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 2686
Location: Sadville
Staropramen.

_________________
Me flickr
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 21:47 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Vodka and Fentimans


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 21:54 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
Grim... wrote:
I honestly don't see the point in drinking alcohol unless you intend to get drunk.


Aye, but define "drunk". I have a couple - literally, maybe three or four (definitely not pints. Last time I had four pints in a fairly short night it nearly killed me), and will stop when I'm comfortable and perhaps a little daft. I learned my limits years ago and will stop before or when I reach them. Most of my friends are much the same, and we'll rarely get stupidly drunk.

Recently though, I've come to realise that there are plenty of people who think that they're not drunk unless they're literally paralytic. Not just teenagers still getting used to booze, but people my age and far older who think they're sober as long as they can walk, even though to any reasonable eye they've been pissed out of their head and talking embarassing drunken shite for hours.

Also, malibu, pineapple and lemon juice tastes lovely. I'll occasionally have one or two (literally, again) just because it's tasty and relaxing. It's also easier to buy a bottle of malibu every year or so than it is to buy some form of coconut without having to throw most of it away.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 22:04 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
AceAceBaby wrote:
There won't really be any information on alcohol consumption for admitted patients with those diseases mentioned (unless it's *chronic* alcoholism), so it just an exercise in assuming to inflate the figures.

Yeah, that was my point, really. They've just added *everyone* with cancer into the figure, because *some* people's cancer has been caused or aggravated by alcohol and (so I assume their thinking goes) therefore potentially they *all* have.

Cretins.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 22:07 
User avatar
lazy eye patch

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3955
Location: Telford, UK
Grim... wrote:
I get that, and I understand that some people like the taste of alcholic drinks (as do I) but I don't think there's an alcoholic drink (cocktails excluded) that tastes as good as Fentimans Cola, or apple juice. I love apple juice.

But I don't see why that means there's no point therefore in drinking unless it's to get shit-faced? Hmm.

_________________
Photographs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 23:07 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69711
Location: Your Mum
Because I like apple juice more. And the 'tingly feeling' just says 'drink more' to me, TBH.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 23:14 
Awesome
User avatar
Yes

Joined: 6th Apr, 2008
Posts: 12334
You could try putting vodka in your apple juice? The vodka tastes of next to nothing, so your apple juice become nicely alcoholic.

_________________
Always proof read carefully in case you any words out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 23:21 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
Mr Russ wrote:
You could try putting vodka in your apple juice? The vodka tastes of next to nothing, so your apple juice become nicely alcoholic.


That sounds utterly revolting. Vodka does have a taste. It's just less deeply revolting than most other spirits.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Government booze death statistics now include "might"s
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 23:27 
User avatar
lazy eye patch

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3955
Location: Telford, UK
Grim... wrote:
Because I like apple juice more. And the 'tingly feeling' just says 'drink more' to me, TBH.

Then you have a burgeoning drug addiction and should consider seeking professional advice, sir.

_________________
Photographs


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Findus Fop and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.