Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 18:13 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
I finally bought a desk clamp for my secondary monitor on my PC. This means I can rotate it. It's 22", so rotated it runs at 1050 (which is enough width for most web pages) by 1680 (which is a hell of a lot of pixels).

Here's the front page of Beex in a full-screen Firefox window:
Attachment:
the_web_at_1080x1650.png

Look at how much you can read at a glance! I could get very used to this.

The only problem is the fonts look rough -- the antialiasing isn't very good on this cheap Benq panel -- Windows will have the subpixel ordering wrong. I have a better quality Viewsonic, so I'll probably swap that out.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 19:14 
User avatar
Master of dodgy spelling....

Joined: 25th Sep, 2008
Posts: 22616
Location: shropshire, uk
looks cool doc

_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 19:24 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I tried that with my monitor at work. Couldn't get on with it at all for some reason.
Could be good for playing certain arcade games though..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 19:29 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
go play dodonpachi dude


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 19:58 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Looks cool, but I can't use full-screen applications for reading so it'd be no use for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 20:04 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
A colleague of mine has this set-up at work... The cunt. He doesn't even spend all of his time on here like I do. Uses it for "coding".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:11 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
I remember they used to do rotating monitors (a Mac place had 'em) for people who did desktop publishing. For normal work, you'd have it at the normal horizontal aspect, or you could twist it vertically so you could fit an entire page of A4 on at once. Very cool.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:21 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Ah, wasn't there a specific Commodore monitor for DTP work, it was purely in portrait mode IIRC. Perhaps the same thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:36 
User avatar
Honey Boo Boo

Joined: 28th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12328
Location: Tronna, Canandada
A friend had a neat mouse and matching pad. The pad represented the screen, and if you picked up the mouse, and placed it down elsewhere on the pad the cursor would jump to where you'd put it. I think it was intended for artists or CAD users, in that you could put a schematic on the pad and then accurately reproduce it on the screen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:03 
User avatar
SavyGamer

Joined: 29th Apr, 2008
Posts: 7600
I have a rotating monitor, excellent for Ikaruga on the 360.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:13 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
my stupid samsung t220 doesn't rotate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:56 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11773
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
Good old Nvrotate.

I did it once, but had to turn my head sideways :D

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 16:58 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1982
I really need to have a go with that app that lets you maximise to either the left or right half of the screen, as my vertical resolution is already 1600 (which does indeed reduce a lot of the need for vertical scrolling). Actually I'm sure I remember reading Windows 7 has something along those lines built in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 21:10 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
Nik wrote:
Actually I'm sure I remember reading Windows 7 has something along those lines built in.
It does. Win+left arrow and WIn+right arrow maximise the window to half the screen, on the appropriate side. That's a nifty feature.

RuySan wrote:
my stupid samsung t220 doesn't rotate
I share your pain! My T260HD (that's next to that rotated 22") doesn't have VESA mounts, for some unfathomable stupid reason. I wanted to get a two-monitor mounting arm so I could free up some desk space but sadly I cannot.

MetalAngel wrote:
A friend had a neat mouse and matching pad. The pad represented the screen, and if you picked up the mouse, and placed it down elsewhere on the pad the cursor would jump to where you'd put it. I think it was intended for artists or CAD users, in that you could put a schematic on the pad and then accurately reproduce it on the screen.
I used one of those, and I owned one too at one point. They worked a bit like laptop glidepads do, a copper grid in the pad that sensed the position of a small magnet in the mouse. They were really weird to use as a mouse.

MetalAngel wrote:
I remember they used to do rotating monitors (a Mac place had 'em) for people who did desktop publishing. For normal work, you'd have it at the normal horizontal aspect, or you could twist it vertically so you could fit an entire page of A4 on at once. Very cool.
Yeah, you get some monitors that sense you tilting them, tell the PC what has happened, and then a special driver kicked in and auto-rotated the screen.

Malabar Front wrote:
Looks cool, but I can't use full-screen applications for reading so it'd be no use for me.
Why so?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 21:23 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
Malabar Front wrote:
Looks cool, but I can't use full-screen applications for reading so it'd be no use for me.
Why so?


It feels weird and I don't like moving my eyes too much. I'd prefer to scroll than look up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The web at 1050x1680
PostPosted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 21:27 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
Malabar Front wrote:
It feels weird and I don't like moving my eyes too much. I'd prefer to scroll than look up.
Ah, I see. It's fantastic for opening API reference docs on the second monitor when I am working on the main one, because I can flick my eyes up and down it whilst keeping mouse focus on whatever I am working on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo, Kern, TheVision and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.