Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 358 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:29 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Zio wrote:
I got as far as reading the first post and seeing that the hotel mentioned is fully booked and gave up there. I don't have the time, patience or inclination to wade through it all to find out what's going on.


Why didn't you post and ask? That thread has been going for 6 months, I agree there's a bit much chatter due to excitement but do you really expect the most relevant data to be right there? (even though a lot of it is, on the first post).

Quote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes. Does that mean anyone here gets the injokes?


We're talking about things that develop day-to-day. Like Jonarob posting "hehe!" in that thread of lave's got several reactions that I didn't understand. Never mind, move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:30 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
JohnCoffey wrote:
I admit though that I didnt read all the posts.


:DD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:30 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
JohnCoffey wrote:

I pop in when I can and my first post of the day I say good morning/afternoon just being polite (too long in the USA).


Bits and Bobs is not some kind of live chat like IRC. It is for stuff not worthy of a thread of its own.

Eg if I walk down the street and see Dave Lee-Travis, I won't create a thread for that but will post it in Bits and Bobs. The idea of Bits and Bobs is to reduce forum noise, not increase it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:31 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
Zio wrote:
it's been nearly two years since we split with WoS. Isn't it time to maybe forget all that now?

Yep. But it's like asking and 80yo man to forget WW2, dude.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:32 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49002
Location: Cheshire
DavPaz wrote:
Zio wrote:
it's been nearly two years since we split with WoS. Isn't it time to maybe forget all that now?

Yep. But it's like asking and 80yo man to forget WW2, dude.


They would have been 15 when it ended.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:33 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
Zio wrote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes.


It's OK, I introduced a colour scheme for those people who find it difficult to cope. I hope to start charging for this shortly.

I mean, seriously, forums have had injokes since the dawn of time. Big deal. If you don't understand it, just move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:33 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
chinnyhill10 wrote:
The idea of Bits and Bobs is to reduce forum noise, not increase it.

Surely it does though.

Those that leak into other threads are fully self aware about. Now it's been highlighted, I'm sure (they -Ed) will moderate (their - Ed) behaviour. B&B shouldn't be chat, agreed, but I don't see the harm of a cheery hello at 7:30 being returned by a kindered spirit. Do you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:34 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
MaliA wrote:
DavPaz wrote:
Zio wrote:
it's been nearly two years since we split with WoS. Isn't it time to maybe forget all that now?

Yep. But it's like asking and 80yo man to forget WW2, dude.


They would have been 15 when it ended.

And therefore equipped with fully realised memories. Jeez :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:35 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
kalmar wrote:
JohnCoffey wrote:
I admit though that I didnt read all the posts.


:DD


Well I don't. Basically because I don't get half of them due to the in jokes that Zio mentioned. Most of them fly over my head but I did get the chemical fire one the other day.

Seriously, some of the posts here might aswell say

/hfhjk;l08947jfdjmkl;fdeml;./m,

fdu9489089jfdmn,.fdghjkf98989


Because they would make just as much sense to some one like me.

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:36 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
chinnyhill10 wrote:
Zio wrote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes.


It's OK, I introduced a colour scheme for those people who find it difficult to cope. I hope to start charging for this shortly.

I mean, seriously, forums have had injokes since the dawn of time. Big deal. If you don't understand it, just move on.


Fuck you charge all you want. We'll just use a different hue.

See I did get that one.

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:38 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Oi, that's mod colour >:(

John, that was an in-joke. You never read the posts before jumping in with your 2p :hug:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:38 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17161
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Zio wrote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes. Does that mean anyone here gets the injokes?

Many of them are based on in-game chat. Which usually means only the handful of people playing them will get it. (For instance, the querying about whether things are Dimrill. Which, unsurprisingly, was me asking whether something was Dimrill. In a game.)

Quote:
I think maybe we need tighter moderation on genuine informative threads

I think after certain events, they're quite cautious. Because some people (Mentioning no names, but gone) would throw a fit at the least sign of a moderator even thinking about doing anything. Certainly made me feel (a) sorry for them and (b) Glad I wasn't one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:39 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
DavPaz wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
The idea of Bits and Bobs is to reduce forum noise, not increase it.

Surely it does though.

Those that leak into other threads are fully self aware about. Now it's been highlighted, I'm sure (they -Ed) will moderate (their - Ed) behaviour. B&B shouldn't be chat, agreed, but I don't see the harm of a cheery hello at 7:30 being returned by a kindered spirit. Do you?


