Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

The Movie topic
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3817
Page 294 of 426

Author:  LewieP [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 21:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Not really sure what the problem is with what I said.

I feel the same way about British actors doing bad American accents in films. Either cast an American, or let them speak in their own accent. Or hire an actor that can do a good job of the accent required.

Or are we just pretending that vocal performance isn't a component of acting?

As I said, I'd probably prefer her to be speaking in her native tongue (presumably Hebrew?) with subtitles, or hire another actor who can convincingly act and speak in English (or Greek with subtitles).

Author:  DavPaz [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 22:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Bah, you're just trolling now.

Author:  MrChris [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 22:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Image

Author:  Malc [ Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

LewieP wrote:
Not really sure what the problem is with what I said.

I feel the same way about British actors doing bad American accents in films. Either cast an American, or let them speak in their own accent. Or hire an actor that can do a good job of the accent required.

Or are we just pretending that vocal performance isn't a component of acting?

As I said, I'd probably prefer her to be speaking in her native tongue (presumably Hebrew?) with subtitles, or hire another actor who can convincingly act and speak in English (or Greek with subtitles).


But she's not trying to do an American accent, she's speaking English in her own (I presume) accent, I assume she was cast to show that she's not American, English, Australian whatever, to show she's from somewhere else, you can perfectly understand what she's saying so I don't really see a problem with it.

Author:  Curiosity [ Sat Nov 05, 2016 12:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Oh shit yes.


Author:  Pundabaya [ Sat Nov 05, 2016 13:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

That looks amazing. Batman was the best bit of the Lego Movie...

Author:  MrChris [ Sat Nov 05, 2016 13:34 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

That does look superb! Yay.

Author:  KovacsC [ Sat Nov 05, 2016 21:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

That looks awesome.

Author:  TheVision [ Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I watched the Lego movie last night. Needless to say, it was absolutely brilliant.

Author:  MaliA [ Sat Nov 12, 2016 22:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.

Author:  devilman [ Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

MaliA wrote:
Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.


I like films that just get straight to it, and Circle is one of those. Watched it a few times on Netflix and love it.

Author:  Goddess Jasmine [ Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:47 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Mechanic: Resurrection

It's a Statham film with added amazing locations. That's all you need to know.

Author:  JBR [ Sat Nov 12, 2016 23:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Race. Jesse Owens. The running bits are good. It makes a few very simple wider points. The Nazis are cardboard cut-out bad guys. S'alright.

Author:  MaliA [ Sun Nov 13, 2016 0:12 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

devilman wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Circle (2015, on Netflix): 15 to 1 with a twist because there are 50 people. But, no questions. Or William G. Stewart. It is nothing like 15 to 1. I really liked it. Unlike 15 to 1, that's shit.


I like films that just get straight to it, and Circle is one of those. Watched it a few times on Netflix and love it.


ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
had it been twins at the end, EPIC!

Author:  KovacsC [ Mon Nov 14, 2016 0:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Dr Strange, is really enjoyable.

A bit different from the rest of the marvel universe.
Hope they do another.

Author:  Dr Lave [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 0:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)

Author:  KovacsC [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

KovacsC wrote:
How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong.

Because the X-Men movies aren't Marvel, they are made by Fox.

Author:  Curiosity [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:10 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

KovacsC wrote:
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?


It fits in after the last one.

And it's not made by Marvel; they just sold the licensing to it years ago and can't get it back.

Author:  myp [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

See also Spider-Man (until recently) and the Fantastic Four.

Author:  Pundabaya [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

To the point that Marvel Comics refuse to create new X-men, or mutant characters in general, and aren't really doing much at all with the Fantastic 4.

Squirrel Girl has been revealed to not be a mutant recently, so Fox can't have her.

It's even possible that the next big crossover event will do away with the X-men... Replacing them with the Inhumans.

I'm guessing the feeling within Marvel is 'we can't use them in our movies, what's the point?'

Author:  KovacsC [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Curiosity wrote:
KovacsC wrote:
Watched X-Men: Apocalypse.

