Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 15:44 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
No they would stay quiet , however i thought you were saying that everyone *after* Mr Russ who was asking to see the bit of paper would be 'good' , i think Mr Russ pretty much has marked himself out as a guest.

If he was a power role for the good side he probably wouldnt have asked for the paper , or wouldnt have announced it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 15:47 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
zaphod79 wrote:
No they would stay quiet , however i thought you were saying that everyone *after* Mr Russ who was asking to see the bit of paper would be 'good' , i think Mr Russ pretty much has marked himself out as a guest.

If he was a power role for the good side he probably wouldnt have asked for the paper , or wouldnt have announced it


No, just reacting to 401848234s frothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 16:37 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Aww, Poor Gilly. I'd be siding with her, at least.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 16:50 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Well, what a bloody surprise that was.

/sarcasm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 16:56 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Well, quite.

Still not sure why Craster was supposed to be so suspicious...

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 16:58 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Because he's always guilty, if he's not dead apparently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 17:03 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Mr Dave wrote:
Well, what a bloody surprise that was.

/sarcasm


Quite. Surely Grim... will get kicked out tomorrow?

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 17:45 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
It'll be interesting to see who goes tonight.

Mr Russ seems a good bet. Crashers may go for him and hope for another two hit like last night, giving a larger hiding pool, as well as some deprivation of information.
However, I don't see the Ex going for him, as he's surely not the bride.
And given that, the Crashers may choose someone else too.

If he does survive, expect much frothing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 18:13 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Pfah. People are being led around by the nose. Bad guys:

Grim...
Kalmar

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 19:21 
User avatar
Kinda Funny Lookin'

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3279
Location: Sheffield or Baku
Oh hello, this must be the morgue. Aye, so you say something then you must be a bad 'un or say nothing and you are a bad 'un. Do they never learn? To be honest on the first day I had forgotten we had started and then the second day I thought it wasn't starting until later that day (my fault rather than anyone elses) by which time I was chucked out.

Ho and indeed hum.

_________________
If work was so rewarding the rich would have bought it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 19:55 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Mr Dave wrote:
Aww, Poor Gilly. I'd be siding with her, at least.


As would I , its very rare for a "baddie" to get that enthusiastic about everything , the real problem they have now is what happens tomorrow.

If i was on the bad side and Grim... was not then wiping out Gill would be a good move because it points *lots* of fingers at him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:59 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Somewhat amazingly, every single win condition is still achievable.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:01 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Especially if they KILL GRIM... RIGHT NOW.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:04 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Crashers are still favourites.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:17 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
WHAT THE FUCK, GILL!?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:29 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Craster wrote:
WHAT THE FUCK, GILL!?


Genuine lolz at her second post.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:58 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Haha, brilliant.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:32 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
It is amusing, given Albino's rants in the last dead thread about how stupid the 'townies' were, that he's being as stupid as they were, but in this game.

:)

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:10 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Curiosity wrote:
It is amusing, given Albino's rants in the last dead thread about how stupid the 'townies' were, that he's being as stupid as they were, but in this game.

:)


He's either a bad guy, or has played an appalling game. From your comment, I'm guessing the later.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:34 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
I'm quite glad I got killed early on, this is pretty good fun from the sidelines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:37 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
See, our Gilly is lovely. (Also possibly a bored guest/ex)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 12:38 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Yeah, I just got told she wasn't a crasher. Not sure who invited the ex though.
I had no real idea who to go for so just went for a stab in the dark hoping to hit a crasher.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 13:57 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Its all gone mad now , does 21346326 really believe a best man claim is good ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:00 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
If I was the Groom, I'd roleclaim Best Man.

The Crashers really want to get rid of the Best Man, as he can expose them if they go for the Groom.

Of course, the downside is that they can get killed next round, and it would thusly ruin their win condition... but it'd be really funny.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:02 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Curiosity wrote:
If I was the Groom, I'd roleclaim Best Man.

The Crashers really want to get rid of the Best Man, as he can expose them if they go for the Groom.