It's not IRC and it's not DS.

I can't tell you how much I hate it. Go and read any of the long running threads on DS where middle aged woman sit around all day and use the forum as a substitute for actually going outside. The kind of people who go shopping in their pyjamas. Hate it, hate it, hate it.

If that's the way people want this forum to go, then so be it, but if that day came I'd be off quicker than you can say "back in half hour, gonna watch Jeremy Kyle".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
Mr Dave wrote:
Glad I wasn't one.


[vote:Mr Dave]

I'm utterly bemused by the 'Dimrill is a Racist' one though. Including the frankly horrifying image that comes with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
kalmar wrote:
Oi, that's mod colour >:(

John, that was an in-joke. You never read the posts before jumping in with your 2p :hug:


Yes, I do dude. But for the most part this forum is 'be there or be utterly fucking confused'. It's almost a live chat room at times.

It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here. I only speak to one of you 'off forum'. I don't tweet or twitt or whatever it's called with any of you. I don't do the whole 360 thing and the last attempt I tried to speak with you guys face to face was just ridiculed so I just thought fuck it.

There aren't many people like me here who stick around on a daily basis. To some it would be daunting but to me I guess ignorance is bliss.

Seriously Kalmar, half of what you guys say to one another makes absolutely no sense to me. Especially when it becomes apparent that it's a convo over something said during a 360 play session.

If it wasn't for the fact that there are some familiar faces here and ones I've known for a decade I doubt I would have stuck around. Most of it just doesn't make any sense.

3 posts since I tried to post this... see?

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:44 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
chinnyhill10 wrote:
If that's the way people want this forum to go, then so be it, but if that day came I'd be off quicker than you can say "back in half hour, gonna watch Jeremy Kyle".

Fair do's. I'm glad we're being honest. Despite all my jibes at you, it would be a loss the forum if you left. (no, no hug)

In fact, it would be a loss if *anyone* left. Even Mr Chris.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:46 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
JohnCoffey wrote:
It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here.
Well, if that's how you see things, then fair enough; but your "post per day" count of 12.19 exceeds that of MetalAngel, Curio, Mimi, Mr Dave, Joans, etc etc. It's not far behind my own. You've made 1.4% of all the posts on Beex, ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
JohnCoffey wrote:
It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here. I only speak to one of you 'off forum'. I don't tweet or twitt or whatever it's called with any of you. I don't do the whole 360 thing and the last attempt I tried to speak with you guys face to face was just ridiculed so I just thought fuck it.


I don't know anyone here "off-forum", I refuse to go to meets, and the first time I spoke to anyone online was at Christmas and a handful of times since as I'm not a hardcore online gamer.

I have no issue at all with any of the jokes that arise from face to face meetings or the online gaming. I don't feel left out, there is no problem. Perhaps I've been around long enough to realise the limitations of forums?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:49 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Mr Dave wrote:
I think after certain events, they're quite cautious. Because some people (Mentioning no names, but gone) would throw a fit at the least sign of a moderator even thinking about doing anything. Certainly made me feel (a) sorry for them and (b) Glad I wasn't one.


Well, we are past that now and have been for some time. Like I say, if you think serious posts are being ruined by chatter, mention it, we'll try to help.

chinnyhill10 wrote:
If that's the way people want this forum to go, then so be it, but if that day came I'd be off quicker than you can say "back in half hour, gonna watch Jeremy Kyle".


The man makes a good point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:49 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
JohnCoffey wrote:
It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here.
Well, if that's how you see things, then fair enough; but your "post per day" count of 12.19 exceeds that of MetalAngel, Curio, Mimi, Mr Dave, Joans, etc etc. It's not far behind my own. You've made 1.4% of all the posts on Beex, ever.


I talk a lot of shit. LOL. That would be a joke but it's true. Most of it is about PCs and so on.

Let me give you an example of what I mean.

Gaywood would have told him...

Me to myself - What the fuck is a gaywood? a homosexual erection?

It took three months before I actually knew that someone's name was Gaywood. See also - the thread yesterday with the old paintings where people were laughing about them looking like someone here. I had no fucking idea what you were all talking about so I gave it a wide birth and posted about PCs or said good morning or something.

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:50 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69822
Location: Your Mum
I think we're discussing three different things now :S

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:51 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
kalmar wrote:
chinnyhill10 wrote:
If that's the way people want this forum to go, then so be it, but if that day came I'd be off quicker than you can say "back in half hour, gonna watch Jeremy Kyle".


