Zardoz wrote:
I'd like to see the list of contestants first.
| Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
| Bits & Bobs 31 https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7709 |
Page 15 of 60 |
| Author: | Zardoz [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I'd like to see the list of contestants first. |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I'd probably just watch it anyway. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Zardoz wrote: I'd like to see the list of contestants first.
|
|
| Author: | zaphod79 [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Would it be 'censored' for TV or not ? I'd probably record / torrent it and watch some bits of it and jump past other bits. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Trooper wrote: Zardoz wrote: I'd like to see the list of contestants first. Rubbish 
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
zaphod79 wrote: Would it be 'censored' for TV or not ? I figure it would have to be. |
|
| Author: | Malc74 [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:29 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Zardoz wrote: I'd like to see the list of contestants first. Jimmy Saville Clive Dunn June Brown Anne Widdecombe Andrew Lloyd-Webber |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:30 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Grim... wrote: zaphod79 wrote: Would it be 'censored' for TV or not ? I figure it would have to be. You'd still see jumper pillows and the occasional growler though, I assume? |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Fuck yeah. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
What would the scoring criteria be? |
|
| Author: | MrChris [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Re: the 80mph thing - was reading Charlie Brooker's take on it (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... peed-limit - largely AGREE, here), and amusing myself with the comments. Lo and behold, someone posts a link to the wosblog! http://wosland.podgamer.com/?p=11800 Predicta-ha at the black/white take on it there. EDIT - just read the comments on wosblog - oh no, Brooker's nto taking it back, is he? Loser. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:46 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Craster wrote: What would the scoring criteria be? Presumably not the Craster Scale. |
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Craster wrote: What would the scoring criteria be? It's judged, so out of ten at each judges discretion. It'll be critiqued too, obv. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: Craster wrote: What would the scoring criteria be? Presumably not the Craster Scale. Nobody got my Craster Scale joke in the wrestling thread. 
|
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:56 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Mr Kissyfur wrote: Re: the 80mph thing - was reading Charlie Brooker's take on it (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... peed-limit - largely AGREE, here), and amusing myself with the comments. Lo and behold, someone posts a link to the wosblog! http://wosland.podgamer.com/?p=11800 Predicta-ha at the black/white take on it there. EDIT - just read the comments on wosblog - oh no, Brooker's nto taking it back, is he? Loser. That's a really rubbish blog post by Stu (and, in fairness, a poor one from Brooker too). |
|
| Author: | Decca [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 15:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
RevStu was incorrect in his penis resuming in those comments, it's accepted to be from the tip of the penis to the pubic bone as that's what will enter the vagina.1 1. rescue me |
|
| Author: | flis [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: I probably wouldn't admit to watching it... Trooper wrote: Zardoz wrote: I'd like to see the list of contestants first. You should all be ashamed of yourselves! Curio, you watch the X Factor. And tweet about it!....As if Strictly Cum Fucking would be any more immoral and shameful than that. Also: As if knowing who the contestants were would make a difference! If they're fit, sweet! If they're mingers, even better, it'll be worth watching for gruesome factor! It'd be awesome! Also also: Happy B'day Grim...aldi. Your prezzies sound ace 
|
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Not sure if it's just me not having been able to drink for 3 weeks, but X Factor hasn't seemed as good this year. I really like Gary Barlow, and find Louis funny in that he doesn't even take it vaguely seriously and is intentionally just spouting cliches, but I found very, very few of the contestants this year to be even vaguely likeable. There's Big Craig in the boys category, the two Essex girls in the groups, Amelia in the girls and Frank Spencer in the old types. The rest are mostly annoying, especially Kitty and Frankie, both of whom I would happily punt in the face. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:10 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: There's Big Craig in the boys category, the two Essex girls in the groups, Amelia in the girls and Frank Spencer in the old types. The rest are mostly annoying, especially Kitty and Frankie, both of whom I would happily punt in the face. Pretty much However I like Janet too.Frankie and Kitty are both hateful people. I would have liked Jade and Terry to go through though... |
|
| Author: | flis [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Trooper wrote: Curiosity wrote: There's Big Craig in the boys category, the two Essex girls in the groups, Amelia in the girls and Frank Spencer in the old types. The rest are mostly annoying, especially Kitty and Frankie, both of whom I would happily punt in the face. Pretty much However I like Janet too.Frankie and Kitty are both hateful people. I would have liked Jade and Terry to go through though... Get out, get out now! What are you doing?! There's an X Factor thread isn't there!? You're ruining BnB!!!!!!!!  srsly? Gary Barlow? 
