Be Excellent To Each Other https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/ |
|
The Movie topic https://www.beexcellenttoeachother.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3817 |
Page 24 of 424 |
Author: | Cras [ Tue Oct 13, 2009 17:25 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Yeah. South Park kinda ruins any attractiveness Paris Hilton may ever have had. |
Author: | DBSnappa [ Tue Oct 13, 2009 17:34 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Craster wrote: Yeah. South Park kinda ruins any attractiveness Paris Hilton may ever have had. She's always looked a little like someone with Down's to me. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Tue Oct 13, 2009 22:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
[•REC] is a bit good, isn't it? |
Author: | sinister agent [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 0:19 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DBSnappa wrote: Grim... wrote: I fancy Paris Hilton. Lots. There's nothing wrong with fancying her as it hardly takes a leap of the imagination to believe she would be a filthy filthy slut in bed. Liking her is a different matter though - one I suspect would possibly encourage depraved behaviour on your part Meh. Real filth takes imagination and a spark she shows no sign of having. I'd imagine she fucks like a porn star - mechanically, impersonally, and entirely for show. |
Author: | Dimrill [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 0:53 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: [•REC] is a bit good, isn't it? Yep. Most tense zombie film in agges, |
Author: | Mr Russell [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:24 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
See, I only saw Quarantine but I hear it was pretty much a shot for shot remake. |
Author: | Dimrill [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:28 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
You saw it in quarantine? Rabies again? |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:15 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Dimrill wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: [•REC] is a bit good, isn't it? Yep. Most tense zombie film in agges, |
Author: | DBSnappa [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
sinister agent wrote: DBSnappa wrote: Grim... wrote: I fancy Paris Hilton. Lots. There's nothing wrong with fancying her as it hardly takes a leap of the imagination to believe she would be a filthy filthy slut in bed. Liking her is a different matter though - one I suspect would possibly encourage depraved behaviour on your part Meh. Real filth takes imagination and a spark she shows no sign of having. I'd imagine she fucks like a porn star - mechanically, impersonally, and entirely for show. You make a good point. Right, that's enough about the vapid fuckwit. |
Author: | myp [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DBSnappa wrote: You make a good point. Right, that's enough about the vapid fuckwit. Someone showed me her sex tape on a night shift once. She was like a lifeless corpse. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
myp wrote: DBSnappa wrote: You make a good point. Right, that's enough about the vapid fuckwit. Someone showed me her sex tape on a night shift once. She was like a lifeless corpse. You ever seen the Keeley one? She barely moves. |
Author: | Morte [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:06 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Mr Russell wrote: See, I only saw Quarantine but I hear it was pretty much a shot for shot remake. Not quite a shot for shot remake, there is more stuff in the Fire Station in Quarantine (which doesn't really add to the film) and there is more exposition / detailing the background in the remake. Having said that Quarantine is probably the best remake of a foreign film that the yanks have done |
Author: | devilman [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:10 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DBSnappa wrote: Grim... wrote: I fancy Paris Hilton. Lots. There's nothing wrong with fancying her as it hardly takes a leap of the imagination to believe she would be a filthy filthy slut in bed. Liking her is a different matter though - one I suspect would possibly encourage depraved behaviour on your part I liked watching her die in House of Wax. |
Author: | RuySan [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:10 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Morte wrote: Mr Russell wrote: See, I only saw Quarantine but I hear it was pretty much a shot for shot remake. Not quite a shot for shot remake, there is more stuff in the Fire Station in Quarantine (which doesn't really add to the film) and there is more exposition / detailing the background in the remake. Having said that Quarantine is probably the best remake of a foreign film that the yanks have done Which for me kinda negates its point. If you're going to make it shot for shot why just not see the original? [REC] is imo the best zombie film ever. |
Author: | The Rev Owen [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:11 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
RuySan wrote: [REC] is imo the best zombie film ever. I don't know if I'd go that far, but it's pretty bloody great. |
Author: | RuySan [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:12 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
The Rev Owen wrote: RuySan wrote: [REC] is imo the best zombie film ever. I don't know if I'd go that far, but it's pretty bloody great. It's the scariest, and i'm glad someone brought back the horror in this age of zombie parodies. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
RuySan wrote: Which for me kinda negates its point. If you're going to make it shot for shot why just not see the original? Because Americans don't like subtitles. And I think I'd prefer a shot-for-shot remake over a dub.Also, it's not quite shot for shot. I looked on Wikipedia. Apart from anything else, they've changed the explanation: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! Added exposition: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | RuySan [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:41 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Doctor Glyndwr wrote: RuySan wrote: Which for me kinda negates its point. If you're going to make it shot for shot why just not see the original? Because Americans don't like subtitles. And I think I'd prefer a shot-for-shot remake over a dub.Also, it's not quite shot for shot. I looked on Wikipedia. Apart from anything else, they've changed the explanation: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! What a load of bollocks. That sounds like a Resident Evil plot. The original was so much better. And the spanish actress is way hotter than Dexter's sister. |
Author: | The Rev Owen [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:43 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
http://actionflickchick.com/superaction/every-zombie/ A list of every zombie ever made, apparently. Includes 28 Days/Weeks Later. |
Author: | Doctor Glyndwr [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:55 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
RuySan wrote: What a load of bollocks. That sounds like a Resident Evil plot. The original was so much better. And the spanish actress is way hotter than Dexter's sister. I agree with all of these assertions.