The man makes a good point.


The really IRC-ey stuff is generally (most of the time) only in the BnB thread. It's one to avoid if you don't like that sort of thing (I personally don't have any problem with it, in its place, and certainly don't have the visceral hatred for it that some people seem to, on a par with their dislike of, say, people who like Simply Red*. Cultural Nazism!), and use other threads instead. One could always start a "Mr Chinny's Thread of 80s References", for instance.

If the whole forum was BnB, or going that way, I'd very much hate it.


*I do not like Simply Red.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:52 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
kalmar wrote:
Zio wrote:
I got as far as reading the first post and seeing that the hotel mentioned is fully booked and gave up there. I don't have the time, patience or inclination to wade through it all to find out what's going on.


Why didn't you post and ask? That thread has been going for 6 months, I agree there's a bit much chatter due to excitement but do you really expect the most relevant data to be right there? (even though a lot of it is, on the first post).

Quote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes. Does that mean anyone here gets the injokes?


We're talking about things that develop day-to-day. Like Jonarob posting "hehe!" in that thread of lave's got several reactions that I didn't understand. Never mind, move on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:52 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
Grim... wrote:
I think we're discussing three different things now :S

New thread?

(Jesus, Dave! Stop it!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:53 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
chinnyhill10 wrote:
JohnCoffey wrote:
It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here. I only speak to one of you 'off forum'. I don't tweet or twitt or whatever it's called with any of you. I don't do the whole 360 thing and the last attempt I tried to speak with you guys face to face was just ridiculed so I just thought fuck it.


I don't know anyone here "off-forum", I refuse to go to meets, and the first time I spoke to anyone online was at Christmas and a handful of times since as I'm not a hardcore online gamer.

I have no issue at all with any of the jokes that arise from face to face meetings or the online gaming. I don't feel left out, there is no problem. Perhaps I've been around long enough to realise the limitations of forums?


And you're one of the people whom I actually 'get' most of the time.

Strange but true.

But jokes aside yeah, I doubt I would go and meet with any one either. I just see it that I'm happy with what I have (life and friends) and I love spending time here. I would love to talk to everyone here via a live chat (voices) just to see what they all sounded like but I can't see myself going to Manchester to see the people here.

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:55 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
Sorry iPhone fucked the quote up...

I was saying 'hehe' because I noticed a forum member's real name on the petition. I don't know what the replies to my post meant either, but I'm not bothered. I'm definitely not in an in-joke, unless you count having a few beexers on facebook as an in-joke!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
JohnCoffey wrote:
I would love to talk to everyone here via a live chat (voices) just to see what they all sounded like


Damn. The only time ever that get a 360 might be even slightly relevant.

JC. It's ok that you feel like an outsider. So do I. I go on Live very rarely but the warm comforting bosom of Beex tolerates me anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:58 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
DavPaz wrote:
JohnCoffey wrote:
I would love to talk to everyone here via a live chat (voices) just to see what they all sounded like


Damn. The only time ever that get a 360 might be even slightly relevant.

JC. It's ok that you feel like an outsider. So do I. I go on Live very rarely but the warm comforting bosom of Beex tolerates me anyway.


Oh yeah dude. What I was saying was that I didn't mind :D

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:59 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Wogan'sTrouserBulge wrote:
Sorry iPhone fucked the quote up...

I was saying 'hehe' because I noticed a forum member's real name on the petition.


Oh, and that was their name you posted?

Quote:
I don't know what the replies to my post meant either, but I'm not bothered.


I now realise they were probably expressing displeasure that you posted someone's real name on the forum. If they haven't done it themselves, it might be a bit rude to go "outing" them like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:59 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17161
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
JohnCoffey wrote:
It's kind of hard to explain and if I did try you probably wouldn't get it, but I see myself as a semi outsider here. I only speak to one of you 'off forum'. I don't tweet or twitt or whatever it's called with any of you. I don't do the whole 360 thing and the last attempt I tried to speak with you guys face to face was just ridiculed so I just thought fuck it.

I meant to suggest trying to get a chatty PC game going, but thinking about how to go about it made my head hurt*. And the thread title didn't exactly endear me.

Quote:
Seriously Kalmar, half of what you guys say to one another makes absolutely no sense to me. Especially when it becomes apparent that it's a convo over something said during a 360 play session.

Bear in mind the community started before the 360 was even released, but (fairly slow) uptake of the 360 has made communications more immediate, and attracted a fair few members.

