Be Excellent To Each Other
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/

The Walking Dead
https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6455
Page 29 of 34

Author:  Zardoz [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Burning them gets rid of the cooties.

Author:  markg [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:17 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I thought that he was just sending the message that he would take their stuff but for no better reason than because he can, that they have nothing at all that he really wants or needs, nothing to bargain with. Or to make sure that when they lay their heads down at night, when sleep might give them some small respite from the misery that he'll make of their lives, even then he'll always be there. Love this guy.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

markg wrote:
I thought that he was just sending the message that he would take their stuff but for no better reason than because he can, that they have nothing at all that he really wants or needs, nothing to bargain with. Or to make sure that when they lay their heads down at night, when sleep might give them some small respite from the misery that he'll make of their lives, even then he'll always be there. Love this guy.

...and as a more important plot development point, it keeps the town angry, as opposed to falling into the wilful subservience that Egg and Negan are encouraging. Which means that, guess what, Negan may have made a Bad Decision which has implications for ensuring that some form of storyline can develop!

I really can't tell whether Hearthly is trolling or being thick on this. History has evens on both.

Author:  Satsuma [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I think you're all overthinking this. Negan's actions with the mattresses can be explained in just 3 words: he's a cunt.

Author:  Zardoz [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 11:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

It might have been an accident.

Author:  Curiosity [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I clearly wasn't paying attention very well, as I saw them taking the mattresses, but somehow missed him burning them. When was it?

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 12:42 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Mondays, 9pm, on Fox

Author:  Malc [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 13:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Curiosity wrote:
I clearly wasn't paying attention very well, as I saw them taking the mattresses, but somehow missed him burning them. When was it?

Right at the end, when Michone went back to the field, she saw smoke, went to investigate and stumbled across a pile of mattresses on fire.

Author:  MaliA [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 13:21 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Malc wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
I clearly wasn't paying attention very well, as I saw them taking the mattresses, but somehow missed him burning them. When was it?

Right at the end, when Michone went back to the field, she saw smoke, went to investigate and stumbled across a pile of mattresses on fire.


Or she walked into Bradford.

Author:  Curiosity [ Fri Nov 18, 2016 13:40 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Malc wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
I clearly wasn't paying attention very well, as I saw them taking the mattresses, but somehow missed him burning them. When was it?

Right at the end, when Michone went back to the field, she saw smoke, went to investigate and stumbled across a pile of mattresses on fire.


I didn't see her go back to the field at all. How odd.

Author:  MrChris [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 21:52 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Yo Grim..., TWD E5 doesn't seem to be working on ("sex" - Ed) - hen I try to play it it comes up with ("a great idea" - Ed), the ("auto responder" - Ed) crashed or failed to ("achieve an erecrion" - Ed)" - same on PS4, 360 and PC access to ("T-Rex" - Ed). Everything else seems to work fine on there.

Author:  Grim... [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 22:06 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I've no idea what you mean.

If I did know what you meant, I'd surely look into it of I know which series you meant..

Author:  MrChris [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 22:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I don't mean series 7 ep 5

Author:  Hearthly [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 23:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Latest episode was pretty bad, even by TWD's own somewhat low standards.

Extra points for the clanging great continuity error where a metal/plastic ladle changes into a wooden spoon from one sentence to the next.

My official line on TWD has always been that it's generally above average enough to warrant the relatively small investment of time required to keep up with it, but between the grinding unpleasantness and babbling incoherent nonsense that Season 7 has served up thusfar, one has to wonder if the hour a week could be better spent doing something more worthwhile, like trying to construct a small wig-wam for earwigs out of scavenged nasal hair.

Attachment:
magicspoon.JPG

Attachment:
magicspoon2.JPG

Author:  Curiosity [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 23:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Each week I watch this show, enjoy it, and wonder what ridiculous reason Hearthly will give for not liking it. Was it devoid of hope? Too much hope? Not enough happening? Too much happening? Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!

It was a spoon! I didn't see that coming.

I thought it was another good episode. It showed a different way in which 'life goes on', had many hopeful scenes amongst the oppressive hell in which they live, and it had Trevor from GTA being funny.

Author:  Hearthly [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 0:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

IT CHANGED INTO A SPOON.

Author:  Zardoz [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Curiosity wrote:
Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!

