Be Excellent To Each Other

And, you know, party on. Dude.

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 22:40 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
Grim... wrote:
Oh, now YouPorn is on my front page. Arses.


You should use their "PORN MODE!" (pg 22 or 23 of the comic) more.

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 22:41 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10101
Chrome does the insta-scroll-to-bottom with my laptop's scroll-edge too. The only downside so far, apart from being a bit worried about the simplicity of the cookie settings after Firefox's (more trouble than it's worth at times) whitelist.

Drag-resizeable textareas (like the one you write a post in, look at the bottom-right corner of it) are an awesome touch.

Is putting the Google logo at the right of the titlebar instead of using the standard Windows drawing strictly necessary, though?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 22:56 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Craster wrote:
Well then FF is also rubbish.

I was under the impression that it was a quite simple no-cache meta that IE was actually obeying.


This is why god invented tabs. Simply middle click your way up the "read unread posts" links.

Backing back to the index after every tab would piss me off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 23:11 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
This is quite nice. There doesn't seem to be much in the way of options though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 23:52 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1873
needs mouse-gestures.

_________________
PlayStation Country


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 23:54 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
BikNorton wrote:
Drag-resizeable textareas (like the one you write a post in, look at the bottom-right corner of it) are an awesome touch.

They've been in Safari for a while.
BikNorton wrote:
Is putting the Google logo at the right of the titlebar instead of using the standard Windows drawing strictly necessary, though?

What? Where?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 0:55 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49233
Dudley wrote:
Backing back to the index after every tab would piss me off.


?

I hit the back button. Y'know, to go back.

Grim... wrote:
I still think that IE's behaviour is wrong, however. The back button should never cause a refresh.


For a static page, I totally agree. For a page that is dynamically generated, I totally disagree.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:04 
User avatar
Where are you?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1639
Grim... wrote:
BikNorton wrote:
Drag-resizeable textareas (like the one you write a post in, look at the bottom-right corner of it) are an awesome touch.

They've been in Safari for a while.

Which is why they're in Chrome—it's got the same guts. That said, Chrome bizarrely supports less CSS than Safari, which is a bit mental.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:06 
User avatar
Gogmagog

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 48735
Location: Cheshire
refesh database tables to prevent sql inkections must they do. And have pictures of boobies.

_________________
Mr Chris wrote:
MaliA isn't just the best thing on the internet - he's the best thing ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:35 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
Craster wrote:
Dudley wrote:
Backing back to the index after every tab would piss me off.


?

I hit the back button. Y'know, to go back.


After every thread? Possibly backing up multiple pages if it was a long thread?

Fuck that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:35 
User avatar
making out to faces of death

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 2686
Location: Sadville
Grim... wrote:
Oh, now YouPorn is on my front page. Arses.


:DD You doofus. tube8 is better...

_________________
Me flickr
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:46 
User avatar
Isn't that lovely?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 11008
Location: Devon
If I hit back in FF then I get no refresh, so I rarely use back, I just click on "Be Excellent To Each Other" (or "General Discussion") at the top there when I have finished reading a topic, and then lo and behold automatic updates.

After using it last night, I think it will need some getting used to, also, I was playing some flash game (ant buster) and after about 15 minutes or so it hung. No problem thought I, I will just close the tab, and that will be problem solved. I clicked the cross, and nothing happened, I tried changing tabs, nothing happened, the whole app had frozen, after a bit more clicking I (and the flash game's music stuttering every now and again) eventually the tab was closed, but still everything was sluggish and horrible. So I tried to close chrome, but nothing happened. In the end I had to "end task" it. I thought the whole point of chrome was so that you didn't need to do all that crap?!!?!?

I guess I will keep an eye out for future releases, but for now I will stick with FF

Malc

_________________
Where's the Kaboom? I was expecting an Earth shattering Kaboom!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:28 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10101
Grim... wrote:
BikNorton wrote:
Drag-resizeable textareas (like the one you write a post in, look at the bottom-right corner of it) are an awesome touch.

They've been in Safari for a while.
I've never used Safari, so haven't seen it before. Old or new, it's still awesome.
Grim... wrote:
BikNorton wrote:
Is putting the Google logo at the right of the titlebar instead of using the standard Windows drawing strictly necessary, though?

What? Where?

In the title bar (at the top, with the minimise, maximise and close buttons at the right), where normally you'd have the system icon in the top-left corner of a window, then "Google Chrome" next to it. Instead they've hidden those and shoved the Google logo at the right - that is, 'Google' written in the font Google use to write 'Google', instead of having a proper logo. Pointless, silly work, especially when being fast and light is a benefit they're claiming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:01 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
So... The left, then?

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:12 
User avatar
Goth

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 3742
I notice google chrome doesn't allow middle mouse click for fetching up the draggy scroll thing. This is something I use all the time. Though today Firefox has started crashing when I right click.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:12 
User avatar
That Rev Chap

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 4924
Location: Kent
Hmm. Just had a download. It really does behave like Safari so far. Even down to hating iframes with a passion.

I really shouldn't have used them in my new site. I think I'm going to have to look for an alternative way of loading content pages into a common surround.

_________________
InvertY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:25 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
BikNorton wrote:
Grim... wrote:
BikNorton wrote:
Drag-resizeable textareas (like the one you write a post in, look at the bottom-right corner of it) are an awesome touch.

They've been in Safari for a while.
I've never used Safari, so haven't seen it before. Old or new, it's still awesome.
Grim... wrote:
BikNorton wrote:
Is putting the Google logo at the right of the titlebar instead of using the standard Windows drawing strictly necessary, though?

What? Where?

In the title bar (at the top, with the minimise, maximise and close buttons at the right), where normally you'd have the system icon in the top-left corner of a window, then "Google Chrome" next to it. Instead they've hidden those and shoved the Google logo at the right - that is, 'Google' written in the font Google use to write 'Google', instead of having a proper logo. Pointless, silly work, especially when being fast and light is a benefit they're claiming.


I don't see this logo.

My browser looks like this:
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y13/po ... mage-1.jpg
Warning: Big


It's quite cool, but it's a bit annoying in a few ways. With regards to this forum: The fact it doesn't have a TITLE BAR anywhere means Ican't tell which fucking thread I'm in! :S edit: Also, it doesn't work with facebook. Some of the little pop-up boxes don't pop-up. I submitted a bug report, of course =]

edit2: I couldn't sign up to photobucket with it properly :)

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:56 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
Quote:
Much ink and many electrons are being spilled over Google's Chrome browser (discussed here twice in recent days): from deep backgrounders to performance benchmarks to its vulnerability to a carpet-bombing flaw. The latest angle to be explored is Chrome's end-user license agreement. It does not look consumer-friendly. "By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services."


http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/03/0247205

So anything you do online with Chrome gets Google a royalty-free licence? Nice.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:57 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
Pod wrote:
My browser looks like this:

As does mine.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:58 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
Grim... wrote:
Quote:
Much ink and many electrons are being spilled over Google's Chrome browser (discussed here twice in recent days): from deep backgrounders to performance benchmarks to its vulnerability to a carpet-bombing flaw. The latest angle to be explored is Chrome's end-user license agreement. It does not look consumer-friendly. "By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services."


http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/03/0247205

So anything you do online with Chrome gets Google a royalty-free licence? Nice.


All your data are belong to us.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:58 
User avatar

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 25731
Pod wrote:
My browser looks like this:


Pod, you have two unread messages.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:59 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49233
Grim... wrote:
Quote:
Much ink and many electrons are being spilled over Google's Chrome browser (discussed here twice in recent days): from deep backgrounders to performance benchmarks to its vulnerability to a carpet-bombing flaw. The latest angle to be explored is Chrome's end-user license agreement. It does not look consumer-friendly. "By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services."


http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/03/0247205

So anything you do online with Chrome gets Google a royalty-free licence? Nice.


Wow. That's incredible.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:00 
User avatar

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 32621
Grim... wrote:
So anything you do online with Chrome gets Google a royalty-free licence? Nice.
Read the rest of the debate on Slashdot, it's likely not even true. Stupid slashdot summaries. You can also get the identical open source build from source control http://www.chromium.org and get it with no EULA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:04 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
Posted on the Guardian blogs, see if they pick up on it.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:05 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
richardgaywood wrote:
Grim... wrote:
So anything you do online with Chrome gets Google a royalty-free licence? Nice.
Read the rest of the debate on Slashdot, it's likely not even true. Stupid slashdot summaries. You can also get the identical open source build from source control http://www.chromium.org and get it with no EULA.