|
Author: | DBSnappa [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:57 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
RuySan wrote: Doctor Glyndwr wrote: RuySan wrote: Which for me kinda negates its point. If you're going to make it shot for shot why just not see the original? Because Americans don't like subtitles. And I think I'd prefer a shot-for-shot remake over a dub.Also, it's not quite shot for shot. I looked on Wikipedia. Apart from anything else, they've changed the explanation: ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! What a load of bollocks. That sounds like a Resident Evil plot. The original was so much better. And the spanish actress is way hotter than Dexter's real life wife. FTFY |
Author: | DBSnappa [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:00 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Remind me to hack into HC's Lovefilm account. The next one on her list arrived this morning. After The Fountain, which was fucking dreadful I see Australia has arrived Makes me wonder what kind of other shit she has in the pipeline, but there must be a finite amount of shit films with Jack Hughman in, surely. Nicole Kidman can fuck off as well. |
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:07 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
uhhh. uhhhhh.... Watch this: Also (cast spoiler) ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! |
Author: | RuySan [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:08 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
What was wrong with the Fountain? Besides being pretentious and me not understanding half of it? It was nice to look at:) And Jackman is in The Prestige which is awesome. |
Author: | Rodafowa [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
DBSnappa wrote: I see Australia has arrived What, all of it? |
Author: | BikNorton [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:40 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
LewieP wrote: Apparently there is a scene with Stallone Did... you know what Stallone looks like, right? From that trailer it looks like they're all scenes with Stallone.
|
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:49 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
BikNorton wrote: LewieP wrote: Apparently there is a scene with Stallone Did... you know what Stallone looks like, right? From that trailer it looks like they're all scenes with Stallone.ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! That said, I do know what Stallone looks like, but he doesn't look like Stallone anymore. Something has happened to his face. |
Author: | grumpysmurf [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:58 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Finally got around to seeing Dog Soldiers. The fireside 'devil tattoo' scene was awesome. The effects are a bit ropey and it kind of falls apart near the end, but all up it's a great little film. Also, Lucius Vorenus is in it - he's always good value. |
Author: | Mr Russell [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 13:03 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
LewieP wrote: BikNorton wrote: LewieP wrote: Apparently there is a scene with Stallone Did... you know what Stallone looks like, right? From that trailer it looks like they're all scenes with Stallone.ZOMG Spoiler! Click here to view! That said, I do know what Stallone looks like, but he doesn't look like Stallone anymore. Something has happened to his face. He had a stroke when he was young you insensitive prick! |
Author: | LewieP [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 13:14 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Did he really? Looks more like he has had cosmetic surgery. |
Author: | Dimrill [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 14:04 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
LewieP wrote: uhhh. uhhhhh.... *80s action film gasm* |
Author: | Grim... [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 14:22 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
The Expendables looks fucking great! Is that Stone Cold Steve Austin? |
Author: | Dimrill [ Wed Oct 14, 2009 14:23 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Yep. And Randy Couture's in there too. |
Author: | Runcle [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 18:30 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Someone recommend me a film. |
Author: | Dimrill [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 18:32 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Kodak 120. |
Author: | LewieP [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 18:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Runcle wrote: Someone recommend me a film. I just watched Romeo is Bleeding the other day. Not bad at all. Stars commissioner Gordon playing a corrupt cop. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 19:31 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Runcle wrote: Someone recommend me a film. I'm in a 70s mood, so Dirty Harry or Taxi Driver. Ooh, or French Connection. |
Author: | Cras [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 20:36 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Has anyone seen Zombieland yet? |
Author: | DavPaz [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 20:43 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
i'm currently watching gi joe. Mainly the redhead |
Author: | MrChris [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 20:44 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Please god, do not be meaning Scarecrow Miller. |
Author: | DavPaz [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 20:46 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Mr Chris wrote: Please god, do not be meaning Scarecrow Miller. Certainly not. The lady in question is delightfuly built. |
Author: | Cras [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 20:48 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Mr Chris wrote: Please god, do not be meaning Scarecrow Miller. Sienna Miller is a delightfully put together woman. |
Author: | MrChris [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 21:02 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
So's Anne Widdecombe, from a certain point of view. |
Author: | Cras [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 21:03 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Your house is falling down. |
Author: | MrChris [ Thu Oct 15, 2009 21:08 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
So's your face. |
Author: | Grim... [ Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:01 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Nikita Loves Jenna is crap. |
Author: | Agent Starling [ Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:20 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
I bought Coraline earlier (a rather lovely bargain at Asda at under eight notes). Watching it tomorrow night and expect great things indeed. |
Author: | Dimrill [ Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:47 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Grim... wrote: Nikita Loves Jenna is crap. Is that a spang film starring Ms Jameson? |
Author: | Curiosity [ Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:39 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Agent Starling wrote: I bought Coraline earlier (a rather lovely bargain at Asda at under eight notes). Watching it tomorrow night and expect great things indeed. [pedant]Under 40 pounds? One would hope so![/pedant] |
Author: | zaphod79 [ Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:20 ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Movie topic |
Dimrill wrote: Grim... wrote: Nikita Loves Jenna is crap. Is that a spang film starring Ms Jameson? IMDB says "yes" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1523517/ As does Ms Jameson's own website (which i'm not linking to) , would that review not be better in the viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4631 The Grot, Grumble and Scud thread ? |
Page 24 of 424 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |