Be Excellent To Each Other

I don't doubt that The Right Snorable Mr Dave can confirm, but I'm fairly sure that apart from my Great Great Uncle Mr "Mad Hatchet Slasher" Chris, all of my ancestors have been paragons of virtue, if also examples of Darwinism in action.

T'is true.

Sounds like time to rebel, eh?

Rabble rabble rabble.

No no, I'm far too much of a conformist for that. Plus the whips won't let me.

Politics is all about political bandwagoning right ?

[vote:Runcle]

:-)

/deadpool mode on

And the real problem here is that people who look dodgy and that you wouldn't trust at all , are just playing the part because thats exactly how you'd expect politicians to act

/deadpool mode off

Some of us have got serious sleeping, um I mean research to do...

Got to keep informed ahead of the vote you know.

Malc

Seems like people are getting on my back. Being the only one that can hold the coin toss Im tempted to perform it soon to avoid this increasing suspicion on me. Although with the dwindling popularity of the party at this present time I think it would be foolish if the coin toss was to go ahead at this current time and should be delayed until the last possible moment so we can win back our public.

My current suspicion is with Mr Dave with his ridiculous suggestion of abolishing frog slave labour, a ludicrous suggestion in this current economic climate. If we got rid of the frog slaves who would clean all our school swimming pools, which would lead to disgruntled parents with lacking physical education, we'll be accused of making the children fat again by Jamie fucking Oliver.

I've also noticed the anagram name of Mr Daves 'mysterious' emails.

Mr. D, Rill? Look Famaliar.

Yes its Mr Rim Dill, the leader of the Badger/Skunk Hybrid party, well known for his animal loving policies, like better plumbing for Sewer Rats and better air ventilation for the Gorillas in the Mist. I think Mr Dave might be our Rebel in our midst.

[vote:mr dave]

I object to Mr Daves assessment that I have done nothing. I have come up with a witty bon mot, plus my diligent support for the Party may not have manifested itself today, but the Leader can be assured that I spoke up in his favour at a meeting of the constiuentcy party (at the Dog and Duck, Furtlebury), at my weekly surgery (the Railwaymans Arms, Upper Nethers) and at my recent public meeting (the Tap and Stile, East Rimming).

Well, Mr Dave did say the media were unimaginative..

Well it is festival season, I guess.

Man, that's what the confederates said about slave labour. And then what did they do? Aye, they rebelled.

Would a supporter of Rim Dill support deep fried squirrel on a stick? No, they would not.

For the record, I voted for Runcle because it was funny to do so in context.

But I've got nothing else to go on, so I didn't unvote. It's all random today.

I've not seen so much flip-flopping since the Rt Hon Gordon Brown reneged on the 10% tax band while snorkelling in the Caribbean.

[vote:zaphod79]

[vote: Mr Dave]

Well.. from what I recall through a brandy glazed fog:

Runcle had some coins. We can all agree that he did.

Now he claims he doesn't, or wont show them, something about national security and not being in the public interest.

I strongly believe in the story I made up and subsequently leaked to the papers, that he in fact has given the coins to illegal immigrant badger botherers so that they can come over here and disrupt workers at the Burberry hat factory from going about their normal business, all so the French can keep their farming subsidies.

Its a disgrace, and I demand a pubic enquiry!

At this current stage of events, I cannot bring myself to vote for someone getting into the swing of things. As such, my vote will go towards one of the quieter ones.

[vote:Malc]

Why?
Why?

Why?
Because of what he said.

Because one of his earlier responses to me was blatently shit-stirring, in a back-bench rebel or muck-raker stylee.

For a day 1 lynching, it's good logic. Remove the person who's not going to give away any information as to their loyalties later.

Sorry, Sir Morté, you will have to wait another day

[vote: Malc]

VOTE UPDATE

zaphod79: 1 (Grim...)
curiosity: 1 (myp)
malc: 2 (Curiosity, Mr Dave)
mr dave: 3 (Morte, Runcle, Mr Chris)
runcle: 3 (The Rev Owen, Mr Dom, zaphod79)

Not voted: 5 (kalmar, joans, malc, superdupergill, plissken)

With 15 players alive, 8 votes are required for an expulsion, and 11 nolynch votes are required to not expel anybody.