Gaywood has the time to read them all because, of course, the EvE server has shut down ;)

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:05 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
Mimi wrote:
Pod wrote:
My browser looks like this:


Pod, you have two unread messages.


I know! I read them now.
BETEO should really pop up a flashing box or something.

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:06 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
.. And one of them was "Pod, you have an unread message"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:07 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Pod wrote:
Mimi wrote:
Pod wrote:
My browser looks like this:


Pod, you have two unread messages.


I know! I read them now.
BETEO should really pop up a flashing box or something.


It's in the control panel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:35 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
kalmar wrote:
.. And one of them was "Pod, you have an unread message"


Unfortunately not! It would have been most amusing if it was. TERRIBLY AMUSING.

So why didn't you do it? :(

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:37 
User avatar
baron of techno

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 24136
Location: fife
I'm not here to provide you with amusement, Pod :nerd:

Now, this chrome thing. Nice. Is there a way to switch off image loading? 'Cos otherwise, I'm not really going to be using it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:43 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49233
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:45 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Craster wrote:
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.


It wouldn't be so bad if there was even an about:config page; I don't mind digging around in a beta. But there doesn't seem to be anything. It's fast though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:13 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10101
Grim... wrote:
Pod wrote:
My browser looks like this:

As does mine.

Bizarre, mine looks like this

It was only in the process of this comparison that I've noticed they're using Vista-style buttons instead of XP, too. Tsk tsk (I'm running it on XP, obviously).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:19 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 158
Ooh Mr. La-di-da and his XP - I haven't got to play with this yet at all, Mac at home and Windows 2000 Professional at work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:21 
User avatar
Sitting balls-back folder

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 10101
Craster wrote:
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.
It won't take long for patches on Chromium to appear, I'm sure. Chrome already has an about:plugins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:24 
User avatar
making out to faces of death

Joined: 1st Apr, 2008
Posts: 2686
Location: Sadville
kalmar wrote:
I'm not here to provide you with amusement, Pod :nerd:

Now, this chrome thing. Nice. Is there a way to switch off image loading? 'Cos otherwise, I'm not really going to be using it..


If you could switch off images, how would you see (and click on) all their doubleclick adverts?

_________________
Me flickr
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:24 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 8679
nynfortoo wrote:
Craster wrote:
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.


It wouldn't be so bad if there was even an about:config page; I don't mind digging around in a beta. But there doesn't seem to be anything. It's fast though.


These things may be connected.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 13:28 
User avatar
Part physicist, part WARLORD

Joined: 2nd Apr, 2008
Posts: 13421
Location: Chester, UK
Dudley wrote:
nynfortoo wrote:
Craster wrote:
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.


It wouldn't be so bad if there was even an about:config page; I don't mind digging around in a beta. But there doesn't seem to be anything. It's fast though.


These things may be connected.


Indeed, which is why I'm not wielding a pitchfork*

I'm impressed so far, anyway. Hopefully they won't fuck it up.



*Man, if anyone ever riots over a browser, they need shooting**

**Except IE, which itself needs shooting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:21 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
Apart from the slight speed increase and the big blue arrow when you download something, there is nothing about Chrome that impresses me, and those two are certainly not enough to stop me being fucked off that I have to test my sites in yet another cocking web browser. Hopefully this will go the same way as Google Talk.

[edit]Bwahahahah you dick - Love from Grim... in 2010
[edit]And again in 2013.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:23 
User avatar
MR EXCELLENT FACE

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 2568
BikNorton wrote:
Craster wrote:
That's the one thing that confused me. It appears to be the least customisable browser in existance.
It won't take long for patches on Chromium to appear, I'm sure. Chrome already has an about:plugins.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/About:#Google_Chrome-specific_about:_addresses

edit: ffs. Just copy and paste it :/

_________________
This man is bound by law to clear the snow away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:25 
SupaMod
User avatar
Commander-in-Cheese

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 49233
Yeah, that doesn't work either.