:D

Author:  KovacsC [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Curiosity wrote:
Each week I watch this show, enjoy it, and wonder what ridiculous reason Hearthly will give for not liking it. Was it devoid of hope? Too much hope? Not enough happening? Too much happening? Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!


:this:

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:08 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Hearthly wrote:
IT CHANGED INTO A SPOON.


There is no spoon.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I also didn't know until yesterday that the guy playing Jesus was a posh British chap, who had previously been in Skins.

EDIT - I have no idea if he is actually posh, but he speaks like Jack Whitehall.

Author:  Mr Dave [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Curiosity wrote:
I also didn't know until yesterday that the guy playing Jesus was a posh British chap, who had previously been in Skins.

Are you sure?

Author:  Satsuma [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 12:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Kung Fu Jesus. *sigh*

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 13:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

The guy with the moustache was pretty good.

Author:  Curiosity [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 13:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

MaliA wrote:
The guy with the moustache was pretty good.


Trevor from GTA V!

Author:  MrChris [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 13:33 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

He's in loads of things. LOADS.

Author:  Zardoz [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 14:01 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Liked him in Better Call Saul.

That even has Vaas from Far Cry 3 in it. The best computer game baddie ever.

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 21:41 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Curiosity wrote:
Each week I watch this show, enjoy it, and wonder what ridiculous reason Hearthly will give for not liking it. Was it devoid of hope? Too much hope? Not enough happening? Too much happening? Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!

It was a spoon! I didn't see that coming.

I thought it was another good episode. It showed a different way in which 'life goes on', had many hopeful scenes amongst the oppressive hell in which they live, and it had Trevor from GTA being funny.

I was telling the wife this story and as I did, found myself questioning how this continuity glitch was noted by a normal person.

Who didn't also note that Carl and Enid were walking to hilltop in the daylight, nighttime fires and crazy happened, and in the next scene were walking to hilltop in the daylight with no reference to them being away from Alexandria overnight.

Author:  Malc [ Tue Nov 22, 2016 22:38 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Each week I watch this show, enjoy it, and wonder what ridiculous reason Hearthly will give for not liking it. Was it devoid of hope? Too much hope? Not enough happening? Too much happening? Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!

It was a spoon! I didn't see that coming.

I thought it was another good episode. It showed a different way in which 'life goes on', had many hopeful scenes amongst the oppressive hell in which they live, and it had Trevor from GTA being funny.

I was telling the wife this story and as I did, found myself questioning how this continuity glitch was noted by a normal person.

Who didn't also note that Carl and Enid were walking to hilltop in the daylight, nighttime fires and crazy happened, and in the next scene were walking to hilltop in the daylight with no reference to them being away from Alexandria overnight.


non-linear story telling?

Author:  ApplePieOfDestiny [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 0:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Malc wrote:
ApplePieOfDestiny wrote:
Curiosity wrote:
Each week I watch this show, enjoy it, and wonder what ridiculous reason Hearthly will give for not liking it. Was it devoid of hope? Too much hope? Not enough happening? Too much happening? Let's spin the Wheel of Hearthly!

It was a spoon! I didn't see that coming.

I thought it was another good episode. It showed a different way in which 'life goes on', had many hopeful scenes amongst the oppressive hell in which they live, and it had Trevor from GTA being funny.

I was telling the wife this story and as I did, found myself questioning how this continuity glitch was noted by a normal person.

Who didn't also note that Carl and Enid were walking to hilltop in the daylight, nighttime fires and crazy happened, and in the next scene were walking to hilltop in the daylight with no reference to them being away from Alexandria overnight.


non-linear story telling?

Supports the spoon theory.

Author:  Hearthly [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 0:49 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Well yes, it's quite easy to think up all sorts of plausible explanations for Carl and Enid's jaunt out, but less easy to see how Maggie managed to magically transform a ladle into a spoon.

For Carl and Enid, they seem to operate semi-autonomously anyway (Enid in particular has been going off on trips outside the walls for as long as she's been in the programme as best I can recall), the whole community is under pressure to gather resources for The Saviours, so I can well believe Carl and Enid disappearing off overnight would go largely unnoticed and/or uncommented on.