I think Runcle should draw parallels with his beloved NUFC by being expelled from a well-known British institutionalised gravy train.

[vote:Runcle]

There are quieter than me, around, I have, and always will be a loyal member of the party faithful. I am Frabjous Anarchist to the core, cut me, and I bleed Frabjous Anarchist, cut me in half and I have Frabjous Anarchist printed in the middle of me.


I have told you the reason for my quietness, and you will either have to accept that, or not. And besides there is a very LONG tradition of [MY FAMILY] being the party faithful (or at least their equivalents - disclaimer: past performance does not guarantee present or future status)

Malc

Thing is, Not saying much means we have no information as to where you fit into the scheme of things, and voting for said quiet people is essentially a lottery at any point in the process.

The first day is a lottery anyway, so in a way better to go for someone who that will always be true for.

Your comments so far have not said too much...





Although admittedly more than Joans

But on the first day, there really is nothing much to say or do anyway, and I agree with most of what you're saying, someone needs to be ejected on the first day, and it really doesn't matter whom that is.

I favour the set 2 people up to just under the limit and watch what happens when they squirm. That tactic needs time for the 2 people to be able to defend/incriminate themselves to work properly.

As there is no point in me arguing that I'm innocent, I'm more than happy to be one of the 2 people if that's what people want.

Malc

Cool. [vote:Malc]

I'm not happy to be evicted, just to be one of the people up, that DOES REQUIRE a 2nd person.

Malc

I guess at the moment that has to be either Mr Dave, or Runcle, and as Mr Dave voted for me [vote:Mr Dave]

Malc

I am disappointed that the coins are not, as it were, spread out on the table.

[vote:Runcle]

As I've said it would be foolish for the party for me to hold the coin toss because of our decreasing popularity, it really would be wise to hold off the coin toss, to say May 2010, so we can try and win back our supporters from the Badger/Skunk Hybrid Party.

What kind of evil genetic experiments are you conducting to produce Badger/Skunk hybrids?

I'd be tempted to vote for you if I weren't keen on hearing more of this scientific abomination!

Basically Runcle is dangling the carrot that he'll toss the coins if he survives the first day. Sounds like shenanigans to me.

Im not. Just trying to mirror whats going on in tha propa polytiks.

Keen to stop voting for Malc then?

I'm still voting for Malc, as the right honourable gentleman can surely see. Is this more propaganda from within the party, intent on destabilising it? I should have expected as much from a rebellious frog-emancipator such as you!

In a final bid to make people vote for someone else, will everyone stop barking up the wrong tree and stop voting for me you bunch of knobbers.

I thought that when I read it. So...

[vote: Mr Dave]

[vote:Mr Dave]

*pockets brown envelope*

Ah, a good bit of multiple voting, that's what I like to see. First past the post, pip pip!

VOTE UPDATE

zaphod79: 1 (Grim...)
malc: 3 (Curiosity, Mr Dave, myp)
runcle: 4 (The Rev Owen, Mr Dom, zaphod79, Plissken)
mr dave: 5 (Morte, Runcle, Mr Chris, Malc, kalmar)

Not voted: 2 (joans, superdupergill)

With 15 players alive, 8 votes are required

2 hours remain of this session.

Either Malc or particulary Joans fit the bill much betterer, and if rebellious, Runcle is much more likely to slip up and demonstrate that than either of the above. Due to speaking and such things. I don't see any point in dropping many Runcle lynching hints. As noted in my summary post, you do seem to have a thing for Runcle.

And why is it only the frogs people remember. I stand for other things too

I briefly threw disgusted glances at Runcle due to his reluctance to dish out the coins, this much is true, but you have to remember that I have been behind the move towards disposing of Malc.

He has, however, been more talkative of late, and as such I feel we might be better served by aiming out bandwagon towards arch-lurker Joans, who has done nothing but smoke his pipe indoors for the past day and a half!

Ah, go on, then.
[vote:Mr Dave]

I'd be willing.

I think you'll find that's 6 for Dave, actually, as I voted twice - once as a Rt Hon. Member Mr Chris and once as Lord Chris.

Why do we always vote out the interesting people on the first day?

Or alternatively, evertone could lynch the very opposite of the quietest person.

Congratulations, you bunch of utter morons.

Because people like the soft moratorium effect that games with no people willing to make it move has, it seems.