Seriously, people - writing an 'options' GUI is primary school stuff. What's with this about: bollocks?

_________________
GoddessJasmine wrote:
Drunk, pulled Craster's pork, waiting for brdyime story,reading nuts. Xz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:29 
User avatar
Comfortably Dumb

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 12034
Location: Sunny Stoke
Quote:
Dean Hachamovitch, general manager of Microsoft's Internet Explorer, was more bullish.

"The browser landscape is highly competitive, but people will choose Internet Explorer 8 for the way it puts the services they want right at their fingertips, respects their personal choices about how they want to browse and, more than any other browsing technology, puts them in control of their personal data online,"


From what I've seen of IE8, I'll only be using it to test sites in. FF3 all the way for anything else.

_________________
Consolemad | Under Logic
Curse, the day is long
Realise you don't belong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:36 
User avatar

Joined: 31st Mar, 2008
Posts: 925
Like richardgaywood said earlier, the search in page function is neat. I like how in the side scroll bar there are lines that show where the found items are.

And there are little things I like, for example when pasting an address in to the address bar there is a paste and go option. And the application shortcuts. (Only really used Firefox and IE, so don't know if these features are else where). And it loads so much faster than firefox, which I just ended up keeping open because it takes so long.

It does need a whole load more features though. Why isn't there easy syncing of bookmarks though Google Bookmarks for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 14:42 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5924
Location: Stockport - The Jewel in the Ring
Bluecup wrote:
And there are little things I like, for example when pasting an address in to the address bar there is a paste and go option.


Opera has had this for a while. I'm amazed that other browsers haven't nicked it before now.

_________________
Mint To Be Stationery - Looking for a Secret Santa gift? Try our online shops at Mint To Be.

Book me in the Face | Tweet me. Tweet me like a British nanny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 15:19 
User avatar
Where are you?

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 1639
I've had a play now and my final rating is "meh". In its current state, it beats IE, but I'd sooner use Firefox 3 or Opera on Windows. On Mac, I'd say Safari slightly bests it, too. (Having not used Safari/Win for ages, I've no idea what that browser's like on Windows.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 19:24 
User avatar
Worst

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 6197
Maybe someone mentioned and my lack of focus failed to see it, but the little 'Google' image is there if you view Chrome at default window size, while it vanishes should one maximise the browser.

My 'thoughts': Liked it a lot. Big window makes scrolling more fun (I write that as though scrolling is inherently fun), makes pages appear faster. Like the minimalism.

As time went on, opening new tabs slowed. Then it crashed entirely, taking the functionality of iTunes with it (a split-second of music rapidly repeating like a damaged CD). Had to reboot. I never had that kind of woe with FF3.

Still, it did mean I found myself near a radio and remembered to listen to Mark Watson. He is a funny jokemaker.

_________________
>Image<


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 22:01 

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 5318
throughsilver wrote:
I never had that kind of woe with FF3.


Betas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 22:06 
User avatar
Excellent Member

Joined: 30th Mar, 2008
Posts: 3542
i'm using but until they put something like costumized searches on top right corner i won't be using it again

edit: and i don't get the motion scrolling if i hit the middle button


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 23:43 
User avatar
Soopah red DS

Joined: 2nd Jun, 2008
Posts: 3244
RuySan wrote:
i'm using but until they put something like costumized searches on top right corner i won't be using it again


I wanna search like Batman. Or maybe a Police man. Or <explodes>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: chrome
PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 
SupaMod
User avatar
Est. 1978

Joined: 27th Mar, 2008
Posts: 69633
Location: Your Mum
People still use hotlink protection? FFS.

_________________
Grim... wrote:
I wish Craster had left some girls for the rest of us.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Columbo, Kern, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search within this thread:
You are using the 'Ted' forum. Bill doesn't really exist any more. Bogus!
Want to help out with the hosting / advertising costs? That's very nice of you.
Are you on a mobile phone? Try http://beex.co.uk/m/
RIP, Owen. RIP, MrC. RIP, Dimmers.

Powered by a very Grim... version of phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.