Be Excellent To Each Other

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15507374

Bet a few had him in the pool...

He didn't visit Michael Barrymore, did he?

Nah, Sutcliffe got him.

Chinny had that picture hidden up his sleeve somewhere.

Junkie bitch had it coming.

[/APOD]

paedophile.

40 million raised for charity, lived in his mum's council flat. :rip:

I thought you had done that pciture yourself until I googled it

What on earth where they doing shaking hands with him? Have we forgotton how many women he killed?

You're being a bit harsh on Our Frank there.

I think he confused him with Tyson.

Damn. Stupid no reception in pub

Who is it?

Peter Sutcliffe AKA The Yorkshire Ripper.

Here's the story Chinny linked after my WTF moment at the picture. It's still a bit WTF, but if the story's to be believed then fair play to Frank.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... 270180.ece

Looks more like Demis Roussos.

Savile.

RIP

Sutcliffe was born in Bingley. Probably lived in this house.

*looks at title* shittest zombie movie ever.

The Communards were ok, but I could never get on with his solo stuff.

Good enough place. Sadowitz. 2011. Genius.

The concrete entombed coffin takes on greater significance now.

Good call.

You would think there would be a better time to sell this!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/150919044335? ... 1438.l2649

Amazing!

Oops

http://news.sky.com/story/996611/buyer- ... yce-gutted

Sounds like a solipsistic, frivolous berk. "Grr, stupid 'child abuse' story messing up my speculation opportunity!"

Bit harsh. It was a charity auction, they aren't generally places to go to pick up a bargain.

Well, yes; yes they are.

Slightly more seriously, what kind of fucking idiot plans could they be anyway? His entire idea and the worth he placed on the thing was based on it being known as being Jimmy Saville's car. Even if all this stuff hadn't come out, what little cachet such a thing would have brought would've dwindled massively over time because (a) young kids don't know or give a shit who Jimmy Saville is and (b) few people who're at the time in their life to be likely to be getting married over the next few years would see any value in a Jimmy Saville themed car. He's basically bought a quite nice, slightly customised Rolls Royce; which could indeed be hired out for things like weddings but not for a much higher price than any other Rolls Royce would command. He'll make pretty much the same with it when he drops all connections to Jimmy Saville as he would've anyway; the only difference is that he's massively over-paid to buy the thing in the first place because he's a fucking idiot.

Right, so he was obviously just a "fucking idiot" with a shit business plan, there was no element of philanthropy involved in his decision to buy the car at the charity auction. I think trying to get any money back is a fool's errand but I can't help but feel a bit sorry for him.

He should see if Matthew Kelly wants to buy it.

I only commented about the awfulness of his business plan so I don't know why you're making assumptions about things I didn't say or even imply about any other motives he might have had. I'm also not sure why you feel the need to put fucking idiot in quotes or why the hostility in general here.

Now that you've brought it up though, from the article alone he's rocked up to moan purely and only about the potential money he's lost; and to talk about how he can't tell his wife about the money he spent because she'll go mad. Oh, and to threaten legal action to try and recover some of what he spent of course. Neither you or I have any idea how much "philanthropy" was actually involved in his decision but does any of that sound to you like a man interested in charity?

Probably because I just thought it seemed like something of a bile-filled post with pretty much no justification. I don't care especially, it's not like I know the guy or he will ever read any of this but I was really just pointing out a slightly different interpretation of the facts. He bought the car as he says "on a whim" not as some sort of hard-headed business decision which he deserved to have backfire on him. I'd tend towards the view that his motives were probably, at least in part, charitable.

He is lucky the Police hasn't made the car a crime scene!

It just gets worse 100's of people coming forward

Jimmy Savile's family have had the gravestone removed along with the flowers as a mark of respect. It just leaves a small hole and no bush around it. Just what he would have wanted.

Dear Jim'll fix it, there's a girl in my class that I really fancy, can you fix it for me to go on holiday with her? Signed Jeremy Forrest, age 30

Also, it's scary how prescient that Jimmy Savile porn turned out to be.

Weeeelll, a mark of respect would have been them pissing on it.

mega heh

Whilst there can be smoke without a fire (eg Matthew Kelly fiasco) obviously lots of evidence has been buried with this and will now be uncovered.


I hope its not a sign of things to come though "wait for celeb to die, wait a few months then pile shit on them"

Hope you see my P.O.V. here, not playing devils advocate in this particular case.

Indeed. I've just read the John peel story. On the basis that you can't libel the dead, I fear that we're in for a lot more of this.

Yeah, but didn't john peel marry her, and plus forrins marry 13 year olds still.

I think the peel thing is that he didn't know she was underage/she told him he was older. It was in his biography that came out years ago so it's a bit odd they're dragging it up now. Either way, it seems pretty clear he wasn't out looking for underage girls on purpose....

I'm always going to be more inclined to defend peel, and yes I recall that his wife was younger from his biography. However, this appears to be a new story about another 15 year old.

Hmmm - an ex BBC employee with a sirname of Chinnery ....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19939349

Apparently Savile said he wasn't a nonce, thus he could not possibly have been one because paedophiles always tell the truth.

They should dig up his body and lock him in a room with a necrophiliac.

Where do you find a 13 year old necrophiliac?

Slayer concert.

More to the point, what's the lock for?

The lock would be removed once the necrophiliac had sufficiently violated Savile's corpse.

If they're a necrophiliac why would they need to be locked in? They're going to enjoy it without being forced to do it by locking them in.

Also, how does this punish Savile?

If you're going to lock someone in a room until the sufficiently violate jimmy saviles corpse, I'm not sure that them being predisposed to necrophilia before entering the room would be necessary.

These flaws and questions need to be ironed out before we implement it but they are minor snags in an otherwise excellent proposal.

I'm no expert on necrophilia, but I'd have thought the the recently deceased attractive type would have been their preferred shag, rather than the rancid skeletal corpse of an elderly predatory teeny fucker?

And it punishes Savile by traumatising his spirit, obviously.

I'll ask Mrs AE about it, she's into all that spiritual stuff.