Be Excellent To Each Other

Fat Controller is a a paedophile. And in a holiday brochure. With Thomas the Tank Engine. Who looks, err, concerned.



HAHAHA, check the image filename as well.

Oh dear!

I always thought it was James who had the dodgy private life. Probably involving Annie and Clarabel 'rolling stock' as they call it.

So?

Comparisions to Orwell are bit clichéd these days, but it just sounds like the two-minute hate.

LOOK AT HIM! LOOK AT THE EVIL PEADO! THEY MUST BE ERADICATED!

What? So they think his photo will be able to abuse children, or something? Is there some hitherto unknown strain of magic-wielding paedos?

Indeed - I'm not aware that there's any provision of the sex offenders register that prevents you being photographed. Morons.

"mommy, that picture raped me"

"And disney will rape all of your childhood memories next, dear."

Plus, it's clearly telling kids that it's ok to be fat. Ban this sick filth (can we have a dimliee for that?)

I might email them, asking that, if you don't mind.

[email protected]

And the usual illiterates in charge - . Wanker.

I assume you're objecting to the use of the fashionable "in terms of".

I am. It is an aberration. "We discussed a recall" is neater, easier, shorter...

Interesting. So paedophiles aren't allowed to look at children, and we're not allowed to look at paedophiles.

So who's allowed to look at who?

I am allowed to look at pretty ladies.

Hang on, I'm married.

AND over 30....

Eh? I don't think anyone's talking about what is "allowed" are they? Just that it was probably a mistake to hire a known paedophile to promote a children's attraction. I don't think you have to be some knee-jerk Daily Mail reading fuckwit to acknowledge that. In the same way most people would probably think it odd if Pampers ran an ad campaign featuring Gary Glitter.

Only by two months.

Anyway - I think you should send the email, Mal. I may also do so, as Forest of Dean is just up the road from us, and I'm concerned that their paodographs could come and get my children, unless the paedographs are pupled as soon as possible.



I guess the difference is that Gary Glitter is fairly well known, and no one would have known any different about that photo if they hadn't said anything.

was exactly what I was about to say

I'll write one out in a bit. Gonna grab some lunch first though. Then I'll smite paedophiles.

I know, I wasn't being particularly serious. But I don't see the need to delete the photos; it's just a picture of a person. The photo isn't a person.

Yes, but the article seems to hint that he was fairly well known in the local area so it was a racing certainty that this would get out, therefore it was a mistake.

Hmm, yeah, maybe. But if it's a tourist board thing the locals aren't going to be looking at it anyway. They can't *afford* to go to tourist things, even near home. And they're too busy fucking the sheep, anyway.

This is giving fat bald men a bad rep.

In fairness, I think it's the fucking kids that started it off.

Don't worry, we still love you.

Sicko-FTFY.

FTFY

FTFTFY

The bloke sitting across from me at work right now sometimes works as a Fat Controller for Thomas The Tank Engine days. I don't want to offend him by asking his views.

I love the quote from these fools that 'the character of the Fat Controller is promoting the attraction, not the individual portraying him'. NO FUCKING KIDDING! It would be news if they'd gone down 'Forest of Dean Railway - as endorsed by convicted kiddy fiddlers'