JohnCoffey wrote:
Kovacs Caprios wrote:
So you did not read it...
And you are posting twoddle, I read all of the articles that you posted in full. None of them had anythign to do with windows 7. So should I appologise for you not understanding what I am asking?
How can windows 7 beworse.
Nither has secrom andythign to do with microsoft, as a few people have told you.
Ok, here is another question, if you produced an OS how would you protect your investment?
Genuin and DRMS are used to protect theirs. Of course you are going to get hackers that open up OS. The same way people speed in cars. All you can do is try an protect your product.
Did you read my initial post that you summed up as twoddle?
See, I laid down my reasons for
1. Not like m$
2. Not wanting to use W7.
To which you replied "what aload of twoddle"
So if anyone hasnt been reading anything properly if or at all Kovacs it's you. At which point I found an article to back up every single last thing I said.
You were the one disagreeing with me, not the other way around. So therefore don't put me on the back foot with a single line of text and then ask me to read anything. I have now posted information (some if not all of which I believe to be completely true) which is all I feel I have to do. Not become embroiled in what you want me to do.
As for the Windows 7 thing. I believe it. Therefore, until I am proven wrong (can you prove that it doesnt lock DLLs and let software authors fiddle with my PC?) then leave it there. Prove me wrong. I have made my case, and posted links to it. You now go and find me an article that disproves the one I believe in.
Then I'll admit I'm talking twoddle.
Of all the things you have posted, only one article is about windows 7.
The rest had nothing to do with windows 7. GTA4 yes, lawsuits yes, secrom yes..... windows 7 no.
What I belive is twaddle is this :-
Quote:
DRM. Digital rights something. Basically it's like Securom. It goes into your hard drive and then monitors everything that you do.
So M$ are going to install a little virus into your computer that will then give them full control over it. They claim it is to rid piracy, but tbh it's not. It's for them to monitor what you are up to and watch what you buy in order to spam you with the 'right' advertising (something google toolbar and yahoo toolbar etc) do.
They attempted it with Vista, but, Vista runs without an internet connection. W7 will not. It's basically so they can constantly nose into what you are doing and when you are doing it. Also, if you thought Vista was like playschool watch out for W7. In Vista you can disable all of it's shitty and stupid hand holding bollocks. In W7 most of it is not an option. M$ see it as improving windows, personally I see it as an insult.
Things will not change. Just like games will have more and more 'protection' in them that will invade on people's rights and privacy. The only reason securom is legal is because of money.
Piracy will still exist, and games will always be hacked and cracked. It's the innocent that are being fucked over by it. It's very similar to the ID card debate. Note how we don't have ID cards? how it was passed off as an insult? So why does it happen in digital media?
Money. Record companies, film makers, game producers all sit in a category above the law because of money. They bully people like Bleem and others into submitting by hurling enormous ammounts of money into it and bullying them into submission. Of course they were doing nothing wrong, but that didn't matter.
It's all summed up very well by the episode "Chef Aid" of South Park. Some fat semi balding cunt yells "I AM ABOVE THE LAW" and gets away with it.
As time goes by software companies are becoming worse than the people who attack it. Why do you think M$ are the CONSTANT victims of viruses, attacks, trojans and so on? it isn't because windows is easy to code viruses for, it's because people hate Bill Gates and the windows 'team'.
Macs are one of the world's easiest systems to hack and write malicious code with. I've never had a virus on a mac.
There's also the big issue of the ongoing lawsuit in which m$ get to abuse the law. Basically (I can't remember the specifics now) they did something to windows XP that made it illegal. They were fined. When they worked out the cost of the fines it was actually a lot less than the money they were making. So they just continued paying the fines and raking in the cash.
With Windows 98 they broke the law completely. In Rev 1 you *could not* get on the net without signing up for msn dial up. They were taken to court, fought it, lost and then had to release a patch allowing people to configure their own dial up net.
So they're wankers, basically. Nothing they do is to make computing better, it's *all* done to make them richer.
Sure, it's a business, but when it becomes so apparent that they care fuck all for their end user that it's obvious people tend to become rather annoyed.
FFS they stole DOS in the first place. Hardly getting off to the best of starts IMO.
edit - Half of that is wrong... and by saying half I am being generous.. I have bolded the twoddle.. if that helps
_________________
MetalAngel wrote:
Kovacs: From 'unresponsive' to 'kebab' in 3.5 seconds