Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:45 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
I can't believe it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gullible

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:02 
User avatar
Skillmeister

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27023
Location: Felelagedge Wedgebarge, The River Tib
Man that's an old joke I saw on QI that whatsherface thingy impression woman.... erm... her, told Stephen Fry and he fell for it and everything and stuff.

_________________
Washing Machine: Fine. Kettle: Needs De-scaling. Shower: Brand new. Boiler: Fine.
Archimedes Hotdog Rhubarb Niner Zero Niner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:03 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Nice try, doc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:05 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
God I'm so good it hurts.

Thats two of you....

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:07 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Dr Lave wrote:
God I'm so good it hurts.

Thats two of you....


I didn't click ;)

Edit: ah. Got!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:16 
User avatar
Excellent Excellente

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 426
I don't get it. Are we supposed to be gullible for clicking on it to check?

Because as far as I see Mr Lave is accurate in that there is no article on gullible/gullibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:24 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
This is the best thread I've ever made.

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:00 
User avatar
What-ho, chaps!

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2139
Better than your Oyster card dissolution thread?

_________________
[www.mrdictionary.net]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:28 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
Even Piers Anthony fell for it - Here is an extract from his Blog entry for Feb 2005 wrote:
I read the Ask Marilyn column in the Sunday paper each week. For a bright girl she pulls some boners. January 23, 2005, she featured a statement by a reader that the term “gullible” does not exist and is not in the dictionary. Marilyn said readers might also look up “gotcha.” Well, I did, and both words are in the OED--that's the Oxford English Dictionary, the global standard--and the big Random House Dictionary. I suppose this is like political conservatives, who prefer to believe that if a concept is not in their limited lexicon, it doesn't exist. Faith is of limited use when it comes to verifiable things, like the existence of words.


And here he is in his next blog (April 2005) after it was explained to him wrote:
Last time I remarked on the “Gullible” bit in an “Ask Marilyn” column. Several readers emailed me: didn't I realize it was a joke? No, I hadn't realized, and so I'll explain why. I made my fortune on humor; I fancy I know a bit about it. To me, something that depends on an untruth is not necessarily funny, just as with jokes that depend on a black man being embarrassed, a fat man slipping on a banana peel, the anatomy of a Jew, a homosexual person's love, or a woman being awkwardly exposed. Indeed, some don't find my frequent fond references to panties to be funny. (The rule is, panties aren't the best thing in life, just next to it.) I have the dictionary habit, and look up words daily, not depending on my fallible memory. I like to be clear-cut with words, as with Humpty Dumpty, except that I don't define their meanings so much as I verify them. I regard them as precision tools. A fellow writer once challenged me on “ploy”; he thought I had made it up. Then there's “bloviation,” which means loud, defiant, boastful talk, blowing, like that in this column; see if you can find that in your dictionary. (I know, I know: it is spelled T H A T.) And would you believe it really is true that there is no such word as “Mundania.” Not in Mundania, there isn't, except among fans. So I looked up gullible, to make absolutely sure, and verified that my memory was correct. So that makes me foolish? Let's extend the principle beyond the dictionary: “Your house is on fire--gotcha!” “Your child was just abducted and killed by a terrorist--gotcha.” “There are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq--gotcha.” “Social Security is in imminent peril--gotcha.” (Actually it's Medicare/aid in more immediate trouble.) Are we laughing yet? As it happened, a librarian queried Marilyn, also not seeing the humor. Marilyn said she herself had looked up the word, and, evidently discovering what it meant, laughed out loud and passed the joke along. But she won't do it any more. I suspect she got too much feedback like mine, and she's not stupid.


Full Entries for those blogs, plus all his back issues can be seen by following this link.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:29 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14375
Location: Shropshire, UK
The discussion page of that article is almost as good as the article itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:02 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
Piers Anthony must be delighted that Dan Brown came along. Because now he's only the second-worst writer on the planet.

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:04 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
Rodafowa wrote:
Piers Anthony must be delighted that Dan Brown came along. Because now he's only the second-worst writer on the planet.
You appeared to have stolen my opinions. Give them back and get some of your own. Lazy git.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:06 
User avatar
PC Gamer

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3084
Location: Watford
Maybe everyone's been right all along and I am, in fact, you.

_________________
XBox Live, Steam: Rodafowa, Wii code - 2196 4095 4660 7615
Blue Man Sings The Whites II - Judgmental Day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:07 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
You are correct, it doesn't. I did not know that.

Edit: Oh, I see, people have edited the wiki to remove the entry for Gullible. That is marginally funnier than the original 'joke' I suppose.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:18 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
Rodafowa wrote:
Piers Anthony must be delighted that Dan Brown came along. Because now he's only the second-worst writer on the planet.


I quite like his books (not so keen on the xanth stuff, but Incarnations of Immortality and Bio of a Space Tyrant are great series).

And I've been reading his bimonthly news letter for ages.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:19 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
Rodafowa wrote:
Maybe everyone's been right all along and I am, in fact, you.



Why are you talking to yourself?