* - Voice comms. I'd have to insist, given that I'm used to t'xbox, something which can separate voice from game audio, like Ventrilo, and not like steam chat (Unless they've changed that in the new beta). Then choice of game (and consequent gnashing about control methods)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:00 
User avatar
Excellent Moose

Joined: 3rd Apr, 2008
Posts: 171
JohnCoffey wrote:
Yes, I do dude. But for the most part this forum is 'be there or be utterly fucking confused'. It's almost a live chat room at times.


I would agree with this, lots of very in-jokes and references, which makes it quite off-putting to anyone new, but then again it gives the place its 'charm' and 'character'

Reminds me of b3ta.com in terms of re-occurring obscure references etc...they don't seem to swamp that place either


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:02 
User avatar
Chinny chin chin

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 15695
kalmar wrote:
I now realise they were probably expressing displeasure that you posted someone's real name on the forum. If they haven't done it themselves, it might be a bit rude to go "outing" them like that.


Nobody should ever be outted on here. Isn't it in the forum rules?

If not, it should be. It's up to the individual users if they use their real name or not. Some might be posting from work for example.

[Sorry Grim.. off-topic]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:04 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
kalmar wrote:
Wogan'sTrouserBulge wrote:
Sorry iPhone fucked the quote up...

I was saying 'hehe' because I noticed a forum member's real name on the petition.


Oh, and that was their name you posted?

Quote:
I don't know what the replies to my post meant either, but I'm not bothered.


I now realise they were probably expressing displeasure that you posted someone's real name on the forum. If they haven't done it themselves, it might be a bit rude to go "outing" them like that.


Oh, whoops. Well if a mod would edit it that would be dandy. But, I didn't associate the name with a member and if I'm totally honest I can't even remember which member has that name. I just recognise it from facebook and know it's a beexer!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:05 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49252
I edited it last night :0)

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:06 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
The only solution here is a "rate this post" system, and people not getting positive scores should be limited to one post per day until they go back into the green.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:07 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Err yes, that is a rule. Apologies for not catching on, I didn't realise it was someone here's name at the time. Craster's edited it anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:07 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
D'oh! Cheers, and apologies to whoever's name that was, I didn't mean to annoy anyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:07 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17161
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
JohnCoffey wrote:
It took three months before I actually knew that someone's name was Gaywood. See also - the thread yesterday with the old paintings where people were laughing about them looking like someone here. I had no fucking idea what you were all talking about so I gave it a wide birth and posted about PCs or said good morning or something.

Mmm, if people change their username, as The Gaywood did (MS forced him to, as he's massively offensive), the old username will probably still be used. (See Jonarob: Or Terry Wogans Cock, as he seems to want to be known)

Similary, if someone has a name on Live, you'll often see that get used by those on Live, as it's a more familiar term. (See: Perkies)
Although many people either changed username when we moved from WoS (See: Me) to prevent such confusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:09 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
The only solution here is a "rate this post" system, and people not getting positive scores should be limited to one post per day until they go back into the green.


Open to abuse in heated arguments, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:09 
User avatar
Esoteric

Joined: 12th Dec, 2008
Posts: 11774
Location: On Mars as an anthropologist...
Don't go changing, to try and please me
You never let me down before
Don't imagine you're too familiar
And I don't see you anymore
I wouldn't leave you in times of trouble
We never could have come this far
I took the good times, I'll take the bad times
I'll take you just the way you are

Don't go trying some new fashion
Don't change the color of your hair
You always have my unspoken passion
Although I might not seem to care

I don't want clever conversation
I never want to work that hard
I just want someone that I can talk to
I want you just the way you are.

I need to know that you will always be
The same old someone that I knew
What will it take till you believe in me
The way that I believe in you.

I said I love you and that's forever
And this I promise from the heart
I could not love you any better
I love you just the way you are.

_________________
I reject your context and reality, and substitute my own.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:11 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Wogan'sTrouserBulge wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
The only solution here is a "rate this post" system, and people not getting positive scores should be limited to one post per day until they go back into the green.


Open to abuse in heated arguments, though.

Well, all's fair in love and war. Plus, the mods can add a balancing rating to even it out.

I see no flaw in this plan.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:14 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14497
I think we're all being a little self-analytical here because there hasn't been a fall out in a while. Like a relationship. Just chill out, it's only a forum innit!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:14 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69822
Location: Your Mum
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
The only solution here is a "rate this post" system, and people not getting positive scores should be limited to one post per day until they go back into the green.

