Plissken wrote:
Malc wrote:
I'm getting very sus about plissken at the moment,
Mr Dom wrote:
Still no word from morte, who has been stunningly quiet.
Oh look, two under pressure, start throwing the names about to deflect attention.
I don't speak for morte, but what else am I meant to say?
This whole thing is about accusing people and seeing how they react, I think SDG is suspect (I mentioned this earlier today, and yesterday too) and I think you accusing Morte and I is suspect too. But then, I thought the same of Myp and Curiosity, it's very easy to jump at shadows. I also think, taking a step back, that my suspicion of you is reinforced by my obvious natural reaction of defending myself.
I've said before that I am happy to be put up for nomination, I said it on day 1, and I'll say it now. and (I'll expect people to compare this to what morte said) morte is right, The only real way for the party to get information is to kick people out, even if they turn out to be innocent, I am innocent, and if I get kicked out, pay very close attention to the people pushing for it.
The other thing of course is that if I don't get kicked out, and someone who I think is suspect is actually innocent, then that will also make me look bad, so it's almost preferable to get kicked out and be proven innocent, than it is, to be kept in and have more accusations levelled at me. Almost, but not quite.
Malc