Rewatched 'Event Horizon' last night, and it's still a tight, effective, pretty gruesome haunted house in space flick. (The CGI holds up reasonably well too.)

The CGI scene at the beginning with the rotating space station took up a third of the film's budget. TRUFAX!

Event Horizon is bad.

In Event Horizon the premise is that the ship has travelled to hell and back, and then torments the rescue crew with visions of hell through the prism of their own fears and guilt until they go kill-crazy and start wanting to gouge their own eyes out.

Ironically, Event Horizon is pretty much the only film directed by Paul W.S. Anderson that hasn't made me want to gouge my eyes out. The man's fucking terrible.

He directed Soldier. I love that.

Same universe as... Alien, I think

So who else is looking forward to the James Brown biopic?

What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

It is stupidly large and bright, but turning off signatures entirely is a wise move in general.

It is stupidly large and bright, but turning off signatures entirely is a wise move in general.

Keep signatures, images and avatars to a sensible size

What the fuck is that signature all about? It's hideous.

I think we need a massive argument about it, at least one flounce, then a poll, then everyone can just carry on and ignore it.

Myp in particular as he has everyone on super ignore anyway.

I would never stoop so low as to flounce. That involves making sure all and sundry know you're leaving. Whenever I leave, I just slip out of the back entrance with the minimum of fuss.

Like a slippery turd.

You two need to have a fight or something.

Who, me and DavPaz?

My team can't even score past Bournemouth. Ha!

I didn't realise both of you were professional footballers?

I didn't realise both of you were professional footballers?

So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Consider this my fewer

So when you say "my' you actually mean "the team that I support".

Yes, it's a shortening of that form. Because saying 'the team that I support' all the time would be fucking tedious. Like this conversation.

People who say 'less' incorrectly when it's meant to be fewer are just plain wrong.

The thing that really boils my piss is using "we" when talking about a football match that they weren't even at, let alone played in the team.

The thing that really boils my piss is using "we" when talking about a football match that they weren't even at, let alone played in the team.

Over the last few years I have found going to football matches a bit of a chore though, mainly because of the clientele they seem to attract (or at least a vocal minority).

As someone who's always hated football that was one of the major reasons why. The idea that it's actually got worse recently boggles my mind.

I hate the way Americans refer to sports teams as individuals. An example? Why, of course! In the Olympic Ice Hockey, the US guys would say things like "Finland needs to play better to overturn that deficit" instead of "Finland need to play better...". It just bugs me, m'kay

Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

Referring to collectives as singulars for that purpose is not American, and also not incorrect.

In British usage, however, plural verbs are sometimes employed in this context, esp when reference is being made to a collection of individual objects or people rather than to the group as a unit: the family are all on holiday.

It's horrible.

Also Collins thinks you're wrong:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ ... e+noun?s=t