DBSnappa wrote:
I suspect a lot of people are avoiding this topic as it's more complicated that it initially appears. IIRC standard def DVDs are actually encoded at a higher res than old skool PAL CRT TVs were capable of displaying,
They are encoded at 720x576i, which a half decent large CRT has no problem displaying. In fact in many ways a CRT is more suited to bog standard DVD output as they have no issues with interlaced material whereas even the best LCD or Plasma TV can make a hash of de-interlacing from time to time (because they have to de-interlace through design).
Of course because it is inherently an analogue display, the rough edges in the picture tend to get smoothed out. However a modern CRT set has no problem with 720x576i in the same way I have a nice Iiyama 19" monitor sitting outside my office that can do high resolutions. Bloody lovely picture but times have moved on.
LCD's and plasmas are designed to operate at one fixed resolution. They should have upscalers built in but the ones that come with the DVD players tend to be better.
All they do is upscale. They can't add detail. It's just a question of if it does a better job than the TV can.
BTW I have an upscaling VHS player with HDMI output at the office. So its not exclusively a DVD thing. They're rather essential if you want to send anything to a panel that isn't at its native resolution. Remember how bad old LCD monitors used to look if they were not at their native resolution? They didn't have upscalers built in. Your modern monitor should make a better job of it.
In short, you'd be hard pushed to find a Blu-Ray that doesn't upscale so don't panic.