As for the continuity error with the spoon, that was of course not what made me think it was a poor episode, it was pretty much everything else that happened, or was said (oh by christ some of the dialogue was bad), or was shown onscreen, that made me think that. Yes Mr Ogg is good, but he's actually better as Trevor in GTAV than he is in TWD for my money - he's kind of wasted here. (His turn in Better Call Saul was a fuckton better than this, in fact, Better Call Saul is in a whole other universe from TWD. The latest episode was both stupid and boring, you know something's really quite bad when you can't help but start dicking about with your phone and hoping for the programme to finish.)

Me continuing to watch TWD is like that bad relationship you just don't get out of for a long time after you really should have done, because somewhere inside you're clinging onto a sort of desperate hope that one day it'll go back to how it was before, but deep down you know it'll never happen and all that's left is empty fucking and the sadness of silence afterwards when you realise neither of you have a thing of any note or tenderness to say to one another. And then you wash your cock in the sink before trudging three miles in the pouring rain to get the Metrolink home, as your soul screams for something better.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/20 ... 90af92e683 - 'Worst episode ever'

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 26976.html - 'The most filler episode in the show's history'

http://www.digitalspy.com/tv/the-walkin ... ting-lull/ - 'Never say the writers of The Walking Dead don't have a sense of humour. Because they must be playing with us, naming an episode as lifeless as this, 'Go Getters'.'

http://www.gamesradar.com/the-walking-d ... lkers-now/ - 'I’m officially rooting for the Walkers now. Well, and the tiger. '

Author:  KovacsC [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:14 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

You make me chuckle

Author:  Zardoz [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Try not fucking The Walking Dead.

Author:  Grim... [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:23 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

MrChris wrote:
I don't mean series 7 ep 5

It probably isn't fixed, what with me having no idea what you're talking about. I doubt you should try it again.

Author:  MrChris [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:46 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Grim... wrote:
MrChris wrote:
I don't mean series 7 ep 5

It probably isn't fixed, what with me having no idea what you're talking about. I doubt you should try it again.

Okay, thank you for doing nothing about it. It hasn't worked. And apologies for not talking about it on here.

Author:  Satsuma [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I'm sort of leaning towards AE's viewpoint at the moment. I came for the gritty apocalypse survival tale but after some good seasons it's going down the daft comic book route. Obviously these are the roots of the programme but now there's tigers, comedy villains and the like I'm starting to get a bit annoyed.

Author:  Zardoz [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:37 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

There's only one tiger.

Author:  Zardoz [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 13:32 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Any pre-episode thoughts, Hearthly?

Author:  Hearthly [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 13:58 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Zardoz wrote:
Any pre-episode thoughts, Hearthly?


It's going to be rubbish and disappointing, I just haven't made my mind up exactly how yet.

I'll be watching it after the family have gone up to bed, so expect grumpy reportage this side of midnight.

Or who knows, maybe it'll be this season's 'Morgan' episode, (you know, the one in Season 6 where it was just Morgan and that dude at his house), and I'll be super-impressed!

EDIT - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here%27s_Not_Here <<< This episode, which proves they can get it absolutely spot-on if they can be bothered. Seriously, this was such a fucking good episode, make them all as good as this one, idiots!

I should be an Executive Producer at AMC.

Author:  Satsuma [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 21:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

AE is going to be so cross tonight. I can't wait!

I bet he moans about the following:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The utterly fucking ridiculous black woman at the end.

The pathetic attempt at the zombies to eat someone in front of them.


Or, my favourite

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Woman who runs out of ammo looking at the gun like she's never run out of ammo before.

Author:  Hearthly [ Mon Nov 28, 2016 23:31 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Like so many episodes there's a little bit of promise in there, what happened to Heath and Tara could be an interesting story, but instead they manage to make both zombies and a community of lesbians boring. How is that even possible?

If it weren't for the fact I properly fancy Tara, that episode would have been borderline unwatchable.

It's not even worth getting started on the stupid shit or stuff that made no sense.

They should put the zombies in charge of making it, to improve overall quality.

Author:  Hearthly [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Right I was a bit under the influence last night as it was my first evening off the 24 hour on-call rota for over a week so of course one celebrates this with the finest Pinot Grigio that Tesco have to offer in box form for under twenty quid.