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:44 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26100
But Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for gullible, so you've fooled no-one.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:45 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Mimi wrote:
But Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for gullible, so you've fooled no-one.

That's what I thought.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:46 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49244
Maybe he fooled the people who didn't click the link, thinking 'I'm no fool!'.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:49 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
And stay away from my bins.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:49 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
He's only fooling himself <shakes head sadly>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:19 
User avatar
I forgot about this - how vain

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5979
Craster wrote:
Maybe he fooled the people who didn't click the link, thinking 'I'm no fool!'.


Ding, ding ding!.

Sorry.I just think it's hilarious. I have a strange* sense of humour.


* and/or bad

_________________
Curiosity wrote:
The Rev Owen wrote:
Is there a way to summon lave?

Faith schools, scientologists and 2-D platform games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:27 
User avatar
Sleepyhead

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 27354
Location: Kidbrooke
In those blog entries, Piers Anthony comes across like a colossal dick.

_________________
We are young despite the years
We are concern
We are hope, despite the times


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:30 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
Curiosity wrote:
In those blog entries, Piers Anthony comes across like a colossal dick.


Or someone who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:31 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
Malc wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
In those blog entries, Piers Anthony comes across like a colossal dick.


Or someone who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome.


Does he suffer from that :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:37 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Malc wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
In those blog entries, Piers Anthony comes across like a colossal dick.


Or someone who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome.

Malc

Or both.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:48 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11168
Location: Devon
kalmar wrote:
Malc wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
In those blog entries, Piers Anthony comes across like a colossal dick.


Or someone who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome.


Does he suffer from that :?:



He has hinted heavily that he does.

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:56 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Bloody sperges.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:07 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
For those who haven't clicked Lave's link, the Wikipedia page genuinely doesn't exist. That's then joke. It's like Sideshow Bob stepping on rakes: the first two aren't funny, the third makes you smile, the fifth you start laughing, and (in my case at least) by the seventh you're strugging to breath.

Here, instead of rakes, we have layers of subterfuge. The old joke about gullible in the dictionary has been reversed, but so has your expectations, because of the old joke. So you don't click, because you know the article will be there; but in fact it really isn't. I think that's ace.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:09 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69721
Location: Your Mum
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
For those who haven't clicked Lave's link, the Wikipedia page genuinely doesn't exist. That's then joke. It's like Sideshow Bob stepping on rakes: the first two aren't funny, the third makes you smile, the fifth you start laughing, and (in my case at least) by the seventh you're strugging to breath.

Here, instead of rakes, we have layers of subterfuge. The old joke about gullible in the dictionary has been reversed, but so has your expectations, because of the old joke. So you don't click, because you know the article will be there; but in fact it really isn't. I think that's ace.

:titler:

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:10 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26100
I clicked, because I didn't expect to be there, because of what Lave had written, yet couldn't see why there would be something there, because it's a dictionary definition, which I didn't think Wikipedia presented as entries, so I looked to see what, if anything, it says.

Do I win?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:12 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 14375
Location: Shropshire, UK
Uh... Wikipedia blatantly does have an entry for gullibility. Otherwise you'd get a page similar to this: Gullible2

I thought the joke was that Wikipedia have left the page there as it is as a joke.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:13 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26100
GazChap wrote:
Uh... Wikipedia blatantly does have an entry for gullibility. Otherwise you'd get a page similar to this: Gullible2

I thought the joke was that Wikipedia have left the page there as it is as a joke.


I think there is a difference between a page/non page due to not being an actual word error and an actual 'entry'.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:16 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Grim... wrote:
Doctor Glyndwr wrote:
For those who haven't clicked Lave's link, the Wikipedia page genuinely doesn't exist. That's then joke. It's like Sideshow Bob stepping on rakes: the first two aren't funny, the third makes you smile, the fifth you start laughing, and (in my case at least) by the seventh you're strugging to breath.

Here, instead of rakes, we have layers of subterfuge. The old joke about gullible in the dictionary has been reversed, but so has your expectations, because of the old joke. So you don't click, because you know the article will be there; but in fact it really isn't. I think that's ace.

:titler:

I've just sneaked a look at Gaywood's diary:

Quote:
Friday 1pm - Elementary Egg Sucking (at grandma's house)

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:17 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32624
myp wrote:
I've just sneaked a look at Gaywood's diary:
Quote:
Friday 1pm - Elementary Egg Sucking (at grandma's house)
Oh, I see. You are lampooning me. It's a simple lampoon.

I thought linking it to the rakes was pretty clever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 13:20 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Dr Ying Fu Yip. Wang Shong. Pang Fang Wang Dang Dong Ning Po Ku.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 14:01 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
Wiki have fixed it now.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 14:03 
User avatar
UltraMod

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 55719
Location: California
Not a chance.

_________________
I am currently under construction.
Thank you for your patience.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Did you know Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for...
PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 14:15 
User avatar
Bouncing Hedgehog

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 26100
Plissken wrote:
Wiki have fixed it now.


Yea!

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.