I got bored. How can Marvel get the Avengers Universe so right, yet X-men so wrong. Where does it fit in to the time line, have they rebooted x-men again?


It fits in after the last one.

And it's not made by Marvel; they just sold the licensing to it years ago and can't get it back.


That makes sense. ish

Author:  LewieP [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 15:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Dunno what's going to happen to the X-Men film series, given that McAvoy, Fassbender, Lawrence and that guy who plays beast all signed a (now completed) three film contact.

Obviously we've got Logan and Deadpool 2 on the horizon, but I think the main series is really losing steam, and if they can't at least get McAvoy and Fassbender back, they'll be in trouble.

Jennifer Lawrence isn't a bad actor, but they keep giving her rubbish material, and don't really have a clue what to do with Mystique. I can't see her doing another one, but who knows.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Kelsey grammar

Author:  Satsuma [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 16:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I don't think I've watched many of the old Bond films as a yoof so I watched Gold Finger for the first time. I mostly just enjoyed how Bond saves the day by shagging one of the villains at the end.

Author:  LewieP [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 18:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.

Author:  Dr Zoidberg [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....

Author:  Satsuma [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 19:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Dr Zoidberg wrote:
Dr Lave wrote:
Arrival is so very, very good.

Actual Science Fiction rather than 'an Action film in space'.

Thoughtful, beautiful, elegant.

Deserves a cinema viewing.

(But a dark cinema, it has lots of great low light scenes, that a shitty cinema might take the edge off.)


It is indeed great, but I came out wanting to rewatch Close Encounters.....


It's not that great nor could I romanticise about it being thoughtful, beautiful and elegant.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Ultimately, the main star acquires magical powers from out of nowhere. Or maybe she always had magic powers. Maybe we all have magic powers when we learn the space alien language. It was a bit daft.

Notwithstanding the silly premise, it has greater problems. It fails to explore the motivations of the rogue army folk who decide to explode the spaceship because, well, who knows because it doesn't, y'know... Not does it mention the attack after it happens. It's just an artificial action sequence in a film that's otherwise quite slow paced. The pacing was fine for me so why even include it.

And how come each-and-every-discovery made by the scientist woman is mirrored almost immediately by the Chinese government. The film sets her up as being super great and developing an understanding of the alien language when the rest of world is making no headway but, lo and behold, she's making identical progress with the Chinese. "I've just learned that this symbol meaning 'weapon.'" "Excuse me ma'am the Chinese scientist has been shot after this tape was leaked revealing that this symbol means weapon." "Oh noes!"

And whilst she's working on a program to decipher the alien language (which is said to be, like, several words, sentences and meanings in a ring pattern) she's suddenly fluent in alien ring language without the aid of her computer when she's sucked into the alien ship not long after, and all of a sudden alien language can be distilled into very short subtitles for the audience. I suppose the problem was that the timeline over which the film ran was unclear but it was never made clear whether they had been in contact with the aliens for weeks or months. Had they cut out the solider crap and given a realistic timeline for the contact I would have been assuaged but as it stands the last encounter with the aliens was deeply unsatisfying.

And some of the shots at the end of the film were insulting to the audience. In a reveal that lasts some 10 long minutes, miss scientist discovers she can see into the future and was married to...to...this blurry mess in the background, who only the most insipid among the audience hasn't already worked out is hawkeye. The shot lasts so long I was figgiting in my seat screaming "It's FUCKING hawkeye, just show FUCKING hawkeye." They really dragged it out beyond all comprehension.

And Amy Adams felt like she was a carbon copy of the Jodie Forster scientist from Contact. And hawkeye and substitute Matthew McWhatshisface, for better or worse. Hawkeye is the physicist but apparently does very little science when he's not acting as Amy Adams lapdog.

