Captain Caveman wrote:
Sadly Mark, I fear you're right. Which makes me very angry to be honest.
Sorry to get heavy here, but historically the Working Classes (of which I consider myself a proud member thereof - I was working in a factory at 16 on £35/week) were much more highly educated and life-curious than they appear to be now. I'm afraid I put this down largely to dreadful education standards, as well as the media.
Time was, ordinary people used to take keen interests in pursuits like gardening/horticulture, cinema, music, sport, chess, writing, home electronics, cookery, literature and the arts to an extent; the membership of libraries and the like was commonplace. These days it's all TV dinners, Heat magazine and brain-dead shit on TV (soaps, reality TV).
I do have to agree with you to a great extent. My parents were both from very working class backgrounds, but their families pushed them into education and made sure they bettered themselves. My father ended up as an accountant and his brother a civil engineer, and they came from a family of un-skilled factory workers.
Grammar school was key to this, I think, as it gave them a good education and a desire to learn and improve. Dad got his management qualifications at night school once he started work because he was determined to do justice to his parents' efforts for him.
He then instilled the same sense in us. And he also transferred his love of hobbies to us, too. My brother and I wouldn't be so handy with the carpentry if it weren't for him, and I wouldn't be a big ol' Airfix and Hornby nerd either.
Admittedly it's all a very narrow anecdotal basis, but I don't hear very many stories like that any more. Then on the other hand I suppose I didn't hear the stories about all of my parents' contemporaries who were from shit families and who were too lazy to do much and ended up on the dole. As my brother in law keeps saying , the whole "golden age" thing is an absolute myth. *shrugs*