Ok, so GazChap and MrChris are the ones who have been most quiet I think. They are on my backup list.
woooo oooo (thoughtful)

How about a bunch of us try to lynch Kissyfur then? Might get him talking...

It makes me even more suspicious that you haven't read 9 pages.

It makes me even more suspicious that you haven't read 9 pages.

Ghosts can't drink dude.

Aggressive, shame. I was just about to unvote, as well. It's obvious it touched a nerve and you've got something to hide. After all, ghosts don't have nerves as they're dead.

I am a ghost, so by killing me you are one step closer to a GB win

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Why all the aggression "Doc"?
As in, Dr Peter Venkman!!!

[vote:Curiosity]

Before everyone is finished voting, what are we going to find out from the person we are lynching? would it not be wise to vote for someone whos pointed their ghostly hand around.
Also I noticed Zaphod is being helpful again, with a massive post on page 6, didnt he do that last game and ended up dirty as hell?

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

Previous games are available in The Dead Zone, which surely us ghosts should have access to from the start anyway?

TBF, I don't really want to vote for you, but I'd rather you were possessed than me, as you might be on the side of teh ghosts, but I know I'm on the ghostly side.

Yes I get they are available, but why should they be reevent?

Heh.

And no, they're in 'Old Games'.

Strictly speaking, old games are "metadata" and so shouldn't be relevant, but people still refer to them anyway. Although usually in a "my cousin in another village" kind of way, rather than an explicit "didn't we do this in the last game?"

Bobbyaro, would you consider changing your vote to Curiosity?

I wouldn't say it was metadata at all. Its all part of the same game and it would be foolish to disregard how people acted in previous games.

Bobbyaro, would you consider changing your vote to Curiosity?

I agree, but when there are people who are new to the forum or the game (of which there are two in this case) it does seem slightly unfair.

Still, them's the breaks I guess.

Before everyone is finished voting, what are we going to find out from the person we are lynching? would it not be wise to vote for someone whos pointed their ghostly hand around.
Also I noticed Zaphod is being helpful again, with a massive post on page 6, didnt he do that last game and ended up dirty as hell?

I think you'll find if metadata is allowed that i've always been on the 'good' / 'town' side of any previous games

To be fair, that's like saying 'I've just rolled five sixes in a row, therefore my next roll will be a six.'

I don't really want to vote for Curiosity, but I'd rather do that than let the day time out.

I have not voted - we have 90 minutes left and need one more - i'm not sure about pushing curio - can we get a last 'why should we not vote for him' when he returns from his haunting of a resturant ?

I'm also looking sideways at Cpt_Droman who seems to have a very good grasp of what is going on which is unusual for a newb

*blush*

@ Mr Russ, yes, why?

Someone pointed out earlier, what does possessing Curiously Quite tell us. TBH, he is on my suss list, but I am not sure what it tells us. Mind you, first day and all that, short of possessing a GB, not much is ever going to be found out. :?

@ Mr Russ, yes, why?