Of course, the downside is that they can get killed next round, and it would thusly ruin their win condition... but it'd be really funny.


Thing is the couple have the hardest win condions of all , they need to have *all* the baddies gone and both make it to the end - although statistically possible its gotta be the most unlikely of outcomes at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:08 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
zaphod79 wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
If I was the Groom, I'd roleclaim Best Man.

The Crashers really want to get rid of the Best Man, as he can expose them if they go for the Groom.

Of course, the downside is that they can get killed next round, and it would thusly ruin their win condition... but it'd be really funny.


Thing is the couple have the hardest win condions of all , they need to have *all* the baddies gone and both make it to the end - although statistically possible its gotta be the most unlikely of outcomes at this point.


At this point it is staggeringly unlikely.

They should get a secondary win condition of just getting rid of the baddies, really.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:08 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Oh no! Roleclaim
Oh no! Counter Claim :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:14 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Brilliant. They're going to lynch the real photographer, then turn on the other one who'll probably be a guest anyway.
I love this game (although it's better when you're not on the side of the town :p )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:18 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
So, what do people reckon re: who the real photographer is?

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:19 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Madness , Grim...'s descriptions sound perfectly plausable , but so did SDG , she may have been thinking there is no photographer or we have a fight :-)

If i had to back one right now i'd go for SDG , and that one of her early pictures said Grim... is bad (but everyone knows my record on spotting baddies)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:21 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Well, I know that SDG was invited, but I guess that means she could still be the vengeful-ex or the reckless guest.
Her "I'm the photographer, but now I have to go" post buys her a bit of time to come up with a follow-up.
Grim...'s counter-claim was ridiculously swift though, you'd expect him to want to consider his options regardless of whether he's the real photographer, unless he'd been planning a role-claim. His descriptions are convincing, but not exactly useful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:25 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Joans wrote:
Well, I know that SDG was invited, but I guess that means she could still be the vengeful-ex or the reckless guest.
Her "I'm the photographer, but now I have to go" post buys her a bit of time to come up with a follow-up.
Grim...'s counter-claim was ridiculously swift though, you'd expect him to want to consider his options regardless of whether he's the real photographer, unless he'd been planning a role-claim. His descriptions are convincing, but not exactly useful.

]

If SDG was the vengefull ex then Grim...'s picture would have shown her poisoning someones food
She still could be the reckless guest but then your going to believe that she's found one of the crashers (despite everyone else not being able to)

Or of course she could be vanilla and trying it on - it seems to make more sense that she's the photographer because she was so passionate about getting rid of Grim... i think its her way of knowing something but not knowing how to communicate it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:26 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
If you were always the nominated killer, you'd put in place some kind of cover in case the photographer caught you. It would make sense.

Gill false claiming, not so much. It's a risk a bad guy would not have to take.

Let's wait to see what she actually has to say first.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:30 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
zaphod79 wrote:
Joans wrote:
Well, I know that SDG was invited, but I guess that means she could still be the vengeful-ex or the reckless guest.
Her "I'm the photographer, but now I have to go" post buys her a bit of time to come up with a follow-up.
Grim...'s counter-claim was ridiculously swift though, you'd expect him to want to consider his options regardless of whether he's the real photographer, unless he'd been planning a role-claim. His descriptions are convincing, but not exactly useful.

]

If SDG was the vengefull ex then Grim...'s picture would have shown her poisoning someones food
She still could be the reckless guest but then your going to believe that she's found one of the crashers (despite everyone else not being able to)

Or of course she could be vanilla and trying it on - it seems to make more sense that she's the photographer because she was so passionate about getting rid of Grim... i think its her way of knowing something but not knowing how to communicate it


Well, that would depend on whether or not Grim... was the real photographer. :S
Her descriptions are better too. Wonder who's lying? (probably Grim... ;) )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:30 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
And the PM's with Curio's sig in there ring true - is it possible the town may *not* have actually lost yet ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:34 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
zaphod79 wrote:
And the PM's with Curio's sig in there ring true - is it possible the town may *not* have actually lost yet ?