And Forest Whittaker? Man alive, this guy is a genius but he's given this godawful angry colonel role which requires him to be an arsehole to key science personnel. He rocks up in the dead of night in a helicopter to surprise lady science woman into offering her a job and gives her 10 minutes to get in the chopper for no reason than just to act like a cunt for the audience to think he's a hardass.

And some of the dialogue was trash. "Ask Dr Weneversee what the meaning of blah blah is?" It was yawnsome.

But anyway, it was ok but don't pretend it was a great film about what might happen if we really do meet aliens because the answer will probably not be "because Amy Adams has magic powers."

Author:  LewieP [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I enjoyed it, but yes Contact is the far better film.

How bloody good is Contact?

They are pretty different, but there's enough overlap to invite the comparison.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 16, 2016 20:19 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

LewieP wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Kelsey grammar

I meant to include a joke about this but it slipped my mind.


It was an answer in Curio's Less Than Completely Honest Cottage Quiz

Author:  JBR [ Sat Nov 26, 2016 22:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Suicide Squad. Um - very pretty use of colours? Made a good trailer? Film: utter gash.

Author:  Grim... [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Stand by for a fucking surprise, chums...





The Poltergeist remake is dogshit.





I know, right?

Author:  Grim... [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Okay, the bit where not-Caroline gets dragged up the stairs is pretty cool. But it is 80 minutes in.

Author:  Hearthly [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I watched THE NICE GUYS a couple of evenings ago, which I know was favourably mentioned in this thread a few months ago.

It was very good I thought, also very 'Shane Blackey' so if you didn't like KISS KISS BANG BANG this won't change your mind.

Gosling and Crowe have great onscreen chemistry, and I love Keith David too.

Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

Really good work on making everything very 70s-esque too. Cars were very cool in this time period.

ALSO FAT RUSSELL CROWE he won't be Gladiatroring anything any time soon that's for sure. Unless there are some pies that need taking care of with extreme prejudice.

Author:  Cras [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:03 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.

Author:  Hearthly [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Cras wrote:
I would note that if you don't like Kiss Kiss Bang Bang you're broken and wrong.


Well yes but there are people who still think The Walking Dead is good, so y'know, some folks are BONKERS.

CRAZY BONKERS.

Author:  Doctor Glyndwr [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:00 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Hearthly wrote:
Not sure if I'd say it was better or worse than KKBB (which I haven't watched for quite some time, maybe I need to rewatch it first), but it was a splendid watch and made me LOL several times.

The Nice Guys is excellent but I don't think it's quite as good as Kiss Kiss Bang Bang; then again I think Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is a fucking masterpiece. (I love Shane Black. I love Downey Jr. I love Raymond Chandler. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang could have been made for me.)

Author:  LewieP [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Yeah Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is on another level.

The Nice Guys is great though.

Author:  MaliA [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:24 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Would You Rather: Have a potato for a hand, or a crisp for a nose? Only worse.

Fairly entertaining. Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.

Author:  Satsuma [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."

Author:  MaliA [ Sat Dec 03, 2016 23:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Saturnalian wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."


{Googles}

Oh. My.

Author:  Grim... [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 13:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Saturnalian wrote:
MaliA wrote:
Has Sasha Grey in it. She's shit.


She's been in much better "films."

And Entourage!

Author:  Derek The Halls [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 17:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Response to some of the issues raised about Arrival

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Quote:
Ultimately, the main star acquires magical powers from out of nowhere. Or maybe she always had magic powers. Maybe we all have magic powers when we learn the space alien language. It was a bit daft.


She supposedly gained this power of seeing time in a non linear fashion due to study of the alien language. The language allows you to look at whatever time you like, a rather Kurt Vonnegut like thing. Tralfamadorians.


Quote:
It fails to explore the motivations of the rogue army folk who decide to explode the spaceship because, well, who knows because it doesn't, y'know... Not does it mention the attack after it happens. It's just an artificial action sequence in a film that's otherwise quite slow paced. The pacing was fine for me so why even include it.


It was showing how the media influence people in a negative way. And the fragility of human peace among humans. Right wing shock jocks are remarkably good at influencing people.


