Runcle's on eight votes so I'm going to [vote:Curiosity] just to see what happens if they go head to head. I'm still willing to change or remove my vote at this time, but lets face it, day one we know nothing anyway.

good tactic

Not when we have masons, it isn't.

Has their been a breach?

Why not company?

Not when we have masons, it isn't.

I see your point, but we all still have 4.4 hours to retract a vote and whoever we vote for (and it's only one) could be unlucky. We seem to be awful at even getting lucky with our vote on day one.

Yeah, I just mean that you put people under pressure to see if you get a reaction from people defending them. The disadvantage to us of having masons is that we have no idea whether someone being defended is part of a good team or a bad team.

Why not company?

I'm not sure from this that Runcle is bad, that's all. Coin-flipping is common in such tense situations, I believe

My response was curious? Runcle suggested we lynch me, so I suggested we lynch someone else, as I'm a DAC and lynching me wouldn't help us.

I can't imagine Runcle is going to put himself so clearly on the firing line if he's a baddie.

I can't imagine Runcle is going to put himself so clearly on the firing line if he's a baddie.

Technically I should be trying to survive as that is my win condition, but I also want the colony and marines to win so I really don't mind being lynched for that reason

If the self-sacrifice helps your team then it is playing to your win condition anyway.

Yet you believe that I will, by reacting to his post as I did? How peculiar.

And it wasn't an overreaction to see myself as the only person on 5 'Heads' and say we should go for the person on 0, it was common sense. The first day is a crapshoot, and had I not said anything I might have already been sent outside.

Yet you believe that I will, by reacting to his post as I did? How peculiar.

And it wasn't an overreaction to see myself as the only person on 5 'Heads' and say we should go for the person on 0, it was common sense. The first day is a crapshoot, and had I not said anything I might have already been sent outside.

And I don't want to go outside. It's cold and I've forgotten my gloves.

Well, it was, as this isn't your first game, so you should know that very few people will vote on the basis of the coins (See: how many people voted for Kalmar) To panic about them, and then vote on them was not a reaction I'd expect.

Actually I've found that a lot of people pay attention to the coins. Particularly on day one, presumably on a "nothing else to go on" basis. This is why I think they are dangerous, because people pay attention to them when Runcle could easily be a bad guy.

You can borrow mine if you like. medium size with a bit of string up the sleeves. i'm going to wait untill after 2ish before i decide, although i am leaning more toward one person.

How did he put himself in the firing line?

Yet you believe that I will, by reacting to his post as I did? How peculiar.

I heartily doubt you're a DAC, Mr Dave. If you were you might be more familiar with their win condition. I'm trying not to die.

So is anyone else going to stick some votes in, in the interest of levelling things out between the two contenders? I don't really want to see a decisive vote yet since we have a couple of hours but possibly if we could get it to neck and neck it might become more interesting.

Neck and neck at 8 votes makes it rather likely that any given bad guy team can tip the wrong person over the edge.

That's why I think we've got, out of Curio and Runcle, a good guy and a bad guy. There's too much interest in not just going ahead and lynching someone, considering it's day one.