Ok I havent gone to read the conversations that GJ is talking about yet and you are making me suspicious. I know that it is the nature of the...er....town?! to be suspicious and I know that we are all being a bit nutty because of it so maybe I am jumping at shadows but ONE person has said that maybe a conversation you had was a bit weird, and you are straight on the defence?
This
Mr Dave wrote:
Lynch me if you will, but there's no evidence to suggest I'm anything other than innocent.
is an overreaction. No one had suggested lynching you, GJ has even voted for someone else.
I don't want it to seem like i'm playing tit for tat and that I want to be suspicious of you because you are suspicious of me, but have you actually looked at my posts or are you just wanting me lynched?
On day 1, i was the one who said, let's not lynch MaliA. He got lynched. He was a goody. So by the end of day one I should have been one of the only people to be looking innocent.
On day 2, I first was a wee bit suspicious of Craster (which quite a lot of people were which lead to his role claim) which doesn't really show anything, since everyone was suspicious of everybody at that point. Then, I voiced uneasiness at the vote push for Runcle since the reasons behind sounded weak and the vote push the previous day had led to a bad lynch. My reasons for trying to get some debate on the matter were that we had planty of time and the reasons for voting Runcle sounded poor. As it turned out, the reasons for voting Runcle WERE poor and had nothing to do with his role, so it was really just bad luck on my part that he was an actual baddy.
I then said we should vote for someone who was being quite, since we wanted extra info relating to how the two iron men voted etc, and a few people agreed with me leading to a few votes for GJ who i had picked pretty much at random, slightly influenced by the voting for MaliA. I think that most of the people who joined me have since been proven to be goodies, so it wasnt a bad guy plot or anything. On page 11 i even say that my reasons are logic and THATS IT, i dont know who the baddies are im just trying to suss it out.
Day three was amazingly short and so i missed it.
Now, if i was a baddy, I would suspect that on day two, i would have sat back and watched what was happening letting people do what they want and keeping under the radar. I would not have decided, AT A TIME THEN RUNCLE WAS ABOUT TO GET LYNCHED, to draw attention to myself in the most obvious of ways by suggesting someone else for a lynch.
The fact that you are now being suspicious of me has made me reread the posts, and when runcle did his coins(i dont really know where they come from btw, have been meaning to ask, although by the context i guess what they do) you were rated as being middle of the road in both lists. We now know Runcle was a baddy. So maybe he was covering for you? Im going to go and read that conversation GJ is talking about then i'll be right back.