Pundabaya wrote:
Boxing: More fixed than pro-wrestling.
average fighters fed no-hopers for years to give them an impressive win-loss line, then put in against a great boxer, in a massive hyped up bout, and are absolutely destroyed.
ComicalGnomes wrote:
See also: Naseem Hamed
Woah! Woah! Woah! Woah! WOAHHHHH!
Incorrect from Pundabaya.
The guy Khan lost to is not a great boxer. He's a decent fighter with little experience who is not ranked in the Top Ten by any boxing federation or list. He was literally a nobody... a decent nobody, but compared to Khan's level of exposure he was meant to be a good person for Amir to knock the f**k out.
Hah.
Khan has been ruthlessly exposed as being a very good flashy fighter with no chin at all. He's got potential world class offence, but can't protect his head for shit. He can feasibly learn defence, but he can't learn to not have a glass jaw. Trouble.
To address the second point, Hamed did indeed lose to the first GREAT boxer he faced, but look at the career of Barrera pre and post-Hamed. He was a world class boxer the whole time. He was considered the best in the weight category the entire time. Hamed was VERY GOOD. He took out the majority of the weight category in record time, won more than one World Title and was a very, very good boxer. Even though his chin was suspect, he was far better at evasion than Khan. Hamed won two (I think) World Titles. Khan didn't even win a British or European Title.
Had Hamed not fought Barrera, and had he fought a few 'mandatory' challengers, learned defence and schooled himself on boxing he could have been a legend. As it was, he hit a brick wall, lost confidence and that was it.
In summation, Hamed >>>>>>>>>>>> Khan.
And both >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harrison.