Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:22 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
What's wrong with wearing fur?

I've often thought that the reason people target women wearing fur is that it's a far safer option than going after motorcycles gangs.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:27 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
I hate to say it, but if I met you "in real life" Mali, I'd end up running you over with a threshing machine.

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:29 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Dimrill wrote:
I hate to say it, but if I met you "in real life" Mali, I'd end up running you over with a threshing machine.



Why?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:31 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
For fun, and also to enrich the soil to grow my soya beans.

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:32 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Did I ever tell you about that Fox Fur coat I almost bought for a girlfriend once?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 13:19 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69689
Location: Your Mum
MaliA wrote:
What's wrong with wearing fur?

At the risk of going horribly off-topic: :this:

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rhythm Paradise
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 13:48 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49237
Let's make it less off topic then, because it strikes me as interesting.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 13:57 
User avatar
Peculiar, yet lovely

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 7046
I think the standard argument is that killing something because you want to wear its skin is rubbish.

_________________
Lonely as a Mushroom Cloud


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 13:58 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
I think the main reason that wearing fur is seen as BAD is that fur is soft and nice and stuff, and the animals that used to have it are consdiered to be soft and nice and stuff. With big eyes.

Whereas, in reality, mink are vicious little fuckers and foxes are flea ridden vermin.

But i think fur looks nice.

Wearing fake fur is simply bollocks. it says "I can't afford real fur".

But fur is warm, and looks good.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 13:58 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17923
Location: Oxford
One line of argument might be that once basic needs such as food and clothing have been met it seems heartless to kill cute fluffy things for aesthetic pleasure. Eg if I was freezing n the mountains I could justifiably use fur to keep warm, but my needs in central Oxford can be met by other materials.

But then the same arguments might also apply to leather*

Me? I like those Roman soldiers who wore an entire wolf's head as a hat. That is cool.

* for shoes, you perverts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:01 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
There are several reason to wear fur in central Oxford.

it wil attract rich wimmins. Which is good, as they are rich. And wimmins

And hippies wimins, which is good, as they are slags.

Win all around, i'd say.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:01 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Men wear fur? Where?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:02 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16611
MaliA wrote:
I think the main reason that wearing fur is seen as BAD is that fur is soft and nice and stuff, and the animals that used to have it are consdiered to be soft and nice and stuff. With big eyes.

Whereas, in reality, mink are vicious little fuckers and foxes are flea ridden vermin.

But i think fur looks nice.

Wearing fake fur is simply bollocks. it says "I can't afford real fur"..

If it looks the same what difference does it make? Unless you don't like it because it looks especially nice but more because it is a signifier of wealth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:03 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
markg wrote:
MaliA wrote:
I think the main reason that wearing fur is seen as BAD is that fur is soft and nice and stuff, and the animals that used to have it are consdiered to be soft and nice and stuff. With big eyes.

Whereas, in reality, mink are vicious little fuckers and foxes are flea ridden vermin.

But i think fur looks nice.

Wearing fake fur is simply bollocks. it says "I can't afford real fur"..

If it looks the same what difference does it make? Unless you don't like it because it looks especially nice but more because it is a signifier of wealth.


beacuse, if you oppose real fur, and wear fake fur, then that's like opposing slavery but getting your butler to black up, innit?

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:05 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16611
MaliA wrote:
markg wrote:
MaliA wrote:
I think the main reason that wearing fur is seen as BAD is that fur is soft and nice and stuff, and the animals that used to have it are consdiered to be soft and nice and stuff. With big eyes.

Whereas, in reality, mink are vicious little fuckers and foxes are flea ridden vermin.

But i think fur looks nice.

Wearing fake fur is simply bollocks. it says "I can't afford real fur"..

If it looks the same what difference does it make? Unless you don't like it because it looks especially nice but more because it is a signifier of wealth.


beacuse, if you oppose real fur, and wear fake fur, then that's like opposing slavery but getting your butler to black up, innit?