COHERENT THOUGHTS:

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
So the community of women have run away from the Saviours (albeit not very far, surely in a place that is really quite big such as America, they'd have got more than a few miles away, eh?), and have a stupid shoot-to-kill policy that makes no sense, then about fifty of them armed with high-powered weaponry manage to completely miss Tara with several million rounds, making enough noise to attract anyone and anything within a 50 mile radius. VERY SMART.

I assume that Tara had deduced that the two guides weren't actually going to let her go and were instead planning to kill her, hence her escape attempt, but this was not very well indicated and had to be worked out retrospectively. In a show where so much time is given over to fluff and filler, this really could have been better explained.

The return to the zombie bridge with Cindy was stupid. Of all the ways to approach the situation that was probably the dumbest, Ian has already pointed out the look of astonishment on Cindy's face when her clip of ammo runs out, despite the fact she's the one who's best with guns apparently. Not only did she not think to reload, they'd also apparently done no assessment of how many shots were in the clip, how much cover she could thus provide, and so on.

The 'Heath-esque' zombie. Really? We're going with that absolutely insane coincidence, are we? THAT'S THE BEST THING YOU COULD THINK OF?

Also, another new community and group of people. Because we need that.

ALL THAT SAID it wasn't a dreadful episode on reflection, Tara is a pretty good character, the narrative structure was alright, and there was some emotional heft as Tara learns all the bad shit that's gone down in her absence.

Then again, the extent to which the show is content to completely ignore the main storyline in favour of characters we haven't seen for eons (I couldn't even remember Heath's name until Tara called him Heath), means the whole thing is plodding along aimlessly at something of a glacial pace with no particular sense of direction. JUST LIKE A ZOMBIE HA HA LOLS.

Author:  MaliA [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 22:46 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Yeah, didn't like that one.
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
Had forgotten who Tara was or why she was there and then she waan't killed at least five times when opportunity arose. It needed brooding danger, not a rubbish paranoid camp

Author:  Mr Dave [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 23:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Nor did I
ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
The lack of transforming spoon really spoiled the mandela-inspired continuity

No, not Nelson.

Author:  Hearthly [ Tue Nov 29, 2016 23:13 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

On the plus side Tara is well fit and I totes have the hots for her.

If it were some random secondary bloke character featuring prominently in that episode, I'd have been more aggrieved.

But yeah, TWD is basically crap now, they should do the decent thing and cull it this season with a proper send-off, but they won't do that because MONEY.

ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view!
I know there's that whole 'OH WE HAVE TO BE TRUE TO THE COMICS!' thing going on, but fuck that, killing off Glenn and Abraham was fucking idiotic, two of the better characters annihilated from the roster after they'd needlessly fed other good characters to the zombies or whatever other random shit has been bumping them off. Assfaces.


IT'S NO BOJACK HORSEMAN. Or Stranger Things. Or Fargo. Or Black Mirror. And fuck knows what else that does compelling storytelling about three billion times better than TWD has managed for quite some time.

Author:  MaliA [ Wed Nov 30, 2016 16:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

New gig, Hearthly?

Author:  Hearthly [ Wed Nov 30, 2016 17:19 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

MaliA wrote:


Quote:
Last week’s instalment, the soporific nadir if you like, was set at the Hilltop colony. Carl and Enid roller-skated, Maggie and Sasha hid in a cupboard – but not the cupboard you thought! – and there was actually an extended scene in which three characters prayed near some bread.

Author:  MrChris [ Wed Nov 30, 2016 22:30 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I gave up after about five minutes on this one... I have to confess I was slightly prejudiced by you guys.

Author:  Curiosity [ Thu Dec 01, 2016 8:57 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

I thought it was a really good episode.

Also, the young girl clearly checked her ammo, realised she was running low, and had a look of resignation on her face, not amazement.

The fake Heath was stupid, but other than that I thought it was strong, and the community's location and policy made sense.

Author:  MrChris [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 22:25 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

Ffs. The one member of the group who is a lesbian ends up in a lesbian commune? Wtf are the chances....

Author:  Satsuma [ Sun Dec 04, 2016 22:54 ]
Post subject:  Re: The Walking Dead

It's never said it's a lesbian commune. If anything, they express some interest in finding her male companion to see if he'll join them. I bet Heath will be kicking himself when she tells him what she actually did.

Page 29 of 34 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/