Quote:
And whilst she's working on a program to decipher the alien language (which is said to be, like, several words, sentences and meanings in a ring pattern) she's suddenly fluent in alien ring language without the aid of her computer when she's sucked into the alien ship not long after, and all of a sudden alien language can be distilled into very short subtitles for the audience. I suppose the problem was that the timeline over which the film ran was unclear but it was never made clear whether they had been in contact with the aliens for weeks or months. Had they cut out the solider crap and given a realistic timeline for the contact I would have been assuaged but as it stands the last encounter with the aliens was deeply unsatisfying.


She seemed to get more fluent in the language after meeting directly with the aliens.

Quote:
And some of the shots at the end of the film were insulting to the audience. In a reveal that lasts some 10 long minutes, miss scientist discovers she can see into the future and was married to...to...this blurry mess in the background, who only the most insipid among the audience hasn't already worked out is hawkeye. The shot lasts so long I was figgiting in my seat screaming "It's FUCKING hawkeye, just show FUCKING hawkeye." They really dragged it out beyond all comprehension.


Yeah I'll give you that. Of course she gets married to him.


Quote:
And Amy Adams felt like she was a carbon copy of the Jodie Forster scientist from Contact. And hawkeye and substitute Matthew McWhatshisface, for better or worse. Hawkeye is the physicist but apparently does very little science when he's not acting as Amy Adams lapdog.


Yep I wondered what physics he was up to and what role he could possibly have in helping translate the language. And I'll delete the rest as I largely agree with you.
[/quote]

Author:  Satsuma [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 22:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I love Studio Ghibli films.

The Red Turtle however is not great and I wasn't particularly happy with it at all. I'm sure it has a hidden meaning or something or it could be the entire story is:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The man sexed up a turtle and had a hybrid turtle man baby that went to live with his turtle relatives. The man died.


Still, better than My Neighbors the Yamadas, aye? Amirite? Y'know I am.

Author:  Grim... [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 23:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

I watched Spirited Away at the weekend. The imagination of the things is amazing.

Author:  Jem [ Mon Dec 05, 2016 14:15 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Took kids to see Moana on Saturday. It was nice. Cried a lot.

Author:  devilman [ Mon Dec 05, 2016 15:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Films I've watched recently ...

Deadpool - Very good dialogue but suffers a bit like Man of Steel in that watching near-invincible characters fighting is boring.

Guardians of the Galaxy - Everyone seems to love it but I didn't think much of the trailer so I've been putting it off for ages. Now I've finally seen it, I thought it was ok, but nothing more

Nineteen Eighty-Four - Interesting rather than entertaining. John Hurt is very good though, particularly during the torture scenes.

Last night I put Hitman:Agent 47 on for a bit, but switched it off after ten minutes. I thought Timothy Olyphant made a better Agent 47, so I'll just stick with that version.

Author:  Grim... [ Mon Dec 05, 2016 15:59 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

devilman wrote:
Deadpool - Very good dialogue but suffers a bit like Man of Steel in that watching near-invincible characters fighting is boring.

Mate.

devilman wrote:
Guardians of the Galaxy - Everyone seems to love it but I didn't think much of the trailer so I've been putting it off for ages. Now I've finally seen it, I thought it was ok, but nothing more

Mate.

devilman wrote:
Last night I put Hitman:Agent 47 on for a bit, but switched it off after ten minutes. I thought Timothy Olyphant made a better Agent 47, so I'll just stick with that version.

Ma... Yeah, actually.

Author:  DBSnappa [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

Tried to watch ID Resurgence the other night. It's crap, found it so enengaging I fell asleep before the end.
Did watch Star Trek: Beyond, which I enjoyed. Feels like it was made with proper love for the universe.

Author:  Grim... [ Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Movie topic

DBSnappa wrote:
Did watch Star Trek: Beyond, which I enjoyed. Feels like it was made with proper love for the universe.

Classical music!

Page 294 of 426 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/