I'd say it's more like eating veggie burgers if you're a vegetarian.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:05 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
sinister agent wrote:
I think the standard argument is that killing something because you want to wear its skin is rubbish.

Mink are ghastly little shits though.

So - if we ate the foxes, dogs, rabbits, mink and so on, then that's fine as the fur would be a by-product?

OT, I had zebra for lunch. Was nice, but nothing special.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:08 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Mr Chris wrote:
sinister agent wrote:
I think the standard argument is that killing something because you want to wear its skin is rubbish.

Mink are ghastly little shits though.

So - if we ate the foxes, dogs, rabbits, mink and so on, then that's fine as the fur would be a by-product?

OT, I had zebra for lunch. Was nice, but nothing special.


They only sell zebra so they don't have to stick a label on it to get through the till.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:10 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69689
Location: Your Mum
Kern wrote:
Eg if I was freezing n the mountains I could justifiably use fur to keep warm, but my needs in central Oxford can be met by other materials.

But then the same arguments might also apply to leather*

And beef.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:11 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).

If an animal dies of natural causes or other reasons, then fair enough, it doesn't need it any more. (for example, wolf populations in wildlife preserves have to be tightly controlled, so occasionally young males are culled. These pelts can be bought if you know where to look.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:12 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49237
Grim... wrote:
Kern wrote:
Eg if I was freezing n the mountains I could justifiably use fur to keep warm, but my needs in central Oxford can be met by other materials.

But then the same arguments might also apply to leather*

And beef.


Pretty sure that my need for beef can't be met by other means. I'm not going to a restaurant where a man brings round slabs of tofu on a sword and cuts off slices.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:12 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).


Is there any difference, morally, in breeding animals for food rather than for fur?

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:12 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69689
Location: Your Mum
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

No more unreasonable for breeding them for their meat, IMO.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:13 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Hi5!

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:14 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49237
Pundabaya wrote:
If an animal dies of natural causes or other reasons, then fair enough, it doesn't need it any more. (for example, wolf populations in wildlife preserves have to be tightly controlled, so occasionally young males are culled. These pelts can be bought if you know where to look.)


Most fur comes from pest animals though - with the possible exception of ermine. So you want them killed anyway, because they're overbreeding and threatening your crops/livestock.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Mr Chris wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).


Is there any difference, morally, in breeding animals for food rather than for fur?


None, whatsoever, in my opinion. It's a resource used for a purpose.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:14 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49296
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).

If an animal dies of natural causes or other reasons, then fair enough, it doesn't need it any more. (for example, wolf populations in wildlife preserves have to be tightly controlled, so occasionally young males are culled. These pelts can be bought if you know where to look.)


Sounds right to me. I don't think I'm camp enough to wear fur like MaliA though.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:14 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Zardoz wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).

If an animal dies of natural causes or other reasons, then fair enough, it doesn't need it any more. (for example, wolf populations in wildlife preserves have to be tightly controlled, so occasionally young males are culled. These pelts can be bought if you know where to look.)


Sounds right to me. I don't think I'm pimp enough to wear fur like MaliA though.


Fix.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:15 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17923
Location: Oxford
MaliA wrote:
None, whatsoever, in my opinion. It's a resource used for a purpose.


I agree. Of course, once the aliens conquer Earth I think I might quickly reconsider my position.

[EDIT typo]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:15 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49296
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
I'd like to eat a mink.

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:16 
User avatar

Joined: 12th Apr, 2008
Posts: 17923
Location: Oxford
Zardoz wrote:
I'd like to eat a mink.



Which wine do you serve it with? I guess Mr Chris took his zebra with a cheeky chardonnay.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:16 
User avatar
Rude Belittler

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5016
Grim... wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

No more unreasonable for breeding them for their meat, IMO.


Bog off, hippy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:17 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Kern wrote:
MaliA wrote:
None, whatsoever, in my opinion. It's a resource used for a purpose.


I agree. Of course, once the aliens conquer Earth I think I might quickly reconsider my position.