If she's faked them, then it's a nice touch. At least she didn't just post a screenshot of the bloody things. :'(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:36 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
and Kalmar as a confirmed 'good' person ignores SDG's request and votes straight away :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:38 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
As far as I'm concerned cutting and pasting PMs is fine, taking screenshots not fine.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:39 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Grim: "It's not exactly hard to fake something like that. Bear in mind that it took her seven minutes to copy and paste three "messages"."

Grim... fails basic arithmatic. Four messages. Add to that having to get to a computer, and typing the rest of the message. 7 minutes is reasonable.

And what's that you say? Not hard to fake a photographer role claim?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:47 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
The Rev Owen wrote:
As far as I'm concerned cutting and pasting PMs is fine, taking screenshots not fine.


:this:

It's typed, that's fine. It takes no technical skill to just write something out.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:47 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 8648
Next person to vote for themself in a huff, or because they're trying to evoke some sort of sympathetic reaction should be kicked out the game and banned from the next one (unless they can successfully argue it's not against their win condition).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:48 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49232
Doing it to evoke a sympathetic reaction wouldn't be against their win condition though.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:48 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
The Rev Owen wrote:
As far as I'm concerned cutting and pasting PMs is fine, taking screenshots not fine.


I agree , however I wouldnt have done it , and for this it really comes down to Curio's take on things , if he decides that bad enough he could remove her from the game but its his call.

The rules on this are slightly ambigous :

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1413

5) You may not use out-of-game information within the game. This includes, but may not be limited to:

* Quoting PMs from the game admin
* Posting screenshots of anything
* Commenting on user login times or other user behaviour observed using forum features

She cut n pasted rather than quoted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:48 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Well, If Grim... has been caught, killing himself off ASAP is rather in his interests.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:49 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
superdupergill wrote:
You enjoying this dead thread?? I bloody bet. Can't wait to come join you, no one is listening to me in here. :(


Yip - first excitement in the game in a while :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 14:54 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
My ruling was that it's dodgy ground, but Grim... effectively started it by doing a fake C&P, so turnaround is fair play.

I would have baulked at screenshots.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 15:01 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Ok, so overnight, Gill takes another picture.

Mr Dom/Grim... will be nominated killer, so if they hit the groom, poor luck for town given the info gained is useless.
So She may get the ex, possibly. Although I'd imagine the ex will be very quick to grab the photo when she dies.

It'll be interesting to see if anyone claims that photo publicly or not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 15:02 
8-Bit Champion
User avatar
Two heads are better than one

Joined: 16th Apr, 2008
Posts: 14497
Mr Dom wrote:
*NOM NOM NOM*
Waiter!
I'll have another glass of wine.. make that two please!
Oh, and any chance of a small sandwich, to go possibly?



Nice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 15:04 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27343
Location: Kidbrooke
Mr Dave wrote:
Ok, so overnight, Gill takes another picture.

Mr Dom/Grim... will be nominated killer, so if they hit the groom, poor luck for town given the info gained is useless.
So She may get the ex, possibly. Although I'd imagine the ex will be very quick to grab the photo when she dies.

It'll be interesting to see if anyone claims that photo publicly or not.


No, overnight Gill gets killed by the Crashers!

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Wedding Scum 'Dead' Thread
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 15:06 
User avatar
Paws for thought

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 17155
Location: Just Outside That London, England, Europe
Curiosity wrote:
Mr Dave wrote:
Ok, so overnight, Gill takes another picture.

Mr Dom/Grim... will be nominated killer, so if they hit the groom, poor luck for town given the info gained is useless.
So She may get the ex, possibly. Although I'd imagine the ex will be very quick to grab the photo when she dies.

It'll be interesting to see if anyone claims that photo publicly or not.


No, overnight Gill gets killed by the Crashers!


Yes, but surely photo comes before kill (Like Joans check of list on the first night did)
And there's some kind of precedent set for information to be left lying around after death ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.