|
|
| Author: | GazChap [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Grim... wrote: Would you watch it? Only for about 5 minutes. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:16 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
flis wrote: Get out, get out now! What are you doing?! There's an X Factor thread isn't there!? You're ruining BnB!!!!!!!! You started it. And nobody reads BnB anymore, so it's fine to talk here 
|
|
| Author: | DavPaz [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:21 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I personally haven't read B&B for months. Load of tosh.  Look, everywhere! |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:33 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? Maybe being on a silly little island makes you immune to his charms... Trooper- I guarantee Terry will be on TV Burp next week, unless the BIG TWIST is the same as, or similar to, last year. Which wouldn't surprise me, to be honest, as they really built up Jade, John and Terry... maybe they have a SURPRISE FIFTH JUDGE with the 'cast-offs' category. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I reckon the BIG TWIST will be that they have to swap categories, or will each get a contestant from each category. |
|
| Author: | flis [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? Maybe being on a silly little island makes you immune to his charms... Trooper- I guarantee Terry will be on TV Burp next week, unless the BIG TWIST is the same as, or similar to, last year. Which wouldn't surprise me, to be honest, as they really built up Jade, John and Terry... maybe they have a SURPRISE FIFTH JUDGE with the 'cast-offs' category. Nah, GB would totes get it, natch. I just didn't realise he was a judge on't X Factor......I thought he was a guest or something. |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Trooper wrote: I reckon the BIG TWIST will be that they have to swap categories, or will each get a contestant from each category. Or that the person receiving the lowest votes in Week One will be forced to spend a month in Louis's sex dungeon. |
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 16:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
flis wrote: Curiosity wrote: Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? Maybe being on a silly little island makes you immune to his charms... Trooper- I guarantee Terry will be on TV Burp next week, unless the BIG TWIST is the same as, or similar to, last year. Which wouldn't surprise me, to be honest, as they really built up Jade, John and Terry... maybe they have a SURPRISE FIFTH JUDGE with the 'cast-offs' category. Nah, GB would totes get it, natch. I just didn't realise he was a judge on't X Factor......I thought he was a guest or something. Talking about x-factor judges, Tulisa would totally get it too. Mrs T has the same dress Tulisa was wearing last night, which didn't sell on ebay a week ago when she put it up. Now I say she should put it up again with "AS SEEN ON TV" etc... and sell it for loads. She now wants to keep it because it was on tv 
|
|
| Author: | Mimi [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? No. She's not. Really? Gary Barlow? Really?? |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:05 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Evidently from the same school of nominative determinism as Robin Mahfood, I was happy to see today that the Head of Policy at Stonewall is called Sam Dick. From the story on passports being altered to allow an option to have 'parent one' and 'parent two' instead of 'mother' and 'father' for same sex couples. That's (IMO) a good, eminently sensible idea, which is of course being opposed by some silly 'family values' group. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15150526 |
|
| Author: | Mimi [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:06 ] |
| Post subject: | Bits & Bobs 31 |
Happy Birthday Grim... Cake and happy things to you xx |
|
| Author: | Curiosity [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Mimi wrote: Curiosity wrote: Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? No. She's not. Really? Gary Barlow? Really?? To be fair, he looks gorgeous on X Factor at the moment. He has aged very, very well. 
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:08 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: From the story on passports being altered to allow an option to have 'parent one' and 'parent two' instead of 'mother' and 'father' for same sex couples. That's (IMO) a good, eminently sensible idea, which is of course being opposed by some silly 'family values' group. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15150526 I disagree with "parent 1" and "parent 2". "Parent:" and "Parent:" would be much better. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
What about threesome parents? It should be a multiline box headed PARENTAL ENTITIES: |
|
| Author: | Zardoz [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:16 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Key investors Alpha & Beta. |
|
| Author: | BikNorton [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:17 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Mimi wrote: Happy Birthday Grim... Wait, when is this?
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:21 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Craster wrote: What about threesome parents? It should be a multiline box headed PARENTAL ENTITIES: You still can't legally do that. Singles or doubles only. |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Racists. |
|
| Author: | Alarm [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
It was my birthday yesterday and only one person from here wished me happy birthday, and that was a day late, on Twitter.
|
|
| Author: | Trooper [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:23 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Curiosity wrote: Mimi wrote: Curiosity wrote: Flis? Are you the only woman in the country not to have a crush on Gary Barlow? No. She's not. Really? Gary Barlow? Really?? To be fair, he looks gorgeous on X Factor at the moment. He has aged very, very well. In the "Judges i'd screw" ranking, he sits in a solid 3rd place... |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:25 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Alarm wrote: It was my birthday yesterday and only one person from here wished me happy birthday, and that was a day late, on Twitter. Aw man, sorry! Happy birthday! Weekends are going to get less visitors to the front page, unfortunately. Whatcha get?! |
|
| Author: | Malc74 [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:28 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Grim... wrote: Curiosity wrote: From the story on passports being altered to allow an option to have 'parent one' and 'parent two' instead of 'mother' and 'father' for same sex couples. That's (IMO) a good, eminently sensible idea, which is of course being opposed by some silly 'family values' group. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15150526 I disagree with "parent 1" and "parent 2". "Parent:" and "Parent:" would be much better. Quote: "Sam Dick, head of policy at gay rights group Stonewall..." I'm sorry, but I laughed.
|
|
| Author: | Grim... [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Alarm wrote: It was my birthday yesterday and only one person from here wished me happy birthday, and that was a day late, on Twitter. Happy Birthday! 
|
|
| Author: | Malc [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I always thought it would be easier if there were 4 parents in a family, then at any one point, 3 of them could be working, 1 looking after the kids, and you could probably arrange that to be done in shifts too, having 4 incomes... A lot more money coming in, you could afford the bigger home to house everyone, and have more money left over too... Malc |
|
| Author: | Morte [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:50 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Is Xbox Live effed up for everyone else? Can't access either the website or Live? |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 17:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
yeah, it's screwed. |
|
| Author: | Morte [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 18:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
effing typical |
|
| Author: | lasermink [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 18:03 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
Grim... wrote: Craster wrote: What about threesome parents? It should be a multiline box headed PARENTAL ENTITIES: You still can't legally do that. Singles or doubles only. Which is an interesting subject, actually. What, exactly, makes "2" the perfect number of parents? EDIT: Or, in general, the perfect number of people in a relationship. |
|
| Author: | Bobbyaro [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 18:04 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
I'm going to make some food, and it better be fixed by the time I get back! |
|
| Author: | Cras [ Mon Oct 03, 2011 18:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bits & Bobs 31 |
lasermink wrote: Which is an interesting subject, actually. What, exactly, makes "2" the perfect number of parents? EDIT: Or, in general, the perfect number of people in a relationship. Perfect is difficult, but biology makes it the default number, obv. |
|
| Page 15 of 60 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|