Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:35 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69724
Location: Your Mum
Because I've got a question: Do the older kids (ie. the ones born in September) do better than the younger kids (born in August the next year) generally do better on account of them being practically a year older?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:36 
User avatar
What-ho, chaps!

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2139
I was one of the younger kids. God some of the older kids were dense as hell.

_________________
[www.mrdictionary.net]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:37 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
Grim... wrote:
Because I've got a question: Do the older kids (ie. the ones born in September) do better than the younger kids (born in August the next year) generally do better on account of them being practically a year older?


i never noticed anything.









PS: i teached in the university


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:37 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48911
Location: Cheshire
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/oct/2 ... .education

Quote:
It has long been one of the most hotly debated subjects at the school gate but a study has now confirmed what many parents suspected: summer babies are significantly less likely to be academically successful than their older classmates.

The research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) found that children born in August do worse in school tests, are more likely to struggle with reading and writing and then drop out when they reach 16.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:38 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17161
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
It pretty much depends on how well the parents spend preparing their kids

4 years of awesome parenting > 5 years of rubbish parenting


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:38 
User avatar
What-ho, chaps!

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2139
Mr Dave wrote:
It pretty much depends on how well the parents spend preparing their kids

4 years of awesome parenting > 5 years of rubbish parenting


Yep.

_________________
[www.mrdictionary.net]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:39 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Lots of theoretical discussion today.

Surely they must have some advantage, although here's one answer for you Grim...

Remember my fuckoff clever physics mate? He's an August baby, and was one of the youngest in my year. I'm a November baby, so I had a fair 9 months on him, but it clearly didn't help me one damn bit.

Much of a muchness really. Some people homeschool their kids who then pass their degrees when they're 12. Weirdos.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:40 
User avatar
Lord Of The Powerchord

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 174
Location: Merrie England
I reckon there must be some research results for this knocking around on the net, but I'd guess that the proportion of pupils in one or the other group in a class has an effect on the performance of those in the minority rather than there being any absolute answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:40 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69724
Location: Your Mum
Oh yeah, I know they'll be plenty of cases each way, I was wondering about the 'general' result. I will read that article, though - cheers.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:42 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69724
Location: Your Mum
Quote:
Of today's eight, nine and 10-year olds 80% of girls born in September achieved the expected grades in their tests when they were seven compared with 53% of those born in August.

Some 80% of September-born boys reached the expected level at seven compared with 47% of those born in August.


Cor.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:43 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Grim... wrote:
Quote:
Of today's eight, nine and 10-year olds 80% of girls born in September achieved the expected grades in their tests when they were seven compared with 53% of those born in August.

Some 80% of September-born boys reached the expected level at seven compared with 47% of those born in August.


Cor.


Eight, Nine, 10?

That must've been written by an august-born thicky.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:46 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
nynfortoo wrote:

Eight, Nine, 10?

That must've been written by an august-born thicky.


Actually I think that is established journalistic guidelines. You type the whole word for numbers under 10, and then use the numerical version for numbers of 10 and above.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:50 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
ComicalGnomes wrote:
nynfortoo wrote:

Eight, Nine, 10?

That must've been written by an august-born thicky.


Actually I think that is established journalistic guidelines. You type the whole word for numbers under 10, and then use the numerical version for numbers of 10 and above.


That's just daft, especially if you mix them in one sentence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:52 
User avatar
Legendary Boogeyman

Joined: 22nd Dec, 2010
Posts: 8175
Don't ask me, I didn't invent it, but I recall reading the guidelines when I used to write public-facing content for the uni.

_________________
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
Pretty much everyone agrees with Gnomes, really, it's just some are too right on to admit it. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 16:59 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
ComicalGnomes wrote:


Much of a muchness really. Some people homeschool their kids who then pass their degrees when they're 12. Weirdos.


Or antiques dealers:

Image

WARNING: DO NOT EVER DO A GOOGLE IMAGES SEARCH ON JAMES HARRIES. YOU DON'T KNOW THE DAMAGE BRINGING YOU THE ABOVE PICTURE CAUSED!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 17:03 
User avatar
Most Excellent Pagan Wench

Joined: 3rd Apr, 2008
Posts: 361
Location: Norfolk, UK
The only advantages come from upbringing and genes imo.
Age matters not.

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 17:03 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27354
Location: Kidbrooke
Not to mention that the older ones tend to be better at sports, and as such more socially acceptable at an early age.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 17:17 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
Curiosity wrote:
Not to mention that the older ones tend to be better at sports, and as such more socially acceptable at an early age.


Not always true. The youngest boy in our class at secondry school by a good 9 months is now considered to be one of our countries greatest sportsman. Well by people who like kicking eggs around and buggering each other in the showers anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 17:37 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
yes it can have a big difference. up to 12 months difference when you are 60 months old is a good 20% longer to have been doing stuff. It obviously depends on how well you've been spending that extra 20% and what you've got in terms of brains and so on. I've also seen some kids who are still wanting an afternoon nap, that obviously impacts on how well they can learn...

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 19:27 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
Grim... wrote:
Because I've got a question: Do the older kids (ie. the ones born in September) do better than the younger kids (born in August the next year) generally do better on account of them being practically a year older?


I was lead to believe this, however I know lots of bright augustians. In short; I don't think it practically matters. Just teach your kid well and he'll do well. Those extra few months will mean nothing.

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:12 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
I'd imagine the older ones get a slight advantage at the beginning, as 10 months to a 4-year old is a lot more significant in terms of development, but less so after a year or two, when everyone will have reached the same plateu.

However, starting younger could also mean you have a better chance, as you get into the habit of learning things regularly earlier on, so the pattern is more established in your mind as it comes earlier in your development. I'd imagine that this effect is limited somewhat though by the disadvantages in confidence, social skills, likelihood of having played with other children and physical stature that the situation would also likely entail.

I was born in July, and I'm at least as intelligent as a 9-year old born in September. Some of my best friends are black, too.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:40 
User avatar
Lord Of The Powerchord

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 174
Location: Merrie England
sinister agent wrote:
I was born in July, and I'm at least as intelligent as a 9-year old born in September.

Y'know, for a grown man, that's not brilliant. [ninja smiley*]



*We need a ninja smiley, incidentally. Or Chuck Norris.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Any Teachers around?
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:54 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
RuySan wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Because I've got a question: Do the older kids (ie. the ones born in September) do better than the younger kids (born in August the next year) generally do better on account of them being practically a year older?


i never noticed anything.









PS: i teached in the university


O RLY?

I don't think it makes a huge difference. Given the range of capabilities that primary school classes include anyway, you aren't going to be left behind for such a little age difference. I was an August kid and didn't find it a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo, The Greys and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.