Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
What if we 'put this shit to bed' in the 1800s because that's when we progressed from subsistence farming to industrialised living -- and what if that's what the Chinese are doing right now? I think it's pretty widely accepted that conditions for a Foxconn worker are far in advance of a paddy field worker, whilst being harsher than a Western worker. So how do you propose a nation jump from paddy fields to Western standards without passing through Foxconn? Would you prefer it to be paddy fields forever?
The thing is though, we've already done this before, we know that the path to a modern industrial society can exact a massive toll on the workers who basically prop the whole thing up for the massive enrichment of the few and the minor enrichment, relatively speaking, of the many.
(This surely is not debatable, BTW.)
Terrible working conditions, no paid holidays, no sick pay, no pensions, child labour, no job security, no maternity or paternity rights, unfortunate death or injury being part of the job with no compensation etc etc.
Workers in the Western world fought, and fought hard, to establish these basic rights to a decent working life, through the political systems of the time and organised labour.
Hardcore capitalists, doing what they do best and focusing entirely on making as much money for themselves as they possibly could, simply decided to move to parts of the world where such rules weren't established.
The advancement of technology over the years has allowed countries primarily in the East to move from the production of textiles and lo-tech, to what is now some of the highest technology on the planet - and all the while the maximum profits are extracted from the lowest paid and most abused workers they can possibly find.
It's not a binary choice, it's not 'paddy fields forever' or 'industrialise up a bit' - if Western capitalist forces had the mindset to do so, they could easily spare the workers in companies such as Foxconn the agonies and misery that workers in the Industrial Revolution went through 200 years ago.
Problem is, that's not how to extract the most money from the situation, so they won't do it. And that's why Apple has more money in the bank than the US Treasury has funds available to it as extra debt.