Derek The Halls wrote:
It's a bit unfortunate but maybe if you're paying these things it makes the piracy feel a little less bad?
Well I resubscribed to Netflix purely because I was 'obtaining' Season 2 of Better Call Saul from elsewhere and it just seemed right to tip the cash over to them as they're providing Better Call Saul in this country.
(I'm still 'obtaining' Season 2 of BCS and squireling it away on the NAS (I haven't watched a single episode of the second season on Netflix itself), because I trust my ability to archive data over the years more than I do streaming digital content providers to maintain a service in perpetuity and/or retain rights to content, as stuff just flat out disappears from Netflix and Amazon Prime on a regular basis, as I discovered the hard way when a good chunk of my 'Watch List' vanished from Netflix before I'd had chance to actually watch it.)
Ultimately I have no idea what the solution to the new world order when it comes to 'content' is, because first it was music and now it's video (i.e. film/television/whatever) that has no real 'value' insofar as it's all available digitally, no physical product is required, and for a lot of folks there's no reason not to simply download and consume it for zero cost.
In an ideal world I suppose all the 'creators' would work together and share a reasonable amount of revenue for the works they produce, but if you look at what's happened to music maybe that won't happen (Portishead and their millions of streams on Spotify for a few thousand quid spring to mind).
Personally I love the BBC Licence Fee model, and cheerfully pay that every year just for the Radcliffe & Maconie show on Radio 6. Make everyone chip in a bit, and create enough content such that everyone can find something they like.