Thanks everyone for indulging my sweary tangent on this thread. (Do we need to maybe split this stuff out into a swearing thread?) It's an interesting discussion and lovely to be able to have it here, where we can do so without descending into just condemnation or (ironically) name-calling.
Mimi wrote:
I didn’t see your poll (because my Twitter client doesn’t show polls...) but regardless of how I feel about the word itself, I’d have voted no because I’d have read ‘offensive to all women’ to mean that all women would be offended by it. Clearly not all 100% of women would find it offensive, so I’d have voted ‘no’, but that doesn’t really cover my belief that a lot of women don’t like the word, especially when used by men, because it’s a word designated to the most intimate part of a woman’s body, so often abused forcefully by men in particular, now used as a violent word of disgust and hatred.
Ah, apologies for the ambiguity (something I find quite irritating in questions like this). I tried to avoid it by saying "insulting to all women" rather than "offensive to all women", but I probably should have said something more like "does it insult all women?". This may have skewed the results of the poll. By the way, for the sake of clarity, I was not in any way being remotely serious when I suggested that a poll of 19 self-selecting people on twitter was proof of anything whatsoever! I'd hoped that was obvious, but it may not have been (I am terrible at knowing when I've been clear or not - hence ambiguity in poll - possibly for reasons that need not detain us here).
I realise this is going to seem like a weak defence, but I use swear words quite separately from their literal meanings when using them "as" swear words (i.e. to express anger, irritation, disgust etc.). Consciously, at least, I would no more be intending to convey the meaning of a woman's genitals when using the c-word than I would (in conversation of a non-sexual nature) use the f-word to mean having sexual intercourse, "bugger" to refer to anal penetration or "bloody" (in its more common - to me, at least - usage) to imply bloodshed. I've also never bought into the "if you don't have one, you can't use the word" argument. At its simplest, I can't remember who it was (a comedian, I think - googling is drawing a blank for me) who said something like "I don't own an umbrella; does that mean I can't say the word?". Perhaps a better analogy is that it would be ridiculous to suggest women shouldn't use "cock" as an insult. If a woman were to call Piers Morgan (first handy example that came to mind, for some reason) a cock, would that imply a (possibly subconscious) dislike of penises, or latent misandry?
But (and this is why it's a weak defence) all that is to ignore the word in question's history. Even if it isn't being used to express misogyny, it's almost certainly (as Doc G says) gained its taboo place in modern English because of misogyny so, regardless of intention, it's not a huge leap for its usage to still be taken as such, particularly when the audience has not otherwise had a chance to form much of an opinion of the character of the speaker, in this regard. (I'd like to think one of the reasons Mimi is not offended by me using the word is that she knows I'm not a misogynist, but I may well be over-confident in this belief.) Words have histories and multiple meanings that can't always (and often shouldn't) be separated from current usage. It would be unthinkable to start using the n-word as an insult (regardless of ethnicity of the target) and claiming you're using it with a different meaning to that with which it's been used previously.
A lot of the suitability and acceptability of the use of swear-words comes down to the audience. It's a lot more forgivable for someone to launch into an expletive-ridden monologue when in the exclusive company of a group of friends you've known for years than it is to do so, for example, on a bus (tempting as it often is, but that's another discussion). It's easy to forget that forums like this (and, to some extent, Twitter) are publicly accessible and aren't just a bunch of mates (particularly as creating that illusion is probably this place’s biggest strength). While one may be free to use whatever words one wishes here (and, although seemingly to a lesser extent, given my recent bannings, on Twitter), those reading it, with varying degrees of acquaintance with the writer, are free to make their own inferences on the writer’s personality, based on the language used. This is something I’ve often failed to consider before posting tweets, replies on here, etc.
With that in mind (and because frankly the last thing I want to do in the world ever at all is to cause Mimi to feel stung), I’m going to try to tone down my swearing in public.