[EDIT typo]


Heh. but you've got all those Tom Jones cds...

I don't have a problem with veal production, either.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:17 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14323
Location: Shropshire, UK
There was a big fuss a year or so ago about the MoD using bearskins to make the hats for the Queen's Guards (or whatever they're called) to wear.

Everyone had a pop at them for it, despite their reassurances that they'd tried different options but none were as comfortable or as long-lasting as actual bear skins.

And of course, that the bearskins for the hats came from bears that were being culled anyway (by someone other than the MoD), whether they made hats out of them or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:18 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49237
There's no problem to have with British Rose veal.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:19 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69689
Location: Your Mum
Pundabaya wrote:
Grim... wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.

Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.

No more unreasonable for breeding them for their meat, IMO.

Bog off, hippy!

Don't get me wrong - I've got a leather jacket that took at least a cow and a half to make and I have no problem with steak or fur.
I can also merrily kill, skin, cook and eat most foods (I'm happy to do any, I just don't have the skill). Hippy I ain't ;)

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:20 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69689
Location: Your Mum
MaliA wrote:
Mr Chris wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.
Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.
If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).

Is there any difference, morally, in breeding animals for food rather than for fur?

None, whatsoever, in my opinion. It's a resource used for a purpose.

How far does that opinion go, though? Does it apply to bull-fighting?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:20 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16611
I'd have a hard time as a meat-eater drawing any moral distinction whatsoever between killing an animal for food or for fur or for both. At least not without being a massive hypocrite, and to be honest it is one of those areas where I am quite conflicted. If I acted truly in accordance with how I really view things when I sit down and think about them then I would probably be a vegetarian. I don't believe in what most people describe as a soul and I believe that animals are capable of experiencing suffering, pain and fear and that this means that they should be treated differently to just another "resource" as Mali puts it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:23 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
Grim... wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Mr Chris wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
In my view, it depends.
Breeding animals for their fur only is a bit unreasonable.
If an animal is bred to be eaten, then using their fur is better than letting it rot. (see also, leather).

Is there any difference, morally, in breeding animals for food rather than for fur?

None, whatsoever, in my opinion. It's a resource used for a purpose.

How far does that opinion go, though? Does it apply to bull-fighting?


I think I'd quite like to go to a bull fight. it's one of those things that I've never been to (although, in France many, many years ago, there was an option, but the MsA of that time said no, or something, can't remember why, might have had something to do with transport.)

I wouldn't have a conscionable problem with it.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:24 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 25880
Well, I suppose many people see it as a waste of an animal, more so than say a cow or sheep where people can eat the meat and use the skin/fur, which is I guess why more people get angered at the thought of fur coats than leather shoes.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:24 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
markg wrote:
I'd have a hard time as a meat-eater drawing any moral distinction whatsoever between killing an animal for food or for fur or for both. At least not without being a massive hypocrite, and to be honest it is one of those areas where I am quite conflicted. If I acted truly in accordance with how I really view things when I sit down and think about them then I would probably be a vegetarian. I don't believe in what most people describe as a soul and I believe that animals are capable of experiencing suffering, pain and fear and that this means that they should be treated differently to just another "resource" as Mali puts it.


That's why you hit them over the head, really, really fucking hard once.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:29 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55717
Location: California
markg wrote:
I'd have a hard time as a meat-eater drawing any moral distinction whatsoever between killing an animal for food or for fur or for both. At least not without being a massive hypocrite, and to be honest it is one of those areas where I am quite conflicted. If I acted truly in accordance with how I really view things when I sit down and think about them then I would probably be a vegetarian. I don't believe in what most people describe as a soul and I believe that animals are capable of experiencing suffering, pain and fear and that this means that they should be treated differently to just another "resource" as Mali puts it.