Christ, that's a bit much, isn't it? (Although I suspect you're being sarcastic).
I think that would be a bad thing anyway, as people posted more funny to get more thumbs up.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:15 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Wogan'sTrouserBulge wrote:
I think we're all being a little self-analytical here because there hasn't been a fall out in a while. Like a relationship. Just chill out, it's only a forum innit!


:this:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:15 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69822
Location: Your Mum
Wogan'sTrouserBulge wrote:
Just chill out, it's only a forum innit!

:this:

If anyone is getting angry over this, then don't. This is a discussion.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:17 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 6183
Sometimes the spam annoys me, other times it amuses me. I'm no help am I :)

How and ever, it does bug me when someone's thread asking for help gets derailed/spammed to buggery before they get their problem solved. Same with the ones where we're in the middle of a great big fight debate & they suddenly veer wildly off-topic (that's possibly a self-defence mechanism though, as none of particularly want a proper argument with fallings out).
Zio wrote:
I'm also interested in how many of the top posters are here saying they don't get all the injokes. Does that mean anyone here gets the injokes?
I know what most of them are about, that doesn't mean I think they're all funny though.

_________________
"Wullie's [accent] is so thick he sounds like he's chewing on haggis stuffed with shortbread and heroin" - Dimrill
"TOO MANY FUCKING SWEARS!" - Mary Shitehouse


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:18 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14455
Location: Shropshire, UK
I don't mind the place as it is, I just ignore anything I don't want to read, spam included.

Although I did post in the Manc meet thread to say I might be able to make it, and nobody responded and I wasn't added to the "maybe" list in the first post. Either myp hates me and wants me to be killed with hammers, or my post got lost amongst the general chat and tomfoolery ;)

*cries*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:19 
User avatar
INFINITE POWAH

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 30498
Grim... wrote:
Mr Kissyfur wrote:
The only solution here is a "rate this post" system, and people not getting positive scores should be limited to one post per day until they go back into the green.

Christ, that's a bit much, isn't it? (Although I suspect you're being sarcastic).
I think that would be a bad thing anyway, as people posted more funny to get more thumbs up.


The thumbs up would be for interesting content, not funnies. That would be a rule.

I would say we need a sarcastic face dimlie, but I'm not sure what that would look like. David Baddiel?

Anyway, dunno. Maybe this thread will cause at least a temporary change in behaviours and that'll solve it for now. Until saturday and everyone starts posting "OOOOH I'm DRUNK".*


*Which means I'll be the first on.

_________________
http://www.thehomeofawesome.com/
Eagles soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:19 
User avatar
Ready for action

Joined: 9th Mar, 2009
Posts: 8551
Location: Top Secret Bunker
I think that in threads like the Manchester one it would be a good idea to put into place what was suggested at one point in the thread- since we are now getting close, create a sticky thread with the important details and if anyone has any specific information they would like to get they can ask it in there and it can then be added into the first post if deemed necessary. That thread shouldn't get too large since we only have a few days and any chatter about the event rather than specific detail reqests can be kept to the main rambling Manchester thread.
I would also suggest a new iPhone apps thread, moderated to only included recommendation for apps with a brief mention about what it is. I often miss out on talk about apps because there is talk about lots of other iPhone related stuff.

Also, just my thoughts on the reasons for this thread- I agree with most of them although i think that the creation of this thread is enough to reduce it. There are a lot of times that I see new posts have been made to a topic but I don't go and read it until there has been a chance for even more since I know that I will just skim a few of the inevitable nonsense posts. That's not to say that I don't like nonsense posts though-sometimes we get on topic ones which make me laugh (like one in the Argentina thread, I think it was Squirt? It was on topic but not serious and was excellent.)
then there are nonsense posts about recurring jokes and sometimes they are well done as well, like a proper use of 'i'm not paying x', but often when these jokes do pop up they are just filler and don't even raise a smile which ruins the great times the joke is made well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Signal to noise
PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 13:20 
User avatar
Unpossible!

Joined: 27th Jun, 2008
Posts: 38729
*looks for Arkham Asylum*

I don't think anyone's getting angry. It's healthy to voice an opinion on something that may be annoying you. The alternative is bottling and that eventually leads to massive DRAHMA.

Shall we bore my wife to tears with forum issues on saturday, or shall we trash it out now?

*takes off shirt and shoes. Oils chest*


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 358 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.