ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
I'd like to think that I may have had a more balanced view on this, until last night as I walked up my street and a group of 10 youths (I hate that word) of mixed race, all appearing to be under 18, were walking down the road discussing where they were going 'shopping'. Tooled up. Unfortunately for them, the petrol station had just turned off the taps.
What happened in many cases last night (in my view) had nothing to do with the police, or the guy being shot. It was to do with the realisation that after Tottenham, and then Brixton, enough bodies operating in the same area could do so with (immediate) impunity, as the police would be overwhelmed.
Yeah, I think I was saying something similar to that a page or two back, and I completely agree.
Quote:
I don't think either, that 100% of us condemning this could say with absolute certainty that if we had been 16, and in that place at that time, that we wouldn't have joined in under the circumstances. I refer to the Lavender Hill looting at Clapham Junction for potential evidence of that.
No, actually I can. I certainly would never have got involved in that sort of thing. Ever.
I’ve always been a law abiding person, other than underage drinking, but even that I did with the right level of fear of being caught, which prevented me from getting plastered and wandering around causing fights like teenagers do these days.
There was something in a Terry Pratchett novel about how when you compare the number of people to the number of police, it seems miraculous that people don’t realise they have the weight of numbers and could, if they wanted, do what they like. Vimes put the miraculous control down to the little policeman in everyone’s heads, looking over their shoulder as it were, and when that fear of authority disappears, the people realise how little power the state actually has to control them.
As to
why all of this is happening, I think DavPaz has hit on part of it, but the "me too" opportunism combined with the growing lack of giving a shit seems, at least to this admittedly partial observer, to be the main reason. Kids have been growing ever more happy to commit fairly horrible crimes - witness the rash of stabbings in London a couple of years back, the happy slapping broohaha (although I accept that may not have been as prevalent as oportrayed) and so on.
However, why
that may be is another question. As someone said earlier, SA maybe, or Grim..., the parents are certainly to blame here, but who's to blame for those parents being shit?
I dunno.
I also don't see how this is going to end well. This isn't like the poll tax riots, where there was a civil uprising in relation to a specific issue (albeit the straw that broke the came's back after Thatcher's years of beating the working class), where the government can just say, “Okay, we give in, here’s all the money”. This just seems a massive underlying malaise, and a realisation that there’s a potential outlet for it.
And on a more practical level, I really can’t see what the police can do to prevent this happening again tonight, given that they’ve already been doing all they can and are overstretched. I just hope Cameron doesn't get all gung ho in his cobra meeting to show that he was thinking about all this
really hard while supping his cappucino in Tuscany.