I feel the same way (I was a vegan for four years). I've come to terms with my hypocrisy now, though. Meat is too yummy to abstain from. I don't wear fur (I am not a pimp), but I don't eschew those who do. I guess it's a lifestyle choice.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:30 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 16611
MaliA wrote:
markg wrote:
I'd have a hard time as a meat-eater drawing any moral distinction whatsoever between killing an animal for food or for fur or for both. At least not without being a massive hypocrite, and to be honest it is one of those areas where I am quite conflicted. If I acted truly in accordance with how I really view things when I sit down and think about them then I would probably be a vegetarian. I don't believe in what most people describe as a soul and I believe that animals are capable of experiencing suffering, pain and fear and that this means that they should be treated differently to just another "resource" as Mali puts it.


That's why you hit them over the head, really, really fucking hard once.

Like in bull fighting you mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 14:31 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48825
Location: Cheshire
markg wrote:
MaliA wrote:
markg wrote:
I'd have a hard time as a meat-eater drawing any moral distinction whatsoever between killing an animal for food or for fur or for both. At least not without being a massive hypocrite, and to be honest it is one of those areas where I am quite conflicted. If I acted truly in accordance with how I really view things when I sit down and think about them then I would probably be a vegetarian. I don't believe in what most people describe as a soul and I believe that animals are capable of experiencing suffering, pain and fear and that this means that they should be treated differently to just another "resource" as Mali puts it.


That's why you hit them over the head, really, really fucking hard once.

Like in bull fighting you mean?


That's a sport.

Like Fox hunting.

it's different.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:08 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
I'm pretty sure when slaughtering the animals for fur, they tend to be treated very poorly and killed inhumanely. I could be wrong, however, and I agree that any meat-eaters against fur wearing can shut the fuck up. (Assuming I am wrong and the animals are killed humanely.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:29 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
Mimi wrote:
Well, I suppose many people see it as a waste of an animal, more so than say a cow or sheep where people can eat the meat and use the skin/fur, which is I guess why more people get angered at the thought of fur coats than leather shoes.


that's pretty obvious, but it seems maliA lacks common sense. Bikers use leather, therefore there's nothing wrong with it. What is wrong is breeding and killing animals for something as shallow as that. There's many alternatives to fox, chinchilla , and every other cute animal fur.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:31 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49237
Is there any good information on how much fur clothing is produced using captive bred animals, and how much is from wild-caught trapping and pest culling?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:42 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
RuySan wrote:
Mimi wrote:
Well, I suppose many people see it as a waste of an animal, more so than say a cow or sheep where people can eat the meat and use the skin/fur, which is I guess why more people get angered at the thought of fur coats than leather shoes.


that's pretty obvious, but it seems maliA lacks common sense. Bikers use leather, therefore there's nothing wrong with it. What is wrong is breeding and killing animals for something as shallow as that. There's many alternatives to fox, chinchilla , and every other cute animal fur.

There really isn't. Once you've gone chinchilla you can never go back.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:44 
User avatar
Hibernating Druid

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49296
Location: Standing on your mother's Porsche
Chinchilla

Is that the film where Alan Sugar stomps around Tokyo?

_________________
SD&DG Illustrated! Behance Bleep Bloop

'Not without talent but dragged down by bass turgidity'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:44 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
i want everyone who wants this cute mix between a squirrel and an hamster dead, dead.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fur is(n't) murder
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 15:46 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 3137
I watched a peta video on chinese fur trade. I defy anyone to promote wearing of fur after deeing a kinda racoon dog skinned alive and bliking its bloody eyes ina pile of its other dead mates. Or indeed the dogs getting skinned alive and tortured.

Craster wrote:
Pundabaya wrote:
If an animal dies of natural causes or other reasons, then fair enough, it doesn't need it any more. (for example, wolf populations in wildlife preserves have to be tightly controlled, so occasionally young males are culled. These pelts can be bought if you know where to look.)


Most fur comes from pest animals though - with the possible exception of ermine. So you want them killed anyway, because they're overbreeding and threatening your crops/livestock.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kern, Majestic-12 [Bot], zaphod79 and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.