Be Excellent To Each Other

Interesting.

Interesting.

Begs the question as to why they don't just use the bus lanes as Olympic lanes where they have them, though.

They're using the outside lane as the games lane as a matter of course. Probably to avoid people parking on the inside lane - though that would suggest that anyone overtaking a parked car would have to stray into the games lane.

Depends on the direction you have to turn off that road to get to the stadium, doesn't it?

Oh, my!

London is cold wet and unpleasant says Chinese hurdler, who fucks off to Germany to train.

Thats not the best photo either. If you step back, there are merge left and merge right arrows pointing towards each other.

Everyone's a critic.

Unfortunate shape for the bottle in an advert I just saw on that page:

huh I should have stuck with running.

Everyone's a critic.

Apparently a big joke was one of the US long-distance runners popped his cork within a minute or two with more than one of the nice ladies

Going for his personal best in everything. A true champion.

Interestingly

Olympics security: MoD prepares to call up 2,000 more troops for G4S shortfall

Ministry of Defence makes urgent plans to mobilise up to 2,000 more troops if security firm cannot deliver target of 7,000 staff


The Ministry of Defence is urgently making preparations to call up as many as 2,000 more troops for Olympic security if G4S fails to deliver on its revised target of 7,000 staff in place by next week's opening ceremony, Whitehall sources say.

Fresh urgency was injected into the contingency preparations after defence officials started working with G4S in the last few days and gained a better understanding of the problems facing . Whitehall sources told the Guardian the contingency involved the possibility of calling up between 500 and 2,000 more troops.

The home secretary, Theresa May, who only last Wednesday authorised the call-up of 3,500 extra troops to bail out the private security company, has not made any further official request for troops and is working to avoid exactly that situation.

The chief executive of the London 2012 organisers, Paul Deighton, in effect took control of the G4S operation on Tuesday alongside senior Home Office officials, working through venue security rotas "line by line" in a desperate attempt to avoid the embarrassment of a fresh call-up.

This effort came as the G4S chief executive, Nick Buckles, admitted to MPs he couldn't guarantee to provide 7,000 trained and screened security guards by next Friday. Buckles has a list of 5,500 ready-to-deploy guards and is adding to them at a rate of 500 a day, but astonished MPs by telling them that even at this late stage he couldn't predict the scale of "no-shows" until recruits failed to respond to an email.

If G4S reaches its 7,000 target, the MoD will not be called upon again. "But it is a big if," said a Whitehall source. "The military would prefer the Home Office to make the decision on whether to provide more military personnel sooner rather than later." Commanders have asked for a "decision point" – a moment this week when ministers look at the actual number of security guards being provided by G4S, and mobilise the MoD to fill in the gaps. Though leaving the decision until next week will give G4S more time, it is a high-risk strategy that will make deploying more troops more difficult, the source said.

Sports minister Hugh Robertson admitted that there was a chance further troops would be required, and said there was no way of knowing how many G4S staff would turn up to work. "We're not absolutely sure of either of those two things. There is enough slack in the system to deal with some slippage either way. Nothing is certain, we keep it under constant review. We're confident that having had a problem presented to us last Wednesday, we've taken all the action we need to address that and build a bit of slack into the system."

Lord Coe, London 2012 organising committee chairman, again insisted that security would not be compromised. "My responsibility is to make sure that we get a Games that is safe and secure. We will do that, and it is to make sure that our teams, the Home Office and the military sit alongside G4S and mobilise and deploy exactly who we need to," he said.

An MoD spokesman said: "As the defence secretary made clear at the weekend, should there be a requirement for additional military personnel the MoD will do whatever possible to make them available. At the present time no further requests have been received but, as people would expect, an ongoing programme of prudent planning continues."

"If you are saying to me would I rather not be here, then the answer to that is of course. It would be ridiculous to say anything other than that. But my task is to deliver that. It was never about numbers, G4S interviewed 100,000 people, but it is about making sure they turn up."

The confidence of MPs at Westminster in the private company's ability to deliver even their revised target of 7,000 security guards drained away during the two-hour grilling of the company's chief executive before the Commons home affairs select committee on Tuesday.

Buckles was forced to agree the episode had been a "humiliating shambles" that had left his company's reputation in tatters. He said he regretted signing the £284m Olympic security contract, which had only been taken on to "boost the company's reputation". The potential £10m profit had turned into a projected £30m-£50m loss and the company had already dropped any hopes of bidding for the security contracts for the next football World Cup, or Olympic Games, which will be held in Brazil.

He to foot the bill for any extra military or policing costs, including funding a £500-a-head bonus for armed forces personnel who have to be brought back from leave, but outraged MPs when he insisted that G4S still planned to keep the £57m "management fee" for the contract despite a woeful performance.

Buckles also defied expectations by insisting there was no question of his immediate resignation: "It's not about me; it's about delivering the contract. I'm the right person to ensure that happens," he said.

Buckles said he was told about the recruitment problems when he was on holiday in the US on 3 July, and flew home the same day. The paper trail submitted to the committee makes clear Home Office ministers and officials, including James Brokenshire, and security supremo Charles Farr, were kept in the loop daily from that point. It was another eight days before the home secretary said the scale of the problem had "crystallised" to the point where it was apparent G4S could not supply its original target of 10,400 guards and she had to call in the extra 3,500 troops.

But Buckles did not blame Home Office officials or ministers, telling MPs that he was "100% responsible" for what had gone wrong.

The verdict from the MPs was damning. The committee chairman, Keith Vaz, said Buckles's evidence had given the impression of a company that was "unacceptable, incompetent and amateurish".

As it was being delivered, the defence secretary, Philip Hammond, confirmed that 2,500 of the additional military personnel are to be housed in an exhibition centre at Wapping in east London. Tobacco Dock is a grade 1-listed, converted 19th-century warehouse. The remaining 1,000 troops are to be housed in temporary accommodation in Hainault, Essex and on military bases.

1996 Euros weren't sold out by quite a margin, IIRC.

I have to say, all the shocked surprise at the G4S stuff really does go to show that the switch from calling themselves Group 4 Security was one of the most successful rebranding exercises I've seen.

I have to say, all the shocked surprise at the G4S stuff really does go to show that the switch from calling themselves Group 4 Security was one of the most successful rebranding exercises I've seen.

And weren't held in the UK, IIRC.

Okay, something serious has happened in the "sports" section of my brain.

Especially when Mali is involved.

I can just see this kind of thing happening with the Football Euro Championships, World Cup, Rugby World Cup, Six Nations, Cricket World Cup etc. if held in the UK - i.e. stuff that we actually do care about and as a consequence, able to stand on their own two feet as events.

Watching the news last night, I was interested to learn that many hundreds of thousands of Olympics tickets remain unsold (in fact, up to one million of them, depending on which statistic you look at/believe), despite their already having given hundreds of thousands of 'em away for nowt. Loads of stuff on the web about it, but here's a typical link:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 53201.html

I mean, fuck me. I well remember all the proud boasts about "chock full venues" and the like, but the reality is that they can't give 'em away, even after embarrassingly closing off half the venue capacities and all the rest in a frantic attempt to reduce capacity, mere weeks off the event itself?

Most of the unsold (and now cancelled) tickets are football which never sells out. Which draws you to the conclusion that A - Football is a shit olympic sport, and B- if it isn't popular they should scrap it.

The chief executive of the London 2012 organisers, Paul Deighton, in effect took control of the G4S operation

Maybe it would've sold better if they were staging the London Olympics Football in fucking London instead of fucking up hundreds-of-miles-away Manchester as well.