Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 16:55 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
My mother-in-law want to give my brother-in-law a camcorder for christmas and asked for my opinion. I know shit about camcorders, so i'm asking you, the endless source of wisdom that is the Beteo hivemind.

Are the good brands for digital cameras the same as for camcorders? Are there any specs that i should be aware of? It's supposed to be something fairly cheap, maximum 300€ or something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 16:57 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49293
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Chinny!

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 17:01 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I asked a similar question a while back but my budget was £50. I got an excellent JVC "mini-dv" (which means digital tape) recorder off ebay for £23 in the end.
This type all have a firewire socket which you can get the video out of without needing any special driver on the PC. Works a treat.

It's all about the solid-state ones these days admittedly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 17:13 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
kalmar wrote:
I asked a similar question a while back but my budget was £50. I got an excellent JVC "mini-dv" (which means digital tape) recorder off ebay for £23 in the end.
This type all have a firewire socket which you can get the video out of without needing any special driver on the PC. Works a treat.

It's all about the solid-state ones these days admittedly.


DV is still good! Don't fall for the marketing!

There are great bargains to be had and on paper at least the tech specs of DV are better than some of the solid state cameras. DV is also dead easy to edit unlike MPEG variants. OK so I now edit on an MPEG 2 varient (XDCAM) but if you are on a weedy home computer DV is great. Lets face it I was editing DV happily on a P166 ten years ago.

+ You can stick a DV tape on the shelf and keep it for years. No need to backup your footage or run the risk of losing the footage. Decent Sony tapes are as little as 2 quid an hour and anyone who reuses DV tape is a cheapskate of the highest order.

Also keep in mind that a good SD camcorder will be better than so called "HD" camcorders. Just because you have the pixels doesn't mean you have the resolution. I speak as someone who owns 2 professional HD cameras and my newer more expensive one is far better than the older one.

If you do go for solid state, ensure you get something that edits to an established standard. Nothing worse than to have an OS upgrade and then find the driver for your camera doesn't work and EvilJapanese Corp won't be producing a new driver.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 20:29 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
I can't offer a recommendation in that price bracket, but I've got a Canon HF-20 and am happy enough with it. It's a 1080p solid-state thing, and it's lovely, although HD video is a pain in the arse to edit on anything less than an uber-beast of a machine.

FWIW2, Sony Vegas Movie Studio is bloody great for video editing - I much prefer it to Premiere Elements. It's literally just a cut-down version of Vegas Pro - fewer tracks, a bit less automation, that sort of thing - unlike Premiere Elements which is all cluttered up with big idiot-friendly buttons that mask all the useful functionality.

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 21:46 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:
I can't offer a recommendation in that price bracket, but I've got a Canon HF-20 and am happy enough with it. It's a 1080p solid-state thing, and it's lovely, although HD video is a pain in the arse to edit on anything less than an uber-beast of a machine.

FWIW2, Sony Vegas Movie Studio is bloody great for video editing - I much prefer it to Premiere Elements. It's literally just a cut-down version of Vegas Pro - fewer tracks, a bit less automation, that sort of thing - unlike Premiere Elements which is all cluttered up with big idiot-friendly buttons that mask all the useful functionality.


[coughs] Final Cut Express if you are a Mac user.

Your footage is a pain in the arse to edit probably because it's an MPEG4 codec. Takes alot of grunt to edit on the fly which is why professional kit uses MPEG 2, and even then you are better off doing your intermediate rendering and final rendering into Apple Prores, which is a proper frame based codec.

It amuses me to see all these "HD" camcoders on the market when frankly the optics are barely any better than their SD counterparts. Pixels count for jack if you have a lens that cost a fiver.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 21:59 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
Check out this site BTW:

http://www.camcorderinfo.co.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 22:19 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
chinnyhill10 wrote:
parm wrote:
I can't offer a recommendation in that price bracket, but I've got a Canon HF-20 and am happy enough with it. It's a 1080p solid-state thing, and it's lovely, although HD video is a pain in the arse to edit on anything less than an uber-beast of a machine.

FWIW2, Sony Vegas Movie Studio is bloody great for video editing - I much prefer it to Premiere Elements. It's literally just a cut-down version of Vegas Pro - fewer tracks, a bit less automation, that sort of thing - unlike Premiere Elements which is all cluttered up with big idiot-friendly buttons that mask all the useful functionality.


[coughs] Final Cut Express if you are a Mac user.

Your footage is a pain in the arse to edit probably because it's an MPEG4 codec. Takes alot of grunt to edit on the fly which is why professional kit uses MPEG 2, and even then you are better off doing your intermediate rendering and final rendering into Apple Prores, which is a proper frame based codec.

