End of an Era wrote:
kalmar wrote:
End of an Era wrote:
Of more concern at the moment is another stupid idea they have of putting RFID chips in bins and weighing them on collection - I've bought several rare-earth magnets to take care of the chips and will offer my RFID elimination services to the neighbourhood as and when it comes into force.
That won't work.
Really? RE magnets fuck-up most electronics do-hickeys good and proper. I'll have to have a play - and maybe come up with some other means of disabling them.
No, a rare earth [strong] magnet might damage something which is sensitive to magnetism such as a hard disk, CRT monitor or old-fashioned credit card. It doesn't do anything to electronics in general.
kalmar wrote:
Is it harmless though, or is it the thin end of the wedge? I'm all for saving the planet, cutting emissions and reducing waste, but I don't think any of these "strategies" are designed to do any of that, but are designed to erode our civil liberties and provide a new source of tax revenue.
No, it's got sod-all to do with civil liberties! Seriously, if that's what you're worried about there's loads of things massively further up the wedge already - complain about those, please!
Quote:
Can you imagine what will happen if and when they start charging you on the weight of your bin? You'll get people putting stuff in their neighbour's bins so that they don't incur the penalty! There'll be hordes of furtive bin-fillers operating by night, transferring rubbish from one bin to another! And to counter this there'll be a growth in Night-bin-watchmen! It'll all descend into chaos!
Levity aside, if we really want a reduction in waste we'll need a national strategy, not these half-arsed localised wallet emptiers. And that national strategy needs to target the cause of all the waste - the supermarkets and producers who over-package food.
As you've just demonstrated, charging the consumer
is a pretty effective motivator. And you don't
have to buy stuff that's overpackaged.
And I think you've overlooked another angle. Paying by weight is fairer. I *wish* we got charged by weight, because there's almost always a trivial amount of stuff, like one or two carrier bags worth of packaging in our wheelie bin when it's collected fortnightly. You probably couldn't even weigh it! And yet, we pay full whack on the council tax for bin collection, which is a lot, so we're effectively subsidising all the lazy bastards who don't recycle a thing, and all the families with hordes of offspring that produce their own weight in rubbish every waking hour.
So it would reduce waste (most people will think about it more and recycle more), and at least you'll pay in proportion to what you use, like virtually every other service in the modern world. A great idea IMHO.
Quote:
(I have also written extensively to the Government, my MP and just about anyone else who'll listen (or at least has a postal address
) on the DNA database, Government IT projects in general, biometric passports and a whole host of other issues. Not that it'll make much difference, but at least they'll have a good reason to send the black helicopters after me
)
And fair play to you sir!