Dudley wrote:
I predicted Joans being evil you'll note.
You also predicted me being evil in the abandoned first game. When I was Santa
Still you were nice about my rhyming attempts, so I'll let you off.
| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| ChristmasScum Chat Thread https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2705 |
Page 2 of 2 |
| Author: | Cras [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 13:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Yep, because that's who they are targeting. So yes, the investigators are very powerful - they are a doctor and a watcher, and because there are only one lot of bad guys, they can also identify a good guy at the same time. And they can of course block vote, though there aren't that many of them. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 13:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Cras Cringle wrote: Yep, because that's who they are targeting. So yes, the investigators are very powerful - they are a doctor and a watcher, and because there are only one lot of bad guys, they can also identify a good guy at the same time. And they can of course block vote, though there aren't that many of them. Though this is, of course, balanced by them being 'one use' types. The second one pipes up with info, they 'die' in the night, and cannot be protected. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 13:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Also, Kalmar sounds dodgy... |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 13:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Clausiosity wrote: Though this is, of course, balanced by them being 'one use' types. The second one pipes up with info, they 'die' in the night, and cannot be protected. More use than a standard power role - because they effectively have one 'free life'. The town effectively have a cop, a mason doctor, and a mason watcher, and one of the masons can be lost without losing either of the doctor/watcher roles. The only restriction is that the doctor and watcher roles are effectively forced into targeting the same person. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 14:37 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
So if this is a real roleclaim, is it of any real use? Or does it just stave off the goblins for one more day, at the cost of one of the investigators? |
|
| Author: | zaphod79 [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 14:55 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Cras Cringle wrote: So if this is a real roleclaim, is it of any real use? Or does it just stave off the goblins for one more day, at the cost of one of the investigators? If its a real roleclaim (which i believe) then you want to look back and see who has been protecting Joans from the start - he was almost strung up on day one until GJ came in and with a little help pulled it back. On the other hand as i posted above it can be a false claim - if you were one of the investigators and this happened then your given another freebie since you now claim and out the goblin who attacked last night unless that was malc in which case it all gets very confusing (actually that would be a great claim for the outed goblin this morning - they should have came straight on - claimed X was the baddie and said they were an investigator - with a bit of luck they could have had another 'kill' out of it) |
|
| Author: | Dudley [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 14:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
A lynched goodie today and one overnight could well be enough for the goblins to win the game... |
|
| Author: | Plissken [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 15:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Dudley wrote: A lynched goodie today and one overnight could well be enough for the goblins to win the game... Awesome tactics today would be to roleclaim as an investigator, point the finger at an innocent. Get them naughtified, have a free shot tonight, game over if you play the cards right. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 15:54 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Yeah, too late now though. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 16:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
And to think, I was the one leading the push away from Joans, as I knew he was in Germany watching Villa get stuffed and I thought he'd had enough misery in his life... the bastard goblin!!! I think Malc's roleclaim is sensible, but it depends on the amount of goblins, really. Malc 'dies' overnight, but they're down a goblin, and everyone else can sleep safely and start analysing who is on the good side. Comical is now a known good guy too, so can start throwing his weight around with impunity. Which could be amusing. |
|
| Author: | Plissken [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 16:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Clausiosity wrote: Comical is now a known good guy too, so can start throwing his weight around with impunity. Which could be amusing. CG - He just called you a fat bastard. That'll be fun when he gets to read the dead thread |
|
| Author: | Dudley [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 18:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
I predicted Joans being evil you'll note. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Santa has now got 4 pieces of information. Unless he/she has been very unlucky and chosen those who are on the naughty list, now might be a smart time to reveal, and ask for protection by the other investigator. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 12:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Clausiosity wrote: Santa has now got 4 pieces of information. Unless he/she has been very unlucky and chosen those who are on the naughty list, now might be a smart time to reveal, and ask for protection by the other investigator. Yep, now has to be the time, really. |
|
| Author: | Joans [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 13:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Dudley wrote: I predicted Joans being evil you'll note. You also predicted me being evil in the abandoned first game. When I was Santa Still you were nice about my rhyming attempts, so I'll let you off.
|
|
| Author: | Dudley [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 13:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
I was secretly predicting the reboot. |
|
| Author: | Malc [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 14:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Hi, I sacraficed myself as I wasn't really able to play too much. It would have been nice to have 2 bits of information to reveal, but at least the goblins had to off me, which hopefully protected some "more active" good boy/girl. Also, I think Santa has role claimed subtly. and I hope I wasn't cheating by posting as my daughter? Malc |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 15:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Spinglo All The Way! wrote: and I hope I wasn't cheating by posting as my daughter? Er - you did? You also ignored the posting restriction, but I'll let you off for extenuating circumstances 
|
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 15:21 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Cras Cringle wrote: Spinglo All The Way! wrote: and I hope I wasn't cheating by posting as my daughter? Er - you did? You also ignored the posting restriction, but I'll let you off for extenuating circumstances He pretended to post as his daughter to attempt to get around the '3rd person' thing, didn't he? |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 15:27 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Ha! So he did - I didn't even notice. Well that was in third person, so I reckon it counts :0) |
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Wed Dec 24, 2008 22:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
JBR says: "I'm convinced she's [Goddess Jasmine] good, see, hence going straight after Myoptinsel as soon as he went for her." Is JBR subtly roleclaiming as the second Super Junior Investigator, and knows that Myoptinsel tried to come for GJ in the night? |
|
| Author: | Dudley [ Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
I'm not sure but Shin and GJ are looking like some sort of group. Santa and the other investigator maybe if they're not evil. JBR does looks suss as all fuck too, protecting GJ. |
|
| Author: | Dudley [ Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:35 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
And now we find out. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Fri Dec 26, 2008 12:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
JBR would only know good/bad for sure if he was Santa. Ditto with Comical and his claim against Myp. I'm surprised there was a run on JBR. Looks like a goblin horde to me... |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Sat Dec 27, 2008 15:19 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
People are either stupid, or goblins. |
|
| Author: | Shin [ Sun Dec 28, 2008 20:20 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: ChristmasScum Chat Thread |
Dudley wrote: I'm not sure but Shin and GJ are looking like some sort of group. Santa and the other investigator maybe if they're not evil. JBR does looks suss as all fuck too, protecting GJ. We weren't a group  and I can't believe you guessed I was a badie in the first game
|
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|