It amuses me to see all these "HD" camcoders on the market when frankly the optics are barely any better than their SD counterparts. Pixels count for jack if you have a lens that cost a fiver.


Oh, absolutely. The Canon I've got was specifically bought because the reviews said the lens was excellent and properly sharp. And yes, it's an AVCHD camcorder, which requires a shit-tonne of CPU grunt to edit. My quad-core box manages it okay, but my dual-core laptop struggles somewhat, especially if I've got any effects in there too (Red Giant Magic Bullet is bloody great, but more than doubles my rendering times...)

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 22:45 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
chinnyhill10 wrote:
[coughs] Final Cut Express if you are a Mac user.


I remain very impressed with iMovie, which is free with the Mac, having used it about 3 times only. The point being that I managed to make it do what I wanted each time, with a minimal level of swearing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 22:46 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:
(Red Giant Magic Bullet is bloody great, but more than doubles my rendering times...)


I won't ask how you obtained that. :attitude: :DD

Ensure GPU processing is enabled. Be warned though it only supports certain GPU's. From memory it's NVIDIA only however they may have revised that. With the right card it should be fairly nippy.

I run Colorista and you barely notice the extra rendering time even on the Macbook. GPU takes the strain. Magic Bullet is nice but Colorista (which is also by Red Giant) will give similar results if used properly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:27 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
chinnyhill10 wrote:
parm wrote:
(Red Giant Magic Bullet is bloody great, but more than doubles my rendering times...)


I won't ask how you obtained that. :attitude: :DD



Feel free to ask, I paid for it :) Got a 50% reduction for being an owner of Vegas, which made it just over £100, which I figured was reasonable.

Quote:
Ensure GPU processing is enabled. Be warned though it only supports certain GPU's. From memory it's NVIDIA only however they may have revised that. With the right card it should be fairly nippy.

I run Colorista and you barely notice the extra rendering time even on the Macbook. GPU takes the strain. Magic Bullet is nice but Colorista (which is also by Red Giant) will give similar results if used properly.


Magic Bullet requires GPU processing, in fact. Works on both my NVidia laptop and ATI desktop, though, although neither of them are especially kick-ass cards.

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:32 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69685
Location: Your Mum
Honestly, if you're not doing anything too advanced then Windows Movie Maker is a fine bit of software. Just remember to output it under the 'dv-avi' setting and then re-encode it how you like.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:52 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:

Magic Bullet requires GPU processing, in fact. Works on both my NVidia laptop and ATI desktop, though, although neither of them are especially kick-ass cards.


Didn't used to. Was a tick box in the preferences in After Effects.

I like Magic Bullet but it is slow and overpriced considering you get Apple Color included with Final Cut Studio these days.

The "film look" part of Magic Bullet is now rendered useless by the fact that most pro cameras can now shoot progressive happily enough anyway hence why Colorista is better for me. It was a nice trick to have though when we were all still stuck in the world of interlacing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 16:50 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Grim... wrote:
Honestly, if you're not doing anything too advanced then Windows Movie Maker is a fine bit of software.


:this: I'm surprised MS haven't made more fuss about Movie Maker in the way that it does with Media Player with numerous new versions of the latter.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 17:07 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10139
It's like Security Essentials - if they accidentally make something competent, they can't bundle or freely distribute it and shout about it without being hit with an anti-trust complaint.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:15 
Excellent Member

Joined: 14th Dec, 2009
Posts: 1
What is the best camcorder to record a basic training graduation? My mom wants to purchase a new camcorder to use at my basic training graduation for the Air Force. I am ashamed to admit, I dont know a thing about camcorders. I did some researched and talked to a few people who recently purchased a camcorder and I'm still very fuzzy. Does anyone have any suggestions? Specific brand and model? Maybe, a general rule of thumb or ruleS of thumb for purchasing a GOOD quality camcorder.
_____________________
yahoo keyword tool ~ overture ~ traffic estimator ~ adwords traffic estimator


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:19 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38597
bethaniax wrote:
What is the best camcorder to record a basic training graduation? My mom wants to purchase a new camcorder to use at my basic training graduation for the Air Force. I am ashamed to admit, I dont know a thing about camcorders. I did some researched and talked to a few people who recently purchased a camcorder and I'm still very fuzzy. Does anyone have any suggestions? Specific brand and model? Maybe, a general rule of thumb or ruleS of thumb for purchasing a GOOD quality camcorder.

Welcome, newbie! There are a few ways you can go with camcorders at the mo. Old schoolers like Chinny will insist that Mini-DV tapes are still the way to go, but for a casual user, something in the removable storage range might be more your style. Look for the SD card range. My brother has a JVC that does TV quality vids straight onto an SD card and it's unbelievably simple to use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:22 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Are you in the US of America, bethaniax?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:31 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
The Canon Vixia range (as they are called in the USA). Preferably the higher end ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:54 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
chinnyhill10 wrote:
The Canon Vixia range (as they are called in the USA). Preferably the higher end ones.


:this:

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 16:31 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
The Canon Vixia range (as they are called in the USA). Preferably the higher end ones.


:this:


I'll probably get one as a third camera for next year. I find myself in situations sometimes where I wonder what the fuck I'm doing placing 5 grands worth of camera in the line of fire when I could have a cheapie in the side pocket of the camera bag for those one off shots. The people on the pro forums I frequent have use the high end Vixia (they are called something else in the UK) alongside their EX1's with pleasing results. Still looks like camcorder footage natch but if you stick a wide angle adaptor on them you can get away with fleeting wide shots etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 21:25 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
chinnyhill10 wrote:
parm wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
The Canon Vixia range (as they are called in the USA). Preferably the higher end ones.


:this:


I'll probably get one as a third camera for next year. I find myself in situations sometimes where I wonder what the fuck I'm doing placing 5 grands worth of camera in the line of fire when I could have a cheapie in the side pocket of the camera bag for those one off shots. The people on the pro forums I frequent have use the high end Vixia (they are called something else in the UK) alongside their EX1's with pleasing results. Still looks like camcorder footage natch but if you stick a wide angle adaptor on them you can get away with fleeting wide shots etc.


Legria in the UK. As I said earlier, I've got an HF-20. It wasn't cheap for a consumer camcorder, but with a monopod, and a bit of time in the edit, it's really quite remarkably good (although low-light performance is poor - but that's not really a problem most of the time). The HFC range is even more impressive.

I've been vaguely pondering a wide-adapter for a while - I love wide-angle in my still photos - but getting hold of things like that can be difficult and expensive; any recommendations for where to pick one up from?

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 22:18 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:
I've been vaguely pondering a wide-adapter for a while - I love wide-angle in my still photos - but getting hold of things like that can be difficult and expensive; any recommendations for where to pick one up from?


Ignore the shit website, Hague are great:

http://www.b-hague.co.uk/camera%20supports%20systems.htm

They have lots of great stuff such as jib arms etc. But they do sell wide angle adaptors. Although keep in mind sticking a wide angle on a domestic camcorder still won't be as wide as the stock lens on a bigger camera.

A wide angle for my EX1 is 400 quid. Ouch!

Remember that most wide angle adaptor will only allow a partial zoom at best.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 22:24 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Yes, but what about for basic training graduation?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 23:01 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
kalmar wrote:
Yes, but what about for basic training graduation?


This:

http://www.creativevideo.co.uk/public/view_item_cat.php?catalogue_number=sony_srw-9000

NB: You may need a lens as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 23:31 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 29th Sep, 2009
Posts: 282
Location: In the corner, sobbing gently
chinnyhill10 wrote:
parm wrote:
I've been vaguely pondering a wide-adapter for a while - I love wide-angle in my still photos - but getting hold of things like that can be difficult and expensive; any recommendations for where to pick one up from?


Ignore the shit website, Hague are great:

http://www.b-hague.co.uk/camera%20supports%20systems.htm

They have lots of great stuff such as jib arms etc. But they do sell wide angle adaptors. Although keep in mind sticking a wide angle on a domestic camcorder still won't be as wide as the stock lens on a bigger camera.


Damn you, I'm now looking at Steadicams. You're going to cost me money, you are.

_________________
Back when I was young, we had to travel back in time to put the tape in so the game would load before we died.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Digital Camcorders RMD
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 23:52 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
parm wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
parm wrote:
I've been vaguely pondering a wide-adapter for a while - I love wide-angle in my still photos - but getting hold of things like that can be difficult and expensive; any recommendations for where to pick one up from?


Ignore the shit website, Hague are great:

http://www.b-hague.co.uk/camera%20supports%20systems.htm

They have lots of great stuff such as jib arms etc. But they do sell wide angle adaptors. Although keep in mind sticking a wide angle on a domestic camcorder still won't be as wide as the stock lens on a bigger camera.


Damn you, I'm now looking at Steadicams. You're going to cost me money, you are.


Get a Fig Rig. It's the best way to get any small camera to look like something far heavier on screen.